In the week since a ban on vending went into effect, the 16th and 24th Street BART plazas remain free of vendors — as long as the tag teams consisting of two police officers and two Public Works staff are present. The teams move along any vendors that have gathered in the morning and for the first time in months, the plazas have been clear for most of the day. 

What’s less clear is what happened to the 100 or so vendors who formed an association to oppose or delay the vending ban. A few are on side streets not covered by the ban. Even fewer are in the two sanctioned sites the city has rented. 

Those at 2137 Mission St. — meant to accommodate 43 vendors, but rarely attracting more than eight during this first week — are frustrated by the lack of customers and sales. Papel picado hangs from the ceiling, and a stuffed reindeer greets visitors at the door, but the taped-off empty vending spots make the space feel like a party that has yet to begin. 

“There are no people,” said Maria, who has staffed her stall of toiletries and lingerie since Nov. 27, when the ban began and the site opened. “They’re out there on the street.”

At times, Maria and her fellow vendors go out to the sidewalk to encourage pedestrians, but those efforts have not made much difference. On Sunday, she had sold only $30 worth of merchandise. 

Maneul Solero, another vendor inside, had only sold three items, and those, he said, were purchased by a city supervisor who stopped in. 

“I haven’t heard anything about assistance,” he said, except that there might be some for women with children. “And men don’t have children?” he asked. 

The city is paying $100,000 in rent for vendors to use 2137 Mission St. during the 90-day ban. It is clean and well-kept, but simply lacks activity — and vendors.

  • San francisco mexican market - san francisco mexican market - san fr.
  • A woman sits in front of a table full of products.
  • A woman is selling clothes at a flea market.
  • A group of people standing around a table.
YouTube video

“Until people know we are here, we won’t have customers,” said Franco, who sells speakers and other electronic equipment. He had made $80 the entire week. 

Still, he remained confident. “This will get better in a couple of weeks,” he said as two customers approached his table and asked after prices. They left after hearing the speakers cost $40 each.

The Mayor’s Office of  Economic and Workforce Development, which is overseeing the two sanctioned spots, did not respond to an interview request. 

The second sanctioned spot at Capp and 24th Street has room for nine vendors, but it has yet to hit capacity. 

“I keep telling people, it’s like the beginning of the pandemic, if in the morning it’s one type of news, and by the afternoon that’s changed,” said Susana Rojas, executive director of Calle 24, referring to the rules imposed on the vendors. 

Rojas said vendors must apply for a spot inside one of the two sanctioned spots. 

They can also apply to Public Works to sell in zones that are not banned.  In the months leading up to the ban, Rojas helped vendors apply for permits to sell on the street, but those no longer work on Mission Street during the 90-day ban.

Efforts appear to be underway to get more customers into the sanctioned sites. The Latino Task Force has developed fliers to advertise the spaces and, earlier in the week, a DJ played music at the 24th Street site to attract visitors.

Sales on the street

Most of the sales activity, however, is still on the street.

The vending activity on Mission Street between 16th and 24th streets comes and goes, depending on how recently a third team from public works and the SFPD has patrolled. The teams are on duty at the plazas and along Mission Street from 9 a.m. to 8 p.m. on weekdays and 10 a.m. to 4 p.m. on weekends. But on the first weekend, they remained at the plazas from 8 a.m. to 8 p.m. 

On Thursday afternoon, seven vendors sold small items from paper bags, suitcases, or a backpack. An hour later, they were gone

  • A box sitting on a sidewalk next to a car.
  • One of the vendors, A woman, is leaning against a tree on a sidewalk.
  • A group of vendors sitting on the side of the road.
  • A group of people standing on a sidewalk.
  • A man standing on a sidewalk next to a suitcase.
  • A red and blue tiled sidewalk with vendors
  • A group of people standing on a sidewalk.
  • A man riding a bike past vendors on a bustling city street.

It’s clear by the random and scant articles for sale — pens, pencils, a pair of tennis shoes — that few of the vendors remaining on the street would be likely candidates for a space inside the city-run markets. They seem more intent on making a fast sale than waiting patiently for customers to come inside and browse.

On Sunday, like others inside at 2137 Mission St., Franco wandered toward the front door to see what was happening on the sidewalk.  

He could see at least five vendors nearby, ignoring the ban and selling random items spread in front of them. One woman selling used clothing appeared to be doing a brisk business. 

YouTube video

By Monday afternoon, many more such vendors had found spots on Mission Street. Between 1 and 2 p.m., we counted some 16 vendors scattered between 15th and 24th Streets.

A former vendor sitting, sans goods, between 16th and 17th streets said she failed to get a space at 24th Street. She said that, for now, she is not doing anything. 

A few feet away from her sat Pedro Sanchez, an unhoused and undocumented man with a tiny table of random goods before him — a bottle of mustard, an iPad, comic books, a wallet — items he said in Spanish he purchases from “the thieves.” 

“For me, it’s not a crime to do this,” said Sanchez, adding that he has been working this way for years, making a few hundred dollars each month, and prefers this to stealing or begging. “A crime would be robbery. A crime would be assault with a pistol.” 

If he got asked to move, he would move, Sanchez said, but if he got a citation for illegal vending, he said it wouldn’t matter — he simply wouldn’t pay it. 

Where some vendors have gone

On Sunday, four vendors had set up on 24th Street near Capp Street, and another two on Capp Street. A woman on 24th Street said they had been given permission to be there, and the stalls of Artesania looked orderly; each had a red awning. 

On Monday morning, Justo Garcia, who generally sells vintage items on Mission Street, had set up shop near Ritual Coffee on Valencia Street. He said it was busy during the weekend, but on weekdays, he said, “people are in a rush” and do not stop as often.

Justo Garcia, one of Mission Street's vendors, standing in front of a van.
Justo Garcia Monday Dec. 4, 2:55 on Valencia St. Photo by Lydia Chávez.

The clients, he added, were different as well. On Mission Street, his customers are largely Latinx; on Valencia, mostly, he said in Spanish, “Americans and foreigners.” Their ways of doing business also differ. On Mission Street, it is cash, but on Valencia Street “there is very little cash.” His Valencia Street customers want to use Apple Pay or a credit card, and he’s not yet set up for that. 

Monday on Mission Street, one vendor sold blankets from the back of his van. He said it was all wholesale and that, so far, officers had not bothered him. He wants to find a space of his own, and has no interest in becoming part of the indoor market. 

“It’s just better,” he said, to have a space of his own. He is talking to someone about a small space for $2,000 a month. 

One of Mission Street's vendors is opening the trunk of a car.
One vendor is selling out of the back of his SUV on Mission Street. Dec. 4, 2023 4:12 p.m. Photo by Lydia Chávez.

If you want more reporting like this, please consider supporting Mission Local.

Eleni Balakrishnan contributed reporting to this article.

We have been checking Mission Street since the vending ban was enacted on Nov. 27 and documenting when and where vendors, police officers and Public Works staff show up. The maps below will be updated throughout the week, with stories to follow.

16th St. Mission BART Plaza

24th St. Mission BART Plaza

Follow Us

Founder/Executive Editor. I’ve been a Mission resident since 1998 and a professor emeritus at Berkeley’s J-school since 2019 when I retired. I got my start in newspapers at the Albuquerque Tribune in the city where I was born and raised. Like many local news outlets, The Tribune no longer exists. I left daily newspapers after working at The New York Times for the business, foreign and city desks. Lucky for all of us, it is still there.

As an old friend once pointed out, local has long been in my bones. My Master’s Project at Columbia, later published in New York Magazine, was on New York City’s experiment in community boards.

Right now I'm trying to figure out how you make that long-held interest in local news sustainable. The answer continues to elude me.

Xueer is a California Local News Fellow, working on data and covering housing. Xueer is a bilingual multimedia journalist fluent in Chinese and English and is passionate about data, graphics, and innovative ways of storytelling. Xueer graduated from UC Berkeley Graduate School of Journalism with a Master's Degree in May 2023. She also loves cooking, photography, and scuba diving.

Join the Conversation

18 Comments

  1. So these fellas take up parking all day to compete with brick and mortar businesses for customers. Of course the threewheeler brigade no where to be seen (meter re-upping is illegal), they’d need a police escort. Fast-forward ten years and you get boarded up storefronts and property owners compelled to sue the City for damages and to waive the vacancy tax.

    +6
    -1
    votes. Sign in to vote
    1. I highly doubt the street vendors are causing failure of brick and mortar businesses. It is like Walgreens blaming them shutting stores due to shoplifters, it is not true.

      +2
      -1
      votes. Sign in to vote
      1. It’s a death by a thousand cuts. Running a storefront, you get to contend with: Amazon, Doordash and Yelp extortions, frivolous ADA lawsuits, breakins, inventory shrink, fent/meth/PCB squalor, tent encampments going up in flames, lactation, Healthy SF, overnight tagging, over-leveraged landlords. An oppressive center bike lane if you’re on Valencia, BRT on Van Ness. It goes on and on, now enter this. At one point you’ll see businesses go away, and stay away.

        +1
        -1
        votes. Sign in to vote
    2. $100 tickets for taxpayers when they are in the wrong spot for 15 minutes, mollycoddling for the folks selling stolen goods.

      0
      -1
      votes. Sign in to vote
  2. While it’s nice to see the Mission BART plazas cleared out, I just don’t believe the police are actually interested in enforcement. I often see two or three cops in the 24th Street plaza, while a couple of blocks away vendors are selling drug store and supermarket items. Can’t the Constables on Patrol…you know….patrol the area? BTW, while I feel badly for the vendors losing their livelihood, workers and customers are gonna be pretty unhappy if their 23rd St Walgreens closes.

    +3
    0
    votes. Sign in to vote
    1. I don’t think police are allowed to enforce vendor regulations. Pretty sure they’re just there to protect DPW while they enforce it.

      0
      0
      votes. Sign in to vote
  3. Enough. The city has bent over backward trying to accommodate legal vendors, illegal vendors, the profiteering nonprofits, and the stolen goods cartels. Offer the legitimate vendors jobs, if they can’t survive without street selling, and enforce the ban.

    +3
    -1
    votes. Sign in to vote
  4. “The city is paying $100,000 in rent for vendors to use 2137 Mission St. during the 90-day ban.”
    How many square feet is 2137 Mission St? What is the average monthly cost per square foot for the area?

    +2
    0
    votes. Sign in to vote
  5. Nice to see them enforcing the ban. Hopefully it will keep the criminals away and create a safer and less chaotic environment (with fewer muggings and stabbings)!

    +2
    -1
    votes. Sign in to vote
  6. I’ve written before that, in some Mexican cities (I don’t know if all) many years ago street vendors were forced into building for the purpose. It took a while, but they preferred the shelter from the weather, the sense of community, and the competition that is good for business.

    +1
    0
    votes. Sign in to vote
  7. At least Mission Local is consistent — consistently on the wrong side of every issue.

    Nobody cares about these vendors but the vendors themselves. They are hurting the city. They are bad for the taxpaying brick-and-mortars that they sit in front of, vulturing business from. They scare away visitors from outside the city.

    They block the streets for disabled access. Mission Local is quick to freak out about “hostile architecture” — plants in planters — but it’s a lot harder to maneuver around someone selling shoplifted goods that are spread out all over the street.

    And you wonder why Mission Local is having a hard time making ends meet. Maybe you should try supporting the city instead of people who are bad for the city.

    +5
    -6
    votes. Sign in to vote
    1. I care about these vendors and I’m not one. I actually very much like them being around and think they are a great part of the neighborhood. Calling people selling t-shirts and tamales scary is pretty funny, and in fact they make the street much more welcoming and vibrant. And yes, I am concerned about the accessibility issue, which is created by the masses of metal barricades placed to deter vending in he first place, making wide sidewalks and plazas into narrow corridors for absolutely no reason.

      +2
      -1
      votes. Sign in to vote
  8. Mission street is so desolate now, I have never seen it feel so empty. Between the cops, vending enforcement, and muni fare enforcement, half of the people out on the street are just there to harass the other half of regular people. Bring back the vendors its the way mission street should be!

    0
    -1
    votes. Sign in to vote
  9. Campers,

    If there were a proper Police Koban on both corners, manned properly with one cop in the box while the other two walk alternate blocks back and forth exchanging then the Vendors could come back and the cops would not have to back up on their paychecks.

    We won’t see that until we get an independent elected Police Chief who has Kobans and Foot Patrols as campaign planks and follows thru or we’ll vote her out.

    English not necessary.

    Marcos, I think a UBI of a grand a month (as they had and it worked in Stockton under a black mayor)

    It costs lots less than our present system per citizen and crime plunges.

    0
    -1
    votes. Sign in to vote
  10. After a certain point, isn’t it more efficient to just give these vendors a few hundred dollars per week in income to not encroach on the public right of way selling often fenced goods than to pay city employees to play whack-a-mole and for nonprofits to launder money through “support services,” and to rent storefront spaces?

    The humanitarian project of government funded charities exists to contain poor people as a colonizing operation and is prohibited from solving problems in favor of monetizing problems over time.

    How many tax dollars are we wasting at every level of government in poverty maintenance that could be used to end or diminish poverty in the first instance, and to what extent is a left politics that could change that structurally foreclosed by compensated advocates?

    The nonprofity premise that the lived experience of the most vulnerable should be centered first and foremost fails when confronted with other legitimate yet less vulnerable conflicting interests.

    “Either you do what we say politically or you hate us and everyone we get paid to purport to represent” and “do what we say or the most vulnerable are gonna get it” has realized increasingly diminished returns.

    Politics as a hair shirt guilt trip is political death and explains the progressive collapse.

    If the nonprofit racketeers continue to get funded and spin off new permutations and combinations into throw-away coalitions of after they’ve lost serial political contests, then we will know that they were ringers paid to throw the match.

    +2
    -8
    votes. Sign in to vote
Leave a comment
Please keep your comments short and civil. Do not leave multiple comments under multiple names on one article. We will zap comments that fail to adhere to these short and very easy-to-follow rules.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *