Two people in formal attire are seen at separate events, one speaking at a podium with microphones, the other seated in a room with a red, white, and blue decoration.
Former Mayor London Breed (left) and District 2 Supervisor Stephen Sherrill (right)

The FBI is purportedly looking into allegations that former Mayor London Breed appointed District 2 supervisor Stephen Sherrill with the hopes of landing a new job at the hands of Sherrill’s former boss and Breed’s political financier, Michael Bloomberg.

But those allegations don’t appear to be making waves among district residents getting ready to decide whether Sherrill gets to keep his seat. 

While the news has raised eyebrows among political insiders, for most locals it does not appear to be a disqualifying factor in the June 2 race. 

Mission Local spoke to more than a dozen residents in District 2, which covers the Marina, Presidio, Pacific Heights and Cow Hollow. Most were only vaguely aware, at best, that an election for District 2 supervisor was scheduled for June 2, let alone the controversy surrounding Sherrill’s appointment. 

“I would like to tell you that the entire district is up in arms. It’s really only the people paying attention,” said Daniela Kirshenbaum, a writer who lives in Pacific Heights and supports Sherrill’s competitor, longtime neighborhood organizer Lori Brooke

“I don’t know that we’re going to have a Great Highway-level of resistance about this,” Kirshenbaum added, in reference to the political upheaval in the Sunset following 2024’s vote to permanently close the coastal road to cars. But, she said, “I kind of hope we do.” 

Breed’s last decision as outgoing mayor was to appoint a District 2 supervisor to replace Catherine Stefani, who vacated her seat when she was elected to the State Assembly. 

Last week, two former staffers went on the record for the first time, alleging that Breed overtly appointed Sherrill as a favor to Bloomberg with the hope that the appointment would help her get a job after leaving City Hall. 

Breed denied the allegations, and there has not been any political fallout yet. Former supervisor Aaron Peskin sent a letter to the city’s new inspector general asking her to “open an investigation into the circumstances surrounding the appointment of Stephen Sherrill,” but little else.

Mayor Daniel Lurie has ignored requests to comment on the matter.

For Erin Roach, president of the Marina Community Association, the allegations “just came off as kind of mean and petty, versus a real blow to his character.” 

When reached for comment by Mission Local last week, Sherrill did not directly address the controversy. “The appointment process entailed rigorous vetting, interviews and community input,” he wrote.

For Lisa Jacobs, a District 2 resident who supports Sherrill, the allegations do not necessarily reflect poorly on Sherrill.

“I think it would be unfair to color him with London Breed’s poor decision-making processes,” she said. 

Plus, that’s just the “reality of politics,” District 2 resident David Carr added. “I’m sure those things happen a lot in many different political arenas on a day-to-day basis.” 

Nevertheless, Brooke has been quick to try and capitalize on the story. She’s already designed a flyer with choice quotes from the articles that covered the allegations, and put out a video advertisement that says “Sherrill was appointed by Mayor London Breed in a corrupt backroom deal.”  

It could sway some voters; a couple people that Mission Local spoke to about the story said that it may influence their decision. 

“I would definitely go for Lori, knowing that he got a handout,” Karim Mahmoud said. Though, for him, the larger influence was that he met and spoke to Brooke in person at a farmer’s market. 

“I was like, ‘Oh, I’m probably not gonna vote, blah, blah, blah,’ but then she spoke to me a little bit about what’s going on, and I think she’s trying to do good, based on my conversation with her, and she’s out here grinding for that position,” he said. 

Sherrill has been getting out there, too. Another passerby Mission Local spoke with said they had run into him around the neighborhood, and teachers at Sherman Elementary School remembered that he had shown up to their picket line when they were on strike

Roach, who is not taking a position in the race, said that both candidates have been very present in the neighborhood.

Sherrill, she said, has “really has proven himself as someone who gets out there and deals with people directly” and Brooke, she added, has been “a super-active person in this community for a super-long time.”

Most recently, Brooke supported Roach and other residents who protested the 25-story Marina Safeway development proposal, and their call for a Safeway boycott

Sherrill, for his part, said on Monday that he wasn’t surprised that most District 2 voters didn’t seem to care a lot about how he got appointed.

“Voters are smart enough to know the difference between someone playing politics and someone doing the work,” he said, “which is what I’ll keep doing every single day.”

Follow Us

Io is a staff reporter at Mission Local covering city hall and S.F. politics. She is a part of Report for America, which supports journalists in local newsrooms.

Io was born and raised in San Francisco and previously reported on the city while working for her high school newspaper, The Lowell. She studied the history of science at Harvard and wrote for The Harvard Crimson.

You can reach Io securely on Signal at ioyg.10

Kelly Waldron is a data reporter at Mission Local. She studied Geography at McGill University and worked at a remote sensing company in Montreal, analyzing methane data, before turning to journalism and earning a master's degree from Columbia Journalism School. You can reach her on Signal @kwaldron.60.

Join the Conversation

6 Comments

  1. If this does not (incredibly!) bother voters, how about the fact that he was a Republican until very recently. (This is even worse than being a DINO like Stefani, Newsom, etc.)

    +1
    0
    votes. Sign in to vote
  2. Is it really fair to say “it does not appear to be a disqualifying factor” when you also report that almost nobody in the district seems to be aware of this? That sound like a different problem to me that people not considering it disqualifying.

    +1
    0
    votes. Sign in to vote
  3. Rigorous vetting to get the appointment from Breed? 12 people from the District does not remotely mean “most”. I for one consider what is being alleged here is exactly the type of pay to play insider appointments that the City was supposed to be working hard to stop. District 2 voters lets turn the page on the past several years of ethical decay and elect Lori!

    +1
    0
    votes. Sign in to vote
  4. Can someone explain how anyone gained in this transactional appointment? Aren’t most jobs who you know?
    Would be a different situation if Sherrill was just a blonde cut out but he’s really putting in the time using his political weight to provide results for
    his constituents. Lori doesn’t even know the borders of her district. Got one flyer yesterday, the total effort to inform. We do not exist to her campaign. I’ll vote in kind.

    0
    0
    votes. Sign in to vote
  5. District 2 election will come down to voters showing up on June 2 and casting a ballot. Get out the vote will determine this one more than any single issue. Lori Brooke has my vote but let’s see who shows up…

    0
    0
    votes. Sign in to vote
  6. I’m sure Sherrill knew nothing about this and is shocked that his appointment was a quid pro quo between Breed and Bloomberg. Shocked, shocked I say.

    +1
    -2
    votes. Sign in to vote
Leave a comment
Please keep your comments short and civil. Do not leave multiple comments under multiple names on one article. We will zap comments that fail to adhere to these short and easy-to-follow rules.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *