Illustration for District 6 Supervisorial Race 2026 with city landmarks and a portrait labeled “Matt Dorsey” below.

District 6 includes SoMa, Mission Bay, Treasure Island and Yerba Buena.

Its current supervisor Matt Dorsey was appointed by Mayor London Breed on May 9, 2022, to replace outgoing District 6 supervisor Matt Haney, who was elected to the state assembly.

Dorsey is up for re-election this November against one challenger, Alex Behrend. We have decided not to cover Behrend given our guidelines here. 


District 6 supervisor Matt Dorsey has called for expanding San Francisco’s use of police drones and automated license plate readers, arguing that both are helping solve crimes. The city has embraced both technologies in recent years. SFPD now has more than 400 Flock license-plate readers, while its drone program has expanded since voters approved Proposition E in 2024.

San Francisco has rules governing police surveillance. A 2019 ordinance requires city departments to publicly disclose the surveillance technologies they use and policies governing how they are used. But 2024’s Proposition E loosened some of those requirements for police, creating exemptions that allow police to use drones and public-safety cameras with fewer restrictions in certain cases, like police chases, and to deploy new surveillance technology for up to a year before submitting a use policy to the Board of Supervisors.

Recent controversies have called the current status quo into question. Between 2024 and 2025, outside agencies improperly searched San Francisco’s Flock data 1.6 million times, including at least 19 searches on behalf of ICE, according to the San Francisco Standard. This June, SFPD disclosed another 299 improper searches by federal and out-of-state agencies. Police cut off the access that enabled those searches, and the Department of Police Accountability and Human Rights Commission are investigating the breach.

Police drones also operate under restrictions, including rules intended to minimize the recording of people uninvolved in crimes. But its use in prosecutions has raised questions about how drone footage is interpreted. Prosecutors dismissed a drug case based on drone surveillance after a defense attorney successfully argued that footage police believed showed a drug transaction instead showed a handshake.

The city controller has identified broader gaps in surveillance oversight. A 2025 audit from the city controller’s office found that no single entity was responsible for monitoring compliance with the city’s surveillance law and warned that inconsistent exemptions could leave room for privacy abuses. 

This week’s question: Should San Francisco place limits on police use of drones and automated license plate readers? If so, what should those limits be?


Mission Local color codes the answers to yes/no questions. A blue background means the candidate answered yes, an orange background means no and a yellow background means that the candidate dodged the question. 

Answered yes
Answered no
Ambiguous

Illustration of a smiling man in a suit and tie with short gray hair, set against a green background with check marks.

Matt Dorsey

  • Job: Current District 6 Supervisor
  • Age: 61
  • Residency: Renter, living in District 6 since 2008, has lived in San Francisco since 1990 (except for four years in Washington, D.C.).
  • Transportation: Public transit, walking, biking
  • Education: Bachelor’s degree from Emerson College
  • Languages: English
  • Website: Reelect Matt Dorsey 2026

San Francisco already has some of the nation’s most stringent privacy safeguards in place now: our voter-amended Surveillance Technology Ordinance; our independent Department of Police Accountability; our Police Commission; and 21st century police reforms SFPD has adopted to ensure constitutional policing.

However, I also believe safety technologies are too important to a fair and functional justice system to tolerate abuses that could diminish public support or undermine its effectiveness. So, I’m open to new guardrails that deter and punish misuses — but would oppose limitations premised on speculative harms to prohibit technologies that are measurably enhancing public safety and solving crimes.

Endorsed by: Mayor Daniel Lurie, District Attorney Brooke Jenkins, Sheriff Paul Miyamoto, Senator Scott Wiener read more here.


Answers may be lightly edited for formatting, spelling and grammar. If you have questions for the candidates, please let us know at sarah@missionlocal.com // io@missionlocal.com

You can register to vote via the sf.gov website.

Sarah Hopkins reports on SoMa, Mission Bay and other matters for Mission Local.

With a background in science writing, she has reported on environmental justice, climate change, technology and intersections between science, politics and law. She earned a master's degree from MIT's science journalism program in 2024.

Her reporting has appeared in the Guardian, Inside Climate News and Undark Magazine, among other publications. She is fluent in Spanish.

You can reach her securely on Signal @sarah.270.

Leave a comment

Please keep your comments short and civil. Do not leave multiple comments under multiple names on one article. We will zap comments that fail to adhere to these short and easy-to-follow rules.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *