A woman in an RV stands in her vehicle with her young child in Bayview-Hunters Point. Photo by Mariana Garcia.

San Francisco saw a dramatic rise in the number of children who were homeless, up 27% from two years ago, according to an analysis released this week by the Department of Homelessness and Supportive Housing. 

The number of homeless children increased from 618 to 786, according to the biennial point-in-time count. Of those, 190 were unsheltered, which the department defines as sleeping in tents, outdoors, in vehicles or in abandoned properties. 

That may be an undercount, however. The department noted in its report that because the count was conducted from 6 to 10:30 a.m., “families traveling to school, young people sleeping in less-visible locations, and people reporting to work” presented “challenges” to accurate data.

The federally required point-in-time count is conducted in a single morning in January. The city’s analysis also showed that the number of people experiencing chronic homelessness increased 17% compared to 2024, while the number of people who became homeless for the first time increased by 15%. 

The count also showed that more people than ever are moving to San Francisco while already homeless. About 44% of people counted in January were homeless before coming to the city, the count showed, and nearly a third said accessing city services was a draw. 

“People come to San Francisco quite often because of the services that are available,” said Steve Good, the former CEO of the Bayshore Navigation Center, a homeless shelter. He said living outside San Francisco can be a challenge for homeless adults and families. 

Overall, however, homelessness decreased 4% from 8,323 in 2024 to 7,973 in 2026, and the number of unsheltered homeless people counted decreased even more by 22%. The count is not comprehensive, and serves as a snapshot. 

The comparisons should be taken with caution: The city’s homelessness department changed when it conducts its count this year to the early morning. In prior years, the count was done at night.

That means individuals at school and work might be missed, for example. Christin Evans, who previously sat on the city’s homelessness commission, said using the count to measure changes was like comparing “apples and oranges.” She said the count, especially of families with children, could be higher. 

Overall, the increase in the number of homeless children tracks with a preliminary report of the count released in May showing a 15% increase in the number of homeless families. 

The department connects the increasing number of homeless children to this figure, but also the growing size of homeless households. The number of people in households with children grew 34% from 1,103 in 2024 to 1,474 in 2026. 

The report is “horrifying, but in no way surprising,” said Tuesday Rose Thornton, an eviction defense attorney. 

“I’m watching it happen every day in court,” she said, pointing to landlords who she says use illegal tactics to push families out of apartments to raise the rent. Evictions in San Francisco are on the rise as rental costs have shot up.

San Francisco’s biennial “Point-In-Time Count” is meant to provide a one-time snapshot of the number of unsheltered adults and families on San Francisco’s streets and in its shelters. 

Those who work with homeless people say the count is generally an undercount, and does not include the number of people who filter in and out of the city, or simply were not present on that January morning, including families at work or school. 

San Francisco’s year-end total of its homeless population in 2025, counting anyone who cycled through the homelessness system at some point, topped out at 23,425, compared to the 7,973 counted on its streets in January. 

The report was scheduled to be released this summer, but was delayed twice by leadership changes at the homelessness department. The report was listed on an Oct. 1 Homelessness Oversight Commission agenda, but was delayed for another month. 

It was instead released two days after the election. 

The new data, released Thursday, comes months after Lurie celebrated the overall drop in homelessness shown in the count. 

The increase in homeless families dates back to at least 2022, according to data from the Department of Homelessness and Supportive Housing. 

The city’s already exorbitant rents have grown by record numbers this year, with ensuing consequences. San Francisco’s Rent Board reported a 44% increase in evictions this year compared to last year.

In September, the mayor declared a “rent emergency,” introducing legislation to increase by 25% the amount tenants receive if they are evicted through the Ellis Act. 

Officials with the city’s homeless department say they have made large strides to shelter more homeless families, including a permit program for families living in RVs and other large vehicles. They have expanded San Francisco’s relocation program, they said, and increased problem solving assistance, which includes case management. 

The number of sheltered individuals overall increased in 2026 compared to years past. 

“The findings underscore the significant regional demand on San Francisco’s homelessness response system,” said Deborah Bouk, a department representative. 

But at the same time, she said, the city is “making meaningful progress.” 

Marina Newman is a staff reporter at Mission Local covering Bayview-Hunters Point. Marina began at Mission Local as an intern in 2025 and previously reported on national and international news for the Pacifica Evening News.

Marina was born and raised in San Jose and graduated from UC Berkeley where she studied American Studies and Digital Journalism. You can reach her securely on Signal @marinanewman.12.

Join the Conversation

8 Comments

  1. Thanks for drawing attention to this: “The report was scheduled to be released this summer but was delayed twice by leadership changes at the homelessness department. The report was listed on an Oct. 1 Homelessness Oversight Commission agenda, but was delayed for another month. It was instead released two days after the election.” Surely it was a coincidence that Lurie’s office delayed releasing this damning report until after the election!

    0
    0
    votes. Sign in to vote
  2. The story did not say out of state homeless. Likely some are but most are from Ca. A drive down through the Central Valley will find many homeless in canal areas and under freeway medians. RVs are also easily visible throughout the state. The mayor of LA was just booted for some of the same issues. People are identified as homeless and moved along. That happens here too. So while it’s convenient to say our problem is are generous system it’s not that simple. For me the problem has always been spending the money on emergency services as required by law but not spending less on the underlying problems that drive this sad situation.

    0
    0
    votes. Sign in to vote
  3. “The count also showed that more people than ever are moving to San Francisco while already homeless. About 44% of people counted in January were homeless before coming to the city, the count showed, and nearly a third said accessing city services was a draw.”

    There you have it in a nutshell.

    A massive San Francisco policy failure staring you in the face.

    0
    0
    votes. Sign in to vote
  4. Anyone accusing SF of being a magnet for homeless services— ask any homeless person: the City is brutal to unhoused folks. At one point this year, homeless folks accounted for 50% of our jail population, mainly for the overcharging of misdemeanor drug possession and camping crimes.

    In 2024, when SF Dems successfully lobbied the Trump-stacked U.S. Supreme Court to overturn Grants Pass vs. Johnson, jurisdictions across the country were given the green light to stop investing in homeless services and instead go full throttle on throwing folks into jail (see Louisiana which made erecting lodging on the public right-of-way a felony). See how folks, after being thrown in and out of jail without any offers of services, may come to the only places that have any semblance of “services” left? SF Dems have no one to blame but themselves, and yet, they will continue to blame those that are the victims of our crushing affordability crisis. Nice!

    0
    0
    votes. Sign in to vote
  5. That’s the issue,
    We have so much in services they move from out of state..
    Because the rest of the nation is like let them go to San Francisco they will take care of the homeless food stamps, CAAP, housing,. Medical. And in turn the city ask for more taxes

    +3
    -5
    votes. Sign in to vote
    1. Josh, if you believe that unhoused people are so well cared for, you’re welcome to show us. Go on out and live on the streets and show us how many services there are.

      0
      0
      votes. Sign in to vote
Leave a comment
Please keep your comments short and civil. Do not leave multiple comments under multiple names on one article. We will zap comments that fail to adhere to these short and easy-to-follow rules.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *