In TréBion Williams’ experience, some men take “no” as the start of a negotiation.
As a San Francisco go-go-dancer and a regular about town, he’s been objectified and he’s been groped. His refusals are often met with indifference, or taken as a challenge.
No matter that the behavior is illegal under California Penal Code section 243.4, where it is classified as “sexual battery.”
Since Emanuel “Manny” Yekutiel, widely considered to be the front-runner for District 8’s next supervisor, dropped out of the race Oct. 1, such behavior has also become a citywide topic.
Yekutiel withdrew days after two men told the San Francisco Standard that Yekutiel grabbed their genitals at a 2023 Pride event. A few months earlier, political organizer Brad Chapin went public with an accusation that Yekutiel had violently grabbed his testicles at a 2020 party.
Yekutiel denied Chapin’s allegation, and said of the second that while he does not recall it, he “may have had too much to drink.”
“If I crossed someone’s boundary, then I’m deeply sorry,” Yekutiel said.
Members of San Francisco’s gay community say that Yekutiel’s alleged behavior, while extreme, is part of a pattern. Some people repeatedly disregard consent or boundaries in communal spaces frequented by gay men.
“There’s this idea that we’re gay men, so we want this kind of attention anyway,” Williams said. Some men treat a grab, he said, as the equivalent of “a wave or a handshake.”
It’s a problem, they said, and the accusations against Yekutiel offer an opportunity to underscore the importance of consent.
In a straight bar, one gay man said, a man who kept touching or aggressively pursuing a woman would be frowned on. Among gay men, “because we’re all men, it’s the assumption that this is what you actually want anyway.”
Part of the confusion comes from an early history of nonverbal communication that developed between gay men.
Throughout the 20th century, being publicly identified as gay could mean the loss of a job, or even someone’s life.
To try to remain covert then, men signaled through looks, nods and body language — achieving consent by making it clear that whatever interactions they would have would be voluntary and approved by both parties.
It was no guarantee. In addition to raiding gay bars, local police would also send out “decoy” officers to engage in nonverbal flirtation, and arrest any takers. But it still carried less risk than asking a stranger directly.
“We, as gay people, weren’t allowed to ask for consent in the past,” Williams said, because talking about sexual activities with other men could have put someone in danger. When it became safe to be openly gay, Williams believes “people went all the way to the other side” of the sexual expression spectrum.
Not taking ‘no’ for an answer
San Francisco Supervisor Rafael Mandelman, who is gay and currently represents District 8, which includes the Castro, inflamed the conversation when he told the Standard, “I think sexual assault occurs differently [in the gay community] and there’s a different threshold.”
Mission Local waited three hours outside Mandelman’s office Wednesday to speak to him about the remark, but he did not speak with us.
The supervisor’s comments were met with fury by members of the queer community. A joint statement by elected LGBTQ officials from across the city called on Mandelman to retract and apologize for a statement they see as normalizing sexual assault.
Edward Wright, one of the statement’s co-signers and member of BART’s board of directors, said he and others pushed back on Mandelman because they did not want the only gay male voice out there to be his.
It is important to push back against the generalization, he said, so it was not “the only representation people are hearing.”
At bars, clubs and large parties where gay men crowd together, men described seeing the same pattern play out over the course of an evening. It is not unusual in these venues to see a stranger put his hands on someone else’s chest or watch someone interpret a “no” as “playing hard to get,” the men said.
An unsolicited compliment, they said, can turn into an unwanted interaction.
Nevertheless, all can be sexual assault. The national anti-sexual violence organization RAINN defines sexual assault as “any sexual contact or behavior that happens without clear, voluntary, and informed consent,” including “unwanted sexual touching or fondling.”
Sexual harassment covers unwanted sexual attention more broadly: comments about someone’s body, unwelcome advances and “repeated unwelcome requests after being declined.”
A 2024 review of 30 studies on consent among gay, bisexual, trans and queer men also concluded that nonverbal negotiation in queer spaces like bathhouses and cruising grounds grew out of criminalization. It also highlighted research arguing that blaming assault on “miscommunication” lets aggressors feign ignorance.
Quis Netters, 36, a Denver resident who visits San Francisco frequently, said that when he visits the Castro, making eye contact with another man is still “kind of an unspoken, unwritten rule” that means “you’re kind of giving them the okay.”
Netters has tried nodding at men to be polite, only to have them walk over and touch him. “I’m just looking around, but they take that as a consent,” he said.
Codes of conduct only get you so far
Venues across San Francisco, gay or straight, tend to police themselves when it comes to appropriate behavior in their spaces.
Before most shows at the drag nightclub Oasis, hosts will turn down the music and walk through a code of conduct. For years, organizers of the Folsom Street Fair have posted signs reminding attendees to “ask first” before photographing or touching someone.
Still, some men read walking into a gay bar as permission. At one Castro dance bar, Williams said, he watched strangers grope men who appear uncomfortable, but don’t confront them about it.
Brandon Doyle, 56, who has lived in San Francisco for 31 years, sees the same assumption at parties with a sexual side, even those with a clear code of conduct.
“I think that there is, to some degree, an expectation that if you are in those spaces and dressed the way you are, that it’s an open invitation for people to grab you and grope on you,” he said. “It doesn’t make it right, and it doesn’t make it okay.”
At a packed dance party during Folsom Street Fair, Doyle said, a partygoer who appeared heavily intoxicated draped their arms over his shoulders and began groping him. Doyle repeatedly moved their hands away. They came back.
He said, “Don’t do that” and then, “Stop! Don’t touch me like that,” until two friends stepped in and pushed the person away.
JC Saldana, 32, said that he always makes a plan with a friend before he goes out in the Castro to pretend to be a couple, in order to dissuade approaches from strangers. Still, Saldana said, he goes into some clubs expecting that he “might have to yell at someone” or push a stranger away.
Once inside a packed bar, he moves carefully: nothing more than a light tap on the shoulder or the upper back to notify someone that people are trying to pass by. Saldana doesn’t want people to mistake him for flirting or to feel like they’ve been touched inappropriately.
Saldana has heard his share of excuses for bad behavior. One is the use of alcohol and drugs. He said people “think that they lack accountability because they’re drunk or they’re inebriated.”
He doesn’t buy it. He has seen plenty of people who are still able to understand consent while under the influence of alcohol or other substances.
He’s also noticed a pattern. Often, he said, the people who don’t ask before touching are “people of privilege.” He believes older, wealthier men “think that they can get away with it.”
‘We need to be loud’
Joshua J. Cook, who opened the Castro dance club Beaux 14 years ago, said he built it around what he didn’t have as a young man.
“I do remember being a young person coming into the gay bars and parties, and feeling that introductions to people of an older generation always came with unwelcome hands or attempted kisses or smooches on the neck or embraces that lasted too long,” he said. “It seemed so normalized by absolutely everybody around me that I just didn’t know what to do.”
He said he earned a reputation as a “bitch” because he wouldn’t let men put their hands down his pants.
Cook believes unwanted touching has drastically decreased, but said Beaux continues to run a zero-tolerance policy with a trained security team. Its host, Hera Wynn, reminds the crowd that consent is mandatory.
He rejects the idea that gay bars run on different rules.
“This idea that once you step into a gay bar it’s different is bullshit,” he said. He called the accounts he has heard “very, very isolated,” and not the queer nightlife experience. No one, he said, should have to plan a night out the way Saldana does. “Somebody should be able to come to any venue alone,” he said, and “not need a group of friends.”
In an op-ed published Tuesday, 48hills publisher and co-owner of the SoMa bar the Stud, Marke Bieschke, pushed back on the idea that groping “is a part of the culture.” He called on people to “know better, and be doing better, by now.”
The gay men Mission Local spoke to said that consent can be communicated in a variety of ways, but that consent must not be in doubt. Uncertainty and refusal must be respected.
Williams, for his part, said things are getting better. He credits younger gay men for being “a lot more vocal about their boundaries” than his generation.
Any change has to come from inside the community, Saldana said.
“I think we’ve gotten way too comfortable with not saying anything,” he said. “And I think that we need to be loud.”

Sex is, and always has been, about power. Pride, even events like Folsom, portray themselves as opportunities for us to claim and exert free will over our bodies that some of our ruling systems and leaders oppose. It is saddening, and genuinely terrifying to me, that any gay man in this city would think that it’s acceptable for someone to be forcibly touched without their consent. Especially in sexual spaces. This is why we have volunteers in sexual spaces like dungeon monitors and ranch hands because even when the party is popping, people have the right to stop a scene and change their mind in the middle of it. It’s scary to know that we still allow men in our community to sexually abuse people and get away with it, patronize their businesses, endorse them for public office…
It’s even sadder that the men in the previous comment sections won’t sign their actual names, but I’d be afraid to confess to the community too if I thought it was ok to assault people. Make yourselves known so we can keep an arm’s length away!
For gay males, sex is the great equalizer. That’s what makes gay sex so much easier to negotiate.
Not all of us are working through our shit with stylized BDSM.
Gay males have, by and large, mastered the art of objectifying one another in a healthy manner.
If someone says no, you stop. Why is this so hard for people to understand?
Great article, thank you. It’s encouraging to read that younger people are maintaining clearer boundaries.
There is a lack of clarity in the following text: “An unsolicited compliment, they said, can turn into an unwanted interaction. [paragraph break] Nevertheless, all can be sexual assault.” Do you mean to imply that a compliment can be sexual assault? Maybe “all” needs to be modified.
Let’s just say that times have changed and the queer community needs to change with them.
Yeah … NO ! Men who claim “sexual assault” over pretty normal gay male behavior, are an insult to women who have to deal with actual sexual assaults on a scale gay men have no idea happens.
So explain to me why a man doing it to another man is “normal gay male behavior” but a man doing it to a woman is assault? Susan, you really need to look in the mirror and ask yourself why you need to try to make a story about the gay community about yourself. You’re not a gay man, so this conversation doesn’t really concern you, sweetheart.
Even women can vote now you sexist pig… my preferred candidate has been unfairly targeted with unproven claims and accusations.
And that’s the problem with you. You’re willing to excuse men when they hurt men, but you think only women can be hurt. I’m a sexist pig when you’re literally discounting men’s accounts of sexual battery? It shows what you think of your own sex. Please do us all a favor and don’t vote in this upcoming cycle since you’ve already decided that you like predators.
Mary, Mary,Mary. That you think the little male weaklings actually were “hurt”, shows your ignorance. No real man would consider what was claimed, to even be predatory. I already sent in my ballot.
Sugar, sugar, sugar, calm down. You’re upset because your candidate was one of the bad men you claim to be so worried about.
You’re worried about your own pretend victimhood and you want to vote for someone who has done equivalent harm in a community that you’re not a part of. Keep trying babe. Just because you CAN vote, doesn’t mean you SHOULD vote. Blue MAGA is ugly and thriving in this city.
In the words of Scott Seiss, “You’re not infallible, Susan.”
I can remember back in the very early 1970’s being introduced to someone who at the time was a mover and shaker in Seattle’s nascent “gay liberation” movement. I was impressed that this important and well know person was willing to shake my hand until I realized that it wasn’t my hand he was reaching out and grabbing.
I ended up working on many gay rights projects together with him during my remaining years in Seattle, but I never spoke a word to him after that night, and I obviously still remember his asshole move all these years later. Unwanted touching is assault. Just ask KGO TV reporter Dan Noyes: https://youtu.be/pGwOZSrFayI
Great article. The provocative clothing excuse jumped out because I have heard that all my female life as a way to explain and excuse male aggressors; those who exert power over others. In fact, I can relate to everything being said by those interviewed for this story who have been victims fighting off and for self-sovereignty. The historical legacy RE subterfuge and signaling is a nuance worthy of note for how it may still affect behavior. Could it also be factoring in by way of excuse?
“San Francisco Supervisor Rafael Mandelman, who is gay and currently represents District 8, which includes the Castro, inflamed the conversation when he told the Standard, “I think sexual assault occurs differently [in the gay community] and there’s a different threshold.”
It is often said that politicians get into more trouble for telling the truth than they do for lying.
The point of the article is that even within the gay nightlife scene Mandelman’s views are a minority opinion, especially so with younger generations. His remarks are tone deaf and dismissive and will be a detriment to his career trajectory. He has no further explanation and refused to show his face to a persistent reporter. A politician should make remarks they can stand behind and defend, Mandelman made remarks he now cowers from.
Being popular is not the same as being right. Personally I prefer a politician who has the courage to tell the truth even if it gets him a bad press occasionally.
But I am more annoyed about no longer having a D8 candidate that I can in good conscience vote for. D8 deserves a high-profile moderate as supervisor and now we won’t get one. Manny was the obvious successor to Wiener and Mandelman, and I will be voting for him anyway.
I’m sure you are disappointed, but least you can still visit Manny at the cafe, bingo night or something.
Make sure you use the extra big crayons when you write your name on your ballot. I’m glad my vote and the votes of our household will more than cover yours up. Even if Manny is elected, he won’t be seated.
But if Manny wins and then stands down, the Mayor gets to pick the Supe, and that will be a better selection than the three candidates left in the race.
So it is still worth voting for Manny.
Well, this is tough. Out of all the senerios mentioned in this article, I did not see one that fit my experience: I was 16 and on a MUNI bus. Believe it or not it was a MUNI bus driver on his break and riding as a passenger. We got to talking and his hand instinctively, if you know what I mean, went to my THANG. I aggressively pushed it off but we ended up at his place. I objected to how he did it, not that he did it. And I personally don’t believe most unwanted touches should be turned into a federal offense as the victim in the Yekutiel matter did. That said, I do not like to be touched 99% of the time. But that does not mean I will go off if I was touched in an unwanted manner. Why? There are some people, very few, if they touched me I would simply smile. I once winked at a 16-year-old when I was 50 years old. Not because I was interested. I felt he needed it. And I was right. He smiled and went about his business. Yes, some people are just touchie. Yes, some times too touchie. They are in my family and I am annoyed by their touchiness. I only draw the line when people, and in particular, Manny Yekutiel thinks we are all idiots. Finally, and for all who endorsed him and then unendorsed him to then offer an endorsement of the next candidate who has a criminal record, I politely ask that you sit down.
The line had previously been that groping through clothing had been at worst a mere annoyance. But unwanted flesh to flesh touching, either down the pants or in the absence of clothing requires securing consent. The more intimate the contact, the greater the need for affirmative consent.
Reaching down a male’s pants without securing consent and digitally penetrating him hould be prosecuted criminally as rape. Odds are that Yuketiel flees to Israel to avoid accountability after he closes his influence peddling operation leased from Mission Housing now that his political career appears to be over.
The nature of such contact is different for gay males, because the power imbalance that males have over women is mitigated by the fact two males are most often of relatively equal power. This is a feature, not a bug.
There are malicious males as Yuketiel appears to be who leverage their power with force. But there is also a subset of males who don’t have the self consciousness and feedback to see other males as anything more than objects and think that presence in a gay sexual space is an implicit agreement to non-penetrative groping sexual contact. For them, it is not an act of power or violence, but them trying to make a pass and taking things a bit too far. I take this as the kernel of the male rape gene that gay males see and can understand what females must bear.
I’ve had to use increasingly escalating physical means against males who who did not secure consent and have repeatedly made physical advances on me. I would estimate that some statistically non-insignificant number of “gay bashing” incidents involve gay males retaliating against other gay males who did not secure consent.
There are plenty of ways to secure consent. Nonverbal cues are the most common way. Nobody wants to be effectively signing a release form verbally in a gay sexualized space. It kinda kills the mood and defuses the frisson of the chase.
But that works only for those males who have self consciousness, treat other males as subjects, not objects, and can read such cues from other people.
Navigating that is part of the chase.
Alcohol, of course, lowers inhibitions, and that has to be taken into account in may gay male spaces. After 3:30 a events like Dore or Folsom Street Fair, the alcohol begins to take effect and some males get extra grabby.
The only time that I’d been sexually assaulted was at Folsom. A woman non-consensually, “playfully,” cracked a small cat-o-nine tails at me and left welt in a very sensitive place, taking me out of the game for the day. It did not appear until minutes later. Had it appeared sooner, I’d have tackled her fat ass and called the cops and pressed assault charges if not beaten the crap out of her.
But for gay males in normal spaces, the most severe response from me has been chop to the forearm with my hand to decisively communicate NO after less severe means have failed.
For many of today’s play date coddled youth who lose it when outside of their comfort zone, the bar on this has been raised significantly. And that is sad, because the process of the chase is a key component of male sexuality if handled honorably.
Consent: Finding out the other persons intention and interest.
To claim that the experience of men and women on this topic is the same is preposterous. Women have much more reason to be fearful of predatory advances than men do. The stakes are different. You were groped at a party? Did you feel terror? Or annoyance? Ask a man. Ask a woman.
Ask your SON. Then the perspective changes.
It’s a different standards because men and women are different … I saw a High School Football drive thru the Castro .. said horrible and vile homophobic sleers. Random guys pulled other guys pants down and started doing blowjobs I from of the homophobic football players in the buss . Everyone cheered and clapped when the underage boys were terrified .
False equivalence.
In short, some gay men say one thing, but you don’t listen to them. You only listen to gay men who agree with what you believe.
As a gay man in this city for 30+ years, it would be interesting to see a survey of gay men’s opinions on consent in the two situations Manny was in.
If you read Brad’s account, and I could be very wrong here, it sounds like he showed up late to a sex party, found his friends hooking up in the bathroom, then walked into a dark bedroom and got aggressively groped. For anyone else who has read it in detail, what kind of party does it sound like to you? What is the norm here as far as groping?
The second accusation definitely feels like more of a gray area. Out clubbing quite late in a gay space where a very large number of people are on drugs, and where in my experience there is likely a lot of light sexual activity happening on the dance floor already. I’m not sure if Manny’s one date with Ryan involved sex. If it did, is it OK to go up to someone you’ve slept with and grope them (or their boyfriend) in that specific moment?
For anyone that works in gay bars, how many incidents like this in your bar are reported to police? How often are police called for sexual assault in your bars? I’d be curious if anyone themselves or whose friends had something similar to these two incidents happen to them have called the police and filed charges?
Brad has repeatedly denied that the party was a sex party. Please stop making shit up. As to Ryan and his partner: they repeatedly said no to Manny and he persisted instead of respecting their boundaries. That is not a gray area. It is assault.
Your assumptions and comments betray your apparent belief that Brad, Ryan, and his partner were somehow “asking for it” by virtue of being gay men in a queer space or based on a prior consensual relationship that had since ended. That is rape culture and victim blaming, plain and simple. I really hope you can take a step back and reflect on your comments.
When someone tells you NO, regardless of the setting, you stop touching their genitals. Hope this clears it up for you. This includes: gay bars, gay coffee shops, gay sex parties, orgies, bath houses, doctor’s offices, public parks, the back of a waymo, trains, nude beaches, dressing rooms, public bathrooms, or literally anywhere else people might have sex.
It is not ok to touch someone without their consent, even if you’ve had consent in a previous setting. Why are there so many people in the comments trying to find a way to excuse predatory behavior?