A man in a suit and glasses stands at a podium next to a woman who is speaking.
Senator Scott Wiener at the Mission Local and New York Times moderated congressional debate on October 13, 2026 at Sydney Goldstein Theater. Photo by Zoe Malen.

On opposite sides of the Richmond District, canvassers hit the streets on a recent Saturday morning with warring goals.

About 50 union carpenters left Scott Wiener’s Westside headquarters in the Inner Richmond looking to secure votes for the state senator in the race to succeed Nancy Pelosi in Congress. 

Shortly after, 30 union nurses, electricians and other volunteers for Connie Chan, the Richmond District supervisor, set out from Fulton Playground to do the same for their chosen candidate.

The Richmond District has become a battleground in San Francisco’s congressional race, but the symmetry of that battle is not clear: Wiener has invested significant resources in the neighborhood and opened an office there, though Chan feels secure in her victory over the area.

“We’re confident that our constituents in District 1, in the Richmond, know our work,” Chan said.

Chan has represented District 1, which includes the Richmond, for nearly six years, after all, and in 2024 won reelection after a close match in 2020. In the June 2 primary election, Chan came in first place in precincts across the city’s Westside, and performed especially well in the outer avenues.

But Wiener is edging in. He came in first place in District 1 and in many of the Richmond’s northern and eastern precincts, including the one where his Richmond office — which serves as a headquarters for all Westside operations — now lies.

“What we’ve found is that the Richmond is a very untapped market for Scott Wiener supporters,” said Wiener campaign spokesperson Joe Arellano.

The state senator has support from Richmond residents because of his housing and safe-streets stances, Arellano said, and has made inroads with “disgruntled Connie Chan constituents” who care about public safety and homelessness in the neighborhood.

“When they say all politics is local. I think this is a perfect example,” Arellano said. 

Wiener has poured resources into the area. He opened the satellite Westside office there in July, and then spent $20,000 on two neighborhood billboards advertising an AI chatbot designed to criticize Chan’s record. He quickly took down the site, and the billboards, after criticism. 

A billboard for ConnieChan.ai with the slogan “Let’s do nothing together” has graffiti that reads, “SCOTT WIENER IS A WHITE DEVIL CONNIE CHAN FOR CONGRESS” above a Jiffy Lube.
A billboard paid by Scott Wiener’s campaign on Geary Boulevard and 25th Avenue. Photo by Nicholas David.

The candidate has also visited the Clement Street farmer’s market — where his campaigners stand cheek-by-jowl with Chan’s every week — and other events in the neighborhood. His Richmond District office has served as a site for twice-weekly Cantonese phone banking, further reaching into Chan’s base.

Michael Terris, a 40-year local political consultant, said that if Chan can “completely dominate” the Richmond, it could make a difference in the general election. “But,” he added, there are moderate voters in the area Wiener can win over, “which is why he’s trying to cut into her base.”

Others characterize Wiener’s entrance as more “psychological warfare” than vote-getting.

“There’s an element of Senator Wiener’s campaign wanting to gain some ground here,” said Nadia Rahman, a Richmond resident and political consultant who supports Chan. But he is also attempting to portray Chan as losing support in her own backyard, she said, to gin up bad publicity.

Her most recent example: The Wiener campaign produced videos featuring Richmond residents expressing disappointment with their supervisor. 

“If [Chan] hasn’t been effective in the Richmond District,” said one apparent Richmond constituent in one video, “I can’t see how she’ll be effective in Congress.”

Rahman, who formerly directed Saikat Chakrabarti’s unsuccessful primary campaign, said the videos featured known Chan opponents singled out to portray a neighborhood in sway.

“Our district is very much behind Supervisor Chan,” Rahman said. “Senator Wiener’s campaign doing that implies something else.”

A storefront with a large giraffe mural over a rainbow stripe, signs for Scott Wiener for Congress in the windows, and an A-frame sign that reads “Interested in HOUSING? COME ON IN!”.
Scott Wiener’s Westside Headquarters in the Inner Richmond. Photo by Yujie Zhou.

Are Richmond residents ripe for the plucking?

Seen one way, the congressional contest is the latest manifestation of a longstanding political rift in the Richmond, where urban issues like housing and transportation have long embittered neighbors and pitted them against each other. 

Chan’s quiet support for Prop. G, the measure to transform Sunset Dunes park back into a road during the week, for example, is sure to earn her votes in the Westside — and has already become a proxy battle in the congressional race. 

She and Wiener publicly disagreed over a similar controversy when Golden Gate Park’s main thoroughfare permanently closed to cars in 2022 — Chan wanted cars to return to the road — and Wiener has continued to rehash that issue in debates.

Amid those rifts and others, Wiener says he has won the neighborhood’s support. When his campaign painted a bespectacled giraffe on the side of 4300 California St. in July and opened his Westside office there, the state senator immediately claimed victory: He pointed out he came in first place in the district in the primary election. 

“And we’re gonna do it again in November,” he said in a video announcing the office opening. Wiener came in first in District 1 during the primary by 66 votes. 

But that was a three-way contest where Chakrabarti got 17 percent of the vote.

Chakrabarti’s supporters are expected to largely go to Chan this time around, and a staffer familiar with the Chan campaign’s door-knocking efforts said that her popularity in the neighborhood has never been higher.

Chan’s congressional campaign, that staffer said, has more support in the Richmond than did either of her past two runs for district supervisor.

Still, Richmond resident and YIMBY political organizer Bobak Esfandiari called Wiener’s presence “rhetorically correct, philosophically correct, and also politically smart.” Esfandiari works as executive director of the local Democratic Party and has volunteered with Wiener’s campaign.

Wiener’s effort in the neighborhood, he said, “means [Chan] has to continue to spend time earning the votes of people who purportedly should know her the best and, in theory, should like her.”

Esfandiari said he has seen support for Wiener from younger people trying to start families in the neighborhood, and others who appreciate the state senator’s work on housing and transportation.

For Olivia Reynolds, Wiener’s west side organizer, the state senator’s narrow victory in the district made clear that “this part of the city is ready for new leadership,” she wrote in a statement. Wiener’s team has spoken with thousands of Westside voters, she said, and their “reception has been strong” in the avenues.

But Chan appears unfazed. She said her constituents, particularly working people and small business owners, support her and value her local ties.

She recalled one conversation with a neighbor recently: “Connie, you’re gonna be in D.C., then who’s gonna take care of the Richmond?”

Nicholas was born and raised in San Francisco, and has been tracking the city's changes and idiosyncrasies ever since. He holds a bachelor's degree in English literature, and has written for local outlets since 2024.

Nicholas writes the "Richmond Buzz" neighborhood column, and covers culture and news across town.

Join the Conversation

16 Comments

  1. I live in District 1 and fully support Wiener. Chan has been – at best – MIA for 6 years and – at worst – has been a No vote on important issues like more housing, better transit on Geary, and better open space (she opposed the JFK Promenade which is wildly popular). The fact that Wiener got more votes than Chan in her own district in the primary says it all. Add up Wiener’s and Chakrabarti’s votes compared to hers and she was crushed in her own district.

    +6
    -1
    votes. Sign in to vote
  2. “She recalled one conversation with a neighbor recently: “Connie, you’re gonna be in D.C., then who’s gonna take care of the Richmond?””

    Whomever Lurie appoints to replace her. Which paradoxically might deter some from voting for Chan.

    +4
    -1
    votes. Sign in to vote
  3. I really enjoyed reading this article this morning. There was a lot of great content in the piece. However, it lost a bit of credibility with me. Here are the reasons you lost me:

    1. In paragraph 6, you mentioned Connie being re-elected by a “healthy margin.” Both the SF Standard and the SF Chronicle called it a tight race at the time. The actual margin in 2024 was 1,301 votes (51.7% to 48.2%, or about 3.5%). Despite her being an incumbent, aside from District 11, this was the narrowest margin among all Supervisors running in 2024. “Healthy margin” doesn’t seem accurate. At a minimum, including specific details adds valuable context. Another perspective to consider is that she gained only 1,100 additional votes compared to her 2020 election, despite four years as District 1’s Supervisor.

    2. In that same paragraph, you noted that “Chan came in first place in precincts across the city’s west side, and performed especially well in the outer avenues.” For fair reporting, it seems that this is where you would have inserted that Scott received more votes overall in her Supervisor District (by a slim margin) than Connie did. Or, perhaps state that in the next paragraph but not way down below (after readers have stopped reading…)

    3. Where you do state it down below “He (Scott) said he came in first place there (District 1) in the primary election.” Scott either did or he didn’t and I’m pretty sure he did, so why did you categorize it as his opinion versus just fact checking it and finding out if he did or didn’t?

    4. My final comment is about your introduction of Nadia Rahman. “ ‘There’s an element of Senator Wiener’s campaign wanting to gain some ground here,’ said Nadia Rahman, a Richmond resident and political consultant who supports Chan.” Down below in a separate paragraph you state ” Rahman, who formerly directed Saikat Chakrabarti’s unsuccessful primary campaign..” . Given her strong connection to both campaigns, it seems that that would have been a relevant fact to mention at the same time that you quote her opinion above. If you are going to quote her, it would also have seemed relevant to ask her “Are you currently being paid as a consultant to Saikat’s SF Solidarity PAC?” given that that PAC has endorsed Connie. I certainly would like to know, and you could have asked.

    +3
    -1
    votes. Sign in to vote
  4. Mike. You lumped Scott’s and Saikat’s number of votes together vs. Connie. Saikat has asked those who voted for him (18%) to back Connie instead. Add that to Connie’s 29% would make it 47%, which is higher than the 40% that Scott got. I think the votes are maxed out for both Connie and Scott. Saikat’s voters are the most significant. Let’s see if they will turn out.

    +1
    -1
    votes. Sign in to vote
  5. Whoever wins this seat is only going to be there for one term. A blip in the Pelosi dynasty before another one comes round in two years’ time. Whoever wins it now has to deal with a lame duck sociopath who’s hellbent on destroying anything people care about that isn’t himself. No democratic priorities will be passed because the Senate will not have a veto-proof supermajority.

    Nancy always said she knew how to count. I just wish this contest counted for anything, or that either candidate would actually do something to earn my vote. These campaigns could have been emails, and we could have invested all this money back into our communities.

    “Abortions for all…I mean…no abortions for anyone…I mean…abortions for some, miniature American flags for others.” -Kang

    “My fellow Americans, as a young boy, I dreamed of being a baseball, and tonight I say, we must move forward, not backward, upward, not forward…and always twirling, twirling, TWIRLING toward freedom.” -Kodos

    The Simpsons already did it. Treehouse of Horror VII

    +2
    -4
    votes. Sign in to vote
  6. My political junkie oldster friends,

    We’re gonna have fun taking this one apart after the last vote is counted.

    A big factor has been Scott using Artificial Intelligence with the billboards and racist slurs and all early in the campaign.

    So, their AI got that one wrong while the industry is saying their powers of persuasion are better.

    I’m a big fan of Yuval Harari and he says that language is our OS (operating system) and AI has hacked it and can now be more persuasive than a bevy of lawyers and other Public Pulse types (studies have been and are to be done here).

    So, Scott’s AI seems to be doing some halucinating with Chan’s people.

    If anyone else is counting beating Scott here would give Connie two victories over billionaires withing 6 months which I’d bet is better than any single candidate in the country has done.

    And, she did it right in their Trillion Dollar backyard.

    Like I said, I’m certain the Google and Groc bots will be doing lots of Recursive juggling with these numbers and so will I.

    So far, Forrest Gump is beating Ilya Sutskever.

    lol

    Go Niners !!

    h.

    +1
    -3
    votes. Sign in to vote
      1. Negligible affordable housing has been built as a result of YIMBY BS backed by billionaire techbros. The ‘defund’ issue has been construed deliberately to misinform about the intent, which was accountability for law enforcement, not actually disbanding it.

        Truth > Wiener backer lies

        +1
        -1
        votes. Sign in to vote
      2. Negligible affordable housing has been built as a result of YIMBY BS backed by billionaire techbros. The ‘defund’ issue has been construed deliberately to misinform about the intent, which was accountability for law enforcement, not actually disbanding it.

        Truth > Wiener backer lies

        +1
        -1
        votes. Sign in to vote
        1. Building market-rate housing also helps with affordability though. If I cannot find a new market-rate condo to buy then I might instead buy your home and OMI/Ellis you.

          +2
          -1
          votes. Sign in to vote
        2. They’re not lies, they’re facts. It’s just that Chan’s supporters conduct all these mental gymnastics to convince themselves otherwise.

          +2
          -1
          votes. Sign in to vote
  7. Wiener and his big money corporate techbro backers are disgusting liars.
    Chan tells the truth and says no to big money. For me that’s all it’s about.

    +1
    -5
    votes. Sign in to vote
    1. If your a renter and you’re supporting Chan then you’re nothing more than a “useful idiot” doing the bidding of NIMBY property owners.

      +2
      -1
      votes. Sign in to vote
Leave a comment
Please keep your comments short and civil. Do not leave multiple comments under multiple names on one article. We will zap comments that fail to adhere to these short and easy-to-follow rules.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *