You can wager on anything these days, but it’s a safe bet that nobody put down money that GrowSF would endorse a dues-paying democratic socialist like Darshini Patel in District 8.
Say it with me in your Jim Harbaugh voice: NOOOOOOOOOBODY.
GrowSF is the so-called moderate, tech-backed political pressure group bankrolled by the ascendant billionaires who, with a straight face, are arguing that they need to take this city back.
Patel is a high-energy 38-year-old DSA member and political newcomer who has been running a low-dollar, uphill battle — literally in craggy D8 — to attain office as a woman in a district where the demographics are heavily tilted toward a gay man.
Patel does have potential moderate crossover appeal. She worked in the Obama White House and in New Hampshire for the Kamala Harris campaign. She joined a nascent Doordash in 2017 on the cusp of its expansion into ubiquity. She’s also a YIMBY, but her views on policing, harm reduction and public safety align tightly with those of the city’s left.
Her campaign has, by her count, knocked on 20,000 doors in District 8. Which, until Oct. 1, would’ve only earned you a workout by traversing the district’s topography and a callused set of knuckles. But after that date, this took on new resonance.
That’s when Emanuel “Manny” Yekutiel, the far-and-away front-runner in District 8 and Grow’s preferred candidate, withdrew from the race after a second on-the-record allegation of sexual misconduct.
Following Yekutiel’s abrupt departure, much of San Francisco’s political establishment engaged in a choreographed cover-your-ass apology tour and coalesced around candidate Gary McCoy, a 48-year-old former aide to Rep. Nancy Pelosi and three city supervisors.
GrowSF did not do this. Instead, it ran a district-level poll gauging whether voters still cared to back Yekutiel and informing respondents of McCoy’s decades-old history as a homeless drug addict and thief.
Then, last Monday, GrowSF endorsed Patel.
Patel says she learned that she had supplanted Yekutiel as GrowSF’s candidate of choice at the same time as everybody else. She was surprised. And displeased: In July, GrowSF emailed her and asked if she would care to fill out its political questionnaire, noting that “A #2 endorsement is still possible.” (At the time, Yekutiel was still Grow’s undisputed No. 1).
Patel sent back a terse reply stating that she “wouldn’t be submitting answers.”
And yet, she says that on Oct. 9, she received a 20-minute call from GrowSF (her phone records confirm this). Patel says she spoke with the organization’s co-leads, Steven Buss Bacio and Sachin Agarwal.
“They said, ‘we would like to endorse you.’ It wasn’t a question,” Patel recalls. “I said no in so many different ways.”
On Oct. 12, Patel learned — indirectly — that GrowSF endorsed her in District 8. She says her first reaction was, “What the hell?”
Phone records indicate Patel dialed up the organization that morning: During a 12-minute call, Patel says she was told that GrowSF could not discuss its endorsement with her because that would constitute illegal coordination between an independent expenditure committee and a candidate for political office.
Mission Local’s query of GrowSF to gauge the thought process behind this endorsement elicited the following statement:
We endorsed Darshini Patel for Supervisor because she is the best candidate for the District. We don’t ask for 100% alignment from the candidates we endorse, but we are confident that of the three remaining candidates, her values are most closely aligned with the voters of District 8.
Our query about whether GrowSF’s principals recalled their phone calls with Patel in the same manner she did was not answered.

GrowSF has let it be known that it will put “six figures” into an ad campaign slagging McCoy, who was chronically homeless and addicted to drugs between ages 18 and 31 and served as one of the city’s most prominent advocates of harm reduction for drug users as the vice president of policy and public affairs for HealthRight 360 between 2021 and 2025.
In its endorsement of Patel, GrowSF describes McCoy as “unfit for this job,” in part because of his work at HealthRight and his decades-old criminal record.
There is a fine line between ideological flexibility and behaving as if you’ve been struck on the head with a ball-peen hammer and, truthfully, this feels more like the latter.
Patel, turns out, is a current board member of HealthRight 360 and has views on harm-reduction largely mirroring McCoy’s. They also have similar policies on policing, Flock cameras and building more housing; not for nothing did they form a political alliance in September and held a joint canvassing event earlier this month.
As for McCoy’s troubled past, he is 16 years sober and is not the only politician in San Francisco who has been arrested, adjudicated or even incarcerated for drug use and crime in his distant past.
Whatever Grow’s motivation, it has positioned itself to drop a chunk of change into angry, negative ads against a politician it clearly detests and who clearly detests it. Sounds like great fun. Maybe that’s reason enough.
As an independent, third-party entity, GrowSF is entitled to endorse whomever it wishes. So far as anyone can tell, no laws were broken here. A political shitstorm targeting Gary McCoy will likely benefit Darshini Patel.
But she’s not happy. Not at all. In discussions with the candidate, she evinces a sense of loss. And sadness. “The trust I spent months building,” she says, “eroded overnight.”
Patel pledges that her positions won’t change. But, in the wake of the endorsement, she’s no longer able, in good conscience, to claim her grassroots campaign has no big-dollar backing.
Pleasant interactions have soured; she has, in the past week, been accused of being “morally corrupt” because she was bestowed with an endorsement she had no ability to reject.
And this gets to the heart of why Darshini Patel is sad. But not just sad: She’s angry. The District 8 race ruptured because of issues with physical boundaries and consent. It is not lost on Patel that, on a metaphysical level, she, too, is experiencing these issues.
“People are spending a lot of time telling me I haven’t said no strongly enough to Grow,” she said. “Why are people not questioning Grow what their motivations are for doing this without my consent?”

Darshini Patel wants you to know that the 20,000 doors her campaign knocked on did not come as a result of any underwriting from GrowSF or any other big-money donor. Her septuagenarian parents are getting recognized in the Castro now as they make her case. Her fiancée’s mother is phone-banking for her from Texas.
The looming air strike of hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of angry, negative ads, she says, has undercut the positive, homespun ethos of her campaign: “I’m being met with skepticism now.”
San Francisco was always an expensive political town, but the dollar figures in the present day have made prior big spends look like a child’s experiment.
This has always been a mean and petty political town, too. Generations of bright, accomplished, well-meaning younger people have been ground down and disillusioned and discarded by the toxic political machinery of San Francisco, a system operated on the principle that every child can grow up to be an establishment hack.
Patel says she won’t let this happen to her. It’d be nice if that’s so.
“This is a campaign that’s run by everyday people who believe in something,” she says. “If I remember that, there’s a lot to hold onto there.”

The irony of GrowSF being told NO and doing it anyway…I can only handle so much!
The irony is that GrowSF’s seemingly rational and balanced take on which candidate to endorse is being framed by trying to make it sound like a conspiracy or like they’re reaching into someone’s pants at a bar.
If anything, I find it a bit hypocritical that a site that spends as much energy as it does supporting and empathizing with homelessness and drug addiction is implying the other candidate’s unfortunate past (which he’s clearly far outgrown) is worth bringing up anytime they reference his name, heavily implying he’s an unreliable option.
How does one empathize with homelessness or drug addiction? And how would it be bad, exactly, for one to empathize with people who are homeless or who are drug addicts? Be specific. If you believe, for example, that one can either empathize with an addict in a tent or with someone who doesn’t want tents on their doorstep — but never, ever both — then say so. Clearly and boldly.
Showing care and compassion for rampant, unmanaged homelessness and open-air drug use on the streets while also highlighting those same conditions/circumstances against a political figure seems a bit of an ethical contradiction, no?
At best, it’s a straw man argument… highlighting problems someone went through 15+ years ago to characterize a candidate, when it’s clearly not affecting their ability to run a district, is gross.
GrowSF is an organization that lies about it’s selected candidates. Watch those Phil Kim commercials – he had nothing to do with bringing algebra back to 8th grade.
So I’m not sure who taught you about irony, but the problem with GrowSF’s signaling right now is the fact that they’re scrambling to stay relevant after they BLEW it here with Manny.
And now all their little acolytes and followers who want a cheat sheet for their ballot because “it’s too many initiatives” and “I don’t have time to read the booklet” are scrambling to be told what to think again. Unfortunately, it doesn’t feel like a lot of folks around here are capable of independent thought. I’m not saying we need to agree, but have your own point of view that comes from your own experiences. I question the value of democracy when people are this gd lazy.
I thought Patel was the clear winner of the candidate forum I attended and won my vote that night. The fact that her campaign has the best political website I’ve ever seen had made me Patel curious in the first place. I thought the lemming-like shift by the big shots in SF from Manny to McCoy was typical. Did these folks even sit down with Patel?
It is a shame that Grow SF’s endorsement is a negative, Patel didn’t deserve the apparent anchor they threw on her. I wish she ran a better campaign, though, which would have helped mute it. I’ve seen her Dad at the Farmers Market holding a sign, but have not seen Patel around at all, barely any signs in windows, nada.
Guess I’m rambling, vote Patel
Her website is, by, far the best.
Hopefully, if elected, she’ll temper the “harm reduction” nonsense.
Everyone posting here is missing the point. Grow SF is endorsing Patel because she is a YIMBY. It’s just that plain and simple. The billionaire tech and real estate developer lobby want ms new housing more than anything else. Left wing housing activists and urbanists mean well, but they are being used. Fight back. Vote the resistance: Connie for Congress, Yes on I, Hell No on D.
Gary McCoy is YIMBY as well.
FYI, the vast majority of San Franciscan’s want new housing as well.
Left wing Nimbys are being used as “useful idiots” by right wing NIMBY homeowners
Vote for actual progress: Scott for Congress. No on I, Hell Yes on D..
Perhaps the most interesting thing about McCoy is that half think he is too left-wing and half think he is too right-wing.
But yes, have you noticed how many left-wing NIMBYs (Redmond, Welch, Campos, Ammiano, Hestor , Peskin etc) are also SF property owners and therefore presumably have a vested interest in housing shortages which drive up home values?
What horseshi-t. Being a NIMBY to protect SF neighborhoods from rampant redevelopment failures that have pockmarked and destroyed SF’s past glory is anything but irrational or anti-housing. The YIMBY liars who pretend all new housing should be market rate are the true villains of the housing crisis. Sellouts and liars!
The vast majority of San Franciscans want an affordable city. The real estate developer tech venture lobby has given us the opposite. Their power needs a major check. Vote the resistance.
Correct, the YIMBY tools enjoy being lied to because it enriches them also. Real estate is graft in SF. That’s why Wiener supporters are all in.
CORRECTION: 5+ decades of NIMBY-led anti-housing policy has resulted in chronic housing scarcity and the inevitably resulting runaway housing costs.
The surest way to gentrify a desirable place, I.e., one with economic, social and cultural opportunity (e.g. San Francisco) is to NOT allow the creation of adequate amounts of housing relative to demand.
The NIMBY property owners — in concert with the anti-housing (so-called) “progressives” –also known as the “useful idiots” to the NIMBY property owners — (such as yourself) are squarely to blame for the current housing crisis.
Fortunately, the youth-led YIMBY movement is turning this around.
At least this places Darshini at the center of a lead article, and that probably would not have happened but for this endorsement and the fuss she is making about it. Isn’t all publicity good publicity?
To be fair not all of GrowSF’s endorsements are predictably right-wing. It endorses Yes on C, which will spend more money on affordable housing. And it supports Yes on H which will spray taxpayer largesse at Muni. Regionally it supports RTM, another tax and transit measure. And at the State level it supports Props 1 and 3, which both raise taxes.
I voted for Darshini above the others although that was as much a protest vote as anything else.
Yeah, hard to fathom the endorsement and favorable poll are not a net gain. At this point, there’s more moderate votes to be had than progressive votes to be lost.
An endorsement from GrowSF is not exactly what I’d want in this cycle. But the Manny voters need to be told who to vote for, so I guess it serves a purpose for a few more weeks. But hey, their voting guide is a great way to know which candidates to think twice about. It’s like the DCCC, you don’t get to be stupid on Monday, back someone with consent issues on Tuesday and then pretend to be culturally relevant on Wednesday.
YIMBY tools spend all day commenting, zero hours a week building housing.
Period.
Manny showed up at my front door. He was charming and had his slogan, build 10,000 new homes without giving a sense of how to make it happen.
McCoy’s canvasser showed up at my front door and his candidate came off sounding like another “I’ve got more legislative experience,” but left me feeling like, but what have those laws actually done?
Got to meet Patel and she was the only one who seemed to understand why our city government was not working. She understood where processes needed to be implemented or changed. She wasn’t just another, let’s pass something that sounds good, but in reality doesn’t do anything kind of person… I’m looking at you Lurie.
So, yeah, Darshini Patel got my vote.
typical buss behaviour.
Is Grow SF now connected to GrowUSA which has its name on funding some ballot measures and unless I am mistake anti-Chan ads?
“has views on harm-reduction largely mirroring McCoy’s.”
Which translated from the native D8 speak means to lard up “harm reduction” in the Mission, TL and SOMA, far, far from the rarified precincts of D8.
“lard up “harm reduction” in the Mission, TL and SOMA, far, far from the rarified precincts of D8”
marcos, I don’t know if you have noticed but SOMA, TL and the Mish are where the drug addicts are, and so that is where their services are and should be located. It would be a pointless waste to provide such services in Noe Valley or Ashbury Heights.
Grow SF does by far the best endorsements in this city. I won’t follow all of their suggestions but I’m grateful for them.
This is a case in point. They took the matter seriously, did research, and ended up endorsing someone whose politics they disagree with because they believe she’s the best of a bad bunch of candidates.
They’re not just whining and cursing late-stage capitalism or screaming about issues outside of SF. They are doing work that we need. Nobody else is doing this. We have way too many ballot measures and almost no useful guidance.
GrowSF is the billionaire/oligarch voting guide for the class who want poor people OUT of SF, want to cover the planet in data centers, and want to create a permanent underclass of immiserated unemployed climate refugeees due to AI killing jobs and killing the planet. GrowSF is an abomination and people are finally starting to wake up to that fact. We’re nearing the point that the more money GrowSF and its ilk spend, the more it hurts them. Luckily, money is the only resource they have, so I hope we can see the tide start to turn.
That’s such an informative take. Now, only if we could get the same sort of thoughtful dismantling of the ideologues and platforms whose sole ambition is to extort, misinform, block, and corrupt any actual chance for substantive progress.
People act like it’s the 1960s and 70s and we’re in the golden age of social progressivism, and all of the slogans and emotionally energized chants are enough to steer our city out of the chaos and corruption that’s plagued it for generations. Turns out it happens on both sides (very much including Progressives), and people largely want real results, even if it comes from the middle.
Exactly. I use “Grow SF” as the b/millionaire class funding a City I have never liked:(…and my people have been here since the beginning. If you love “grow sf,” move to Texas like fElon Muskrate or Argentina like Pedo Theil. I miss 70’s SF, which GSF folks never experience. At least DiFi was compassionate!
Ah, it’s always so lovely to hear the nostaglic tales of nativist NIMBY boomers waxing on about the good old days!
Reading isn’t challenging. Neither is paying attention or critical thinking. Your need for guidance suggests that you don’t know what you’re actually doing.
This. 1000%
Work? These are the wealthiest folks in the City who consistently push their agenda by suggesting they care; they don’t. These are wealthy folks. They endorsed Jeff Adachi for mayor if he’d go against the unions for “pension reform.” Adachi lost, despite being and elected SF official for years. Billionaire sponsors don’t work, and could not understand life as a City worker. SF was built as a union town.
This is hilarious.
There is no substantive difference between Patel and McCoy.
They’re both firmly on the wrong side of the critical “harm reduction” issue as they’re both in the pocket of HealthRight 360 “harm reduction” scammers.
If either of these two (or the third buy, Nguyen)become Supervisors, it increases the likelihood that the addiction crisis on our street will remain unabated
Vote for Manny Yekutiel — he’s still on the ballot.
Karl,
You’ve nailed it.
When I hear phrases like,
“ harm reduction “ ,
I reach for Alka-Seltzer.
The bottom line is this.
If SF is an underachiever,
low level criminal behavior,
magnet,
i e.,
substance abuser etc., etc.,
and it definitely is,
and has been the early 1990’s,
then the very clear solution to the problem is for SF to demagnetize,
fully and quickly,
if you get my drift.
Go Niners!!
You can write in any number of candidates for D8. Don’t vote for Manny, write yourself in before you elect someone who doesn’t respect other people’s boundaries.
BK, the point of still voting for Manny now is because you believe that the mayor will pick a better supervisor for D8 than the three choices that are left in the race.
The mayor who initially picked Manny? The mayor who picked that pet shop lady? Naw, I’d rather choose someone myself than let another unelected official weasel into power, but enjoy your autocracy.
Too late, I already voted for Manny. And Scott of course.