Meet the Candidates: San Francisco’s District 3 supervisor race

Sharon Lai

Economic recovery leader at the World Economic Forum, former board member at the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency

I have not made an official endorsement yet. However, I will prioritize a candidate who will deliver the most for District 3’s interests, including safety, homelessness, affordable housing and economic recovery. I look forward to working collaboratively with the Mayor’s office. 

My primary focus was on passing Prop A in the March election.  Thanks to citywide support, an important funding mechanism to deliver affordable housing was passed. 

The main measure I opposed was Proposition F. I voted yes on A, B, C, D, and G. I support the concept of E, but it should have been legislated.

Eduard Navarro

Tech startup founder

As an independent candidate for District 3, my platform emphasizes law and order, reversing the exodus, and ensuring San Francisco remains a beacon of hope and global leadership. I expect the same conviction from our next mayor. In a city where we share common values, however, it’s crucial to contrast our leaders based on their technical knowledge and real ability to turn visions into actionable and measurable outcomes—a standard I apply to both myself and other candidates. With abundant rhetoric, true capability is often elusive. Demand excellence! 

Yes on A, C, D, E, F & G.
No on B.

JConr B. Ortega

Self-described formerly homeless, leatherman, boxer

I am staying out of the mayoral race as I run for supervisor. I look forward to work with anyone who becomes our next mayor. The propositions I supported and campaigned for are Propositions E & F. The remaining proposals, I rejected. (Yes on G)

Danny Sauter

Executive Director, Neighborhood Centers Together

I have not yet made an endorsement in the Mayor’s race, but am committed to working collaboratively with the Mayor’s office, no matter who may occupy it. 

A: Yes, because we badly need more affordable housing. 

B: No, because the ballot was poorly designed and wouldn’t have hired a single additional first responder. 

C: Yes, to encourage office-to-housing conversions.

D: Yes, to strengthen ethics rules.

E: Yes, to improve public safety.

F: No, because there are better ways for us to add accountability to our drug-treatment policies.

G – Yes to restore confidence in our schools

Matthew Susk

Former lead with Divvy Homes

I have great respect for all of the mayoral candidates, but I am currently concentrating on my own campaign. Regardless of the outcome, I am committed to collaborating with the next mayor to ensure safe streets, thriving businesses and more housing.

Propositions:

A: Yes
B: No
C: Yes
D: Yes
E: Yes
F: Yes
G: Yes

Moe Jamil

Deputy City Attorney, San Francisco City Attorney’s Office

Aaron Peskin.

A: Yes 
B: No 
C: No
D: Yes
E: Yes 
F: Yes
G: Yes 

Moe Jamil

Deputy City Attorney, San Francisco City Attorney’s Office

My campaign has received generous contributions from Teamsters 350 and individual contributors. This grassroots support comes from individuals who resonate with my vision for the future of District 3 and want to help my team spread that vision to fellow San Franciscans. My campaign’s priority is to facilitate meaningful connections with District 3 residents and create opportunities for me to listen to their ideas for our community’s future while also creating platforms for me to articulate my priorities as their potential next Supervisor.

Sharon Lai

Economic recovery leader at the World Economic Forum, former board member at the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency

We are proud to run a grassroots campaign focused on people and will not accept donations from corporate PACs. Over 20% of the funds raised are from every corner of District 3, over 70% of donors are San Franciscans, and we are applying for public finance. We are careful stewards of donations and are powered by volunteers. We have only spent approximately 15% of the funds raised, primarily on bilingual campaign literature and accounting fees. We will be using these funds to power a grassroots campaign focusing resources on bilingual field operations.

Eduard Navarro

Tech startup founder

We host small community gatherings, 30-40 people, where we cook authentic Paella together. This Valencian staple is celebrated for how each ingredient supports the others to create a delicious, cohesive dish and for its ability to unite people—a perfect metaphor for our campaign. Here, we discuss issues important to our neighbors and district. All are welcome to come by obtaining tickets at Navarro.vote; once a quorum is reached, we provide dates, usually on a weekend, to celebrate the paella. The response has been great; it has aided in recruiting volunteers, raising funds, and fostering community as a grassroots campaign.

JConr B. Ortega

Self-described formerly homeless, leatherman, boxer

Ortega declined to respond.

Danny Sauter

Executive Director, Neighborhood Centers Together

I am proud that we were the first candidate to qualify for public financing, a testament to our diverse coalition of everyday supporters. We have received donations from more than 500 individuals, 85% of whom are San Francisco residents. 

Based on the latest filing data, our campaign has:

• The most San Francisco donors of any candidate
• The most District 3 donors of any candidate
• The most small-dollar donations of any candidate

We will put these funds to work to go out and talk to District 3 voters and share our message of safer neighborhoods, economic recovery, and more housing.

Matthew Susk

Former lead with Divvy Homes

Our funds have come from a wide array of supporters, united by their belief in our vision for San Francisco.

Professional colleagues, from my decade in the private sector, family and friends who trust my deep love for the city will guide us to better days, and new friends and neighbors made at house parties and during neighborhood canvassing, have generously supported our campaign.

Matthew Susk

Former lead with Divvy Homes

District 3 represents urban living at its best. It’s where the pulse of the city beats the strongest. From the bustling markets of Chinatown to the cozy cafes of North Beach, every street and alleyway has a story to tell.

D3 is a slice of San Francisco where world famous innovation meets world class tradition. We are proud to be home to not only San Francisco’s oldest bar but also the newest startups. The vibrancy, the people, and the sense of belonging make District 3 the best place to live and work.

Moe Jamil

Deputy City Attorney, San Francisco City Attorney’s Office

(1) Diverse Historic Neighborhoods

District 3 has the oldest and most vibrant Chinatown in the country, the vitality found in North Beach and Polk Street, vistas from Nob, Russian and Telegraph Hills, our amazing waterfront from the Barbary Coast to Fisherman’s Wharf and the beautiful architecture of Lower Nob Hill and Downtown. That’s why I’ve volunteered for numerous neighborhood organizations to help renters and homeowners protect these treasures.

(2) Amazing Small and Legacy Businesses  

Walk any part of D3 and you’ll find amazing cafes, bars, restaurants and our critically important neighborhood-serving businesses that represent the true lifeblood of the City. 

Sharon Lai

Economic recovery leader at the World Economic Forum, former board member at the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency

I love the intertwined histories between D3 and my Chinese ancestry. I feel close to my heritage. Like early immigrants, I have made a life here. It’s dense and convenient, much like Hong Kong where I’m from. I live next to my kids’ favorite dog park and school. We ride the cable car for groceries, take the bus for appointments, and walk to family dinners in our neighborhood.

It’s a slice of history, the city’s front door, and cultural epicenter. I’m humbled by its beauty and proud to be running to honor its history and shape its inclusive resilient future.

Eduard Navarro

Tech startup founder

• Diverse Neighborhoods: From North Beach’s flavors to Chinatown’s vibrancy. 
• Living history:  Stories embedded into landmarks and the imperial grid. 
• Local Commerce: Cafés, markets, and eateries enriching the local scene.
• Scenic Beauty: Captivating views and hills that inspire.
• Unique sloping streets: Defying engineering and parking.
• Unique ever-changing weather: Dress like an onion for wonderfully cold summers. 
• Strong Sense of Identity: The unique San Franciscan character that binds all of us residents together and makes D3 home. 
• And Opportunity: I see so much more possible; from street beautification to rekindled fraternity, brightening our city´s ❤️ as beacon & safe-harbor to the world.

JConr B. Ortega

Self-described formerly homeless, leatherman, boxer

What I love about D3 is we boast the best of what SF has to offer. Most specifically, our district is evenly divided by neighborhood cultures. I love the sharp contrast between the cultural neighborhoods. Walk along Broadway and see the two distinctive Chinese and Italian cultures. Walk down Montgomery and see the two distinctive shopping and financial cultures. Walk Columbus to Fisherman’s Wharf and the Embarcadero and see the Golden Gate Bridge and Sea Lions in the Bay. Walk up and down Hyde (or ride the Cable Car) to see the neighborhoods of Russian/Nob Hill. We are iconic.

Danny Sauter

Executive Director, Neighborhood Centers Together

I love District 3 because of the people and the neighborhoods which show the magic that can occur when people live in a walkable, urban setting with schools, parks, small businesses, and dense housing right outside their door. District 3 is where people want to live, want to visit, and want to shop, precisely because of this setting. Our neighborhoods, from Chinatown to North Beach, have a storied history and represent the best of San Francisco and the incredible diversity of people who make it the world’s greatest city.

Danny Sauter

Executive Director, Neighborhood Centers Together

My plan focuses on:

• Infrastructure: We need to make it drastically harder for cars to speed with better street design and we need to deliver these projects quickly.
• Enforcement: SFPD traffic enforcement has droppedby 97%. This is unacceptable. We must restart enforcement immediately — both by traffic officers and new automated speed enforcement — to save lives.

Better Transit: We need to make public transit faster, more frequent, and enjoyable so that it can be a more attractive choice. It’s why I’ve advocated for a Central Subway extension, protected bike lanes, and transit lanes to speed up buses.

Matthew Susk

Former lead with Divvy Homes

I’m dedicated to making San Francisco’s streets safer with measures such as daylighting and speed bumps. They will enhance visibility and reduce speed at crosswalks. Additionally, I believe the SFPD must use technology to increase enforcement of traffic violations and serve as a deterrent. These simple solutions will drastically improve safety in our community.  

My vision encompasses a balanced strategy that ensures all streets remain open to cars while integrating protected bike lanes for safer cycling and upgrading pedestrian infrastructure. We must always strive to enhance our community’s safety, accessibility, and economy.

Moe Jamil

Deputy City Attorney, San Francisco City Attorney’s Office

1. Invest in Technology

Empower PD to crack down on sideshows & street racing by investing in cameras/license plate readers in historic neighborhoods & tourist areas.

2. Community-Centered Policymaking 

City Departments should initiate projects in response to needs of residents & small businesses — like the Lower Polk Alley plan — empowering community voices without performative “outreach” & no real intention of modification based on feedback.

3. Mandated Vetting of Street Closures/Parking Changes

Street regulations should consider families with children & workers across the City. Chinatown merchants were shocked when MTA, without notice, erected weekend “no parking” restrictions on Grant Ave. — hurting the City economically.

Sharon Lai

Economic recovery leader at the World Economic Forum, former board member at the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency

District 3 has a concentrated number of High-Injury-Network streets. I will increase investments in safer physical designs, speed management, and changing behavioral norms through enforcement and education. I will use funds like Prop. L for District 3 to conduct a comprehensive safety study, network planning, and invest in:

• Self-enforcing infrastructure by implementing road designs to slow drivers down.

• Reduce modal conflicts, including daylighting crossings and expanding “No Turn on Red.”

• Technology beyond the three proposed speed safety cameras and red light cameras as enforcement and educational tools, if proven effective.

• Enhance “Safe Routes” to schools and for seniors.

Eduard Navarro

Tech startup founder

I’m calling for a decisive pivot towards a pedestrian-first urban landscape. Relying on signs and surveillance to govern driver behavior falls short. So too does SF´s Vision Zero implementation. Our plan? Broaden pedestrian areas, improve sidewalks, and enhance crossings, but do so physically. We will slow traffic naturally with curb extensions, and beautify with green spaces and street furniture. This initiative is more than a safety measure; it’s a step towards a stronger community. We must keep car accessibility throughout our city, but together, let’s make our streets a testament to our priority: people.

JConr B. Ortega

Self-described formerly homeless, leatherman, boxer

What Supervisor Ortega will do to improve road safety through my R,R&R plan is three simple things: 1. Keep them physically clean and free from debris that we find all around our city streets. 2. Repair all our roads and streets that are damaged from cracks, holes and more, to make them safer to drive on. 3. Remove and place bike lanes where bikers will be safe from traffic throughout our city. It is possible to keep everyone safe by ensuring we get street basics right.

JConr B. Ortega

Self-described formerly homeless, leatherman, boxer

I am truly disappointed that the housing debate has turned into an all or nothing fight. We all agree, we must build housing and make it affordable, but at the same time, we must also protect current residents. I stand with every other common sense resident who chooses not to get sucked into the YIMBY-NIMBY debate and say: I disagree with the veto and I disagree with the veto override. What I support is a compromise that both sides can agree on and, unfortunately, we are not close to that.

Danny Sauter

Executive Director, Neighborhood Centers Together

San Francisco is decades into a severe housing crisis that has pushed tens of thousands of low and middle-income residents out and hurt our neighborhoods. We need to respond to this crisis by making it easier to quickly build all types of housing. 

As Supervisor, I would bring forward a plan to add more housing in District 3, including areas in the northern waterfront from Fisherman’s Wharf to the Financial District. We can provide incentives, such as adding a few additional stories, for projects that provide additional benefits or greater affordability while including robust tenant and historic protections.

Matthew Susk

Former lead with Divvy Homes

I am a 3rd generation San Franciscan and a homeowner, who first moved to D3 in middle school. I love San Francisco’s unique character, and I believe District 3 is a shining example of how a dense district can maintain many distinct neighborhoods. 

We must build more housing so (1) our firefighters don’t have to commute 1.5 hours each way to work, (2) our teachers don’t have to sleep on their friends’ couches while they teach our children, and (3) our elders can age in place and enjoy the communities they helped create.

Moe Jamil

Deputy City Attorney, San Francisco City Attorney’s Office

I oppose the veto. Mayor Breed’s housing policies have become entirely radical, including her proposition to erect 25+ story ultra-luxury towers, three times the height limit along the waterfront. It’s unacceptable to impose top down, one-size-fits-all upzoning and shut neighborhoods out of the planning process.

I support neighborhood self-determination to build housing within our existing height limits and as a long-time neighborhood leader in District 3, I have a pragmatic track record of fighting for neighborhood voices. We must protect and preserve our existing affordable housing and not allow the Mayor and her allies to demolish rent control buildings.

Sharon Lai

Economic recovery leader at the World Economic Forum, former board member at the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency

San Francisco needs more housing, but we need to manage density thoughtfully and equitably. We can do that without damaging the integrity of our historic neighborhoods like NE Waterfront, which is only 1% of the city. Growth that is multiple times the expected density in a sensitive area that bypasses impact assessments like demand on infrastructure was not the intent, so I supported the legislation. The Mayor’s Planning Department and Commission, and the BOS all approved this zoning correction. 

Something can and should be developed, but extreme density at all cost without a process of evaluation is going too far.

Eduard Navarro

Tech startup founder

This is a trick question. I’ll explain why:

 – Down-zoning does not achieve Board President Peskin’s objectives of limiting change in our district. 

 – Up-zoning does not guarantee fulfilling our state’s mandate to create housing. 

Zoning is an imperfect and blunt instrument. As a result, the tug of war is pointless and gets no one what they want. As supervisor, I will use my expertise in the subject to lead with alternative but time-tested city-design and development tools; to simultaneously meet our quota of new housing and to protect & preserve our historic architecture, neighborhoods, and views. We can and should have both.

Eduard Navarro

Tech startup founder

No, I don’t support a sober living facility in Hotel North Beach. Here’s why: 

 – Our community was not adequately consulted, a key driver for success. 

 – The location, within one of our city’s most vibrant nightlife areas, could be counterproductive for individuals in recovery. 

– The use does not enhance the strong character of the neighborhood, vital for tourism and greater spend in local shops and restaurants. 

While the intent to aid those in recovery is commendable, we must find a more suitable site that balances support for individuals in recovery with the interests of our vibrant community and its economic drivers.

JConr B. Ortega

Self-described formerly homeless, DAD democrat, leatherman, boxer

The sober hotel project was doomed from the start since the community was not involved, nor is there a plan for treatment itself. In terms of the specific North Beach/Chinatown location, I do not support it. It was poorly designed, planned and executed. We need leadership that will do a better job at involving the community and to have a plan before seizing properties and forcing a community to accept something. I support sober hotels, but not this one specifically.

Danny Sauter

Executive Director, Neighborhood Centers Together

The recent proposal for a site on the edge of Chinatown and North Beach was poorly coordinated and left more questions than answers. In the days following the announcement, I had countless phone calls and meetings to learn more and try to produce answers for the community. The plan never gained my support and it was quickly canceled.

I believe a sober living environment is an important model for our city to establish to combat our crises of homelessness and substance abuse. I hope we can find an alternative site and learn from the mistakes made in this particular plan.

Matthew Susk

Former lead with Divvy Homes

No, for two reasons.

First, there was no effort to engage the Chinatown community. When I spoke with small business owners and families living near the proposed location, they were shocked to learn of the plan. The Chinatown community deserves to be treated with respect. 

Second, the city has not proven it’s capable of operating these facilities effectively. Average success rates are in the 5%-10% range. The city must hold nonprofits accountable for their effectiveness. That will happen under my leadership.

Moe Jamil

Deputy City Attorney, San Francisco City Attorney’s Office

The mayor’s proposed sober living facility was yet another example of failed community engagement and outreach to our historic neighborhoods of Chinatown and North Beach. Rather than engage in a true dialogue with residents and merchants regarding the proposal, the mayor attempted to claim victory by holding a press conference to celebrate the announcement of the sober living facility, leaving local merchants and residents feeling blindsided. As supervisor, I will demand meaningful community engagement and outreach to merchants and residents for any development, shelter, or transit projects prior to holding a press conference. It’s what the community expects and deserves.

Sharon Lai

Economic recovery leader at the World Economic Forum, former board member at the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency

I support the concept of sober living facilities as a housing option but in this case, the city failed to conduct community outreach prior to publicly announcing their plans, which made it virtually impossible to address concerns from the Chinatown, Jackson Square and North Beach communities I heard from regarding impacts on their small businesses. We need innovative housing solutions, but that should come with engagement and support from community members. Conducting community outreach prior to announcing a new sober living facility is crucial to build trust, and to ensure transparency and that all voices are heard.

Sharon Lai

Economic recovery leader at the World Economic Forum, former board member at the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency

As SFMTA commissioner,  I tripled the public safety budget, helping District 3 transit riders stay safe. I helped redesign Broadway for pedestrian safety, and advocated for lower speed limits. I reintroduced bus line 8-Bayshore, oversaw the completion of Van Ness BRT and the Central Subway, and advocated for free Muni and parking for Chinese New Year.

As DignityMoves’ founding ED, I opened a tiny homes village, expanding housing for the homeless citywide.  

Most recently, I took a leading role in passing Prop. A, which will provide affordable homes for 4,500 working San Franciscans and fund D3 affordable housing projects.

Eduard Navarro

Tech startup founder

I have presented my candidacy to supervisor of District 3. This role demands leadership and specialized knowledge, and cannot be a reward for past service nor a step in a political career. My diverse experiences and achievements position me to serve our district with dedication and insight. Choosing this path means setting aside other opportunities, a true testament to my dedication to our community. In these uncertain times, District 3, the heart of our city, needs a voice that can unite and take us forward. I am committed to being that unifying leader. Join our movement at Navarro.vote.

JConr B. Ortega

Self-described formerly homeless, DAD democrat, leatherman, boxer

What I have done for the district is to stand up to represent the neighborhood. When the board of supervisors pushed for legislation that will harm our community, I stood up to put a stop to it. When the police commission proposed new orders that hampered the SFPD, I stood up to kill the orders. When the SFPD needed someone to defend them, I stood up for our officers. Those who threatened our Jewish community, I stood against thousands so say “Never again.” Our district needs someone who will stand up for them no matter who they’re up against.

Danny Sauter

Executive Director, Neighborhood Centers Together

I’m proud of my record supporting District 3 over the last 10 years:

• Support thousands of low-income youth and seniors in District 3 through my work with Cameron House in Chinatown and TEL HI Neighborhood Center in North Beach
• Started the North Beach Farmers Market 
• Organized donors to fund and open a new computer labin Chinatown  
• Supported 40+ District 3 restaurants with a free delivery service during the pandemic

Led efforts to make it easier and more flexible to open small businesses in District 3.

Matthew Susk

Former lead with Divvy Homes

Safety is my No. 1 priority, so I am very invested in supporting my community. I am extremely proud of my experience in the SFPD Community Police Academy and my position as Safety Chair for my neighborhood association, Russian Hill Neighbors.

The SFPD Community Police Academy was an amazing opportunity for me to deeply understand the police department. I learned directly from officers about emergency communications, vehicle operations, bias training and crisis intervention.

While I think that safety starts with the police, it doesn’t end there. As Safety Chair, I am also responsible for emergency preparedness and street infrastructure safety.

Moe Jamil

Deputy City Attorney, San Francisco City Attorney’s Office

I’ve spent over a decade championing issues facing District 3. In that time, I have:

• Organized Polk Street neighbors and property owners to create the Discover Polk Community Benefit District with permanent funding for clean and safe streets, business development, & special events 
• Recruited Bi-Rite market, Russian Hill’s newest grocery store 
• Secured a permanent home for The Jug Shop, a 50+ year Polk Street Legacy Business 
• Championed opposition of an X-Ray center in North Beach, leading to the creation of Luke’s Local Market 
• As Deputy City Attorney*, fought to ensure corporations with large commercial properties pay their fair share of taxes

(* Identification purposes only. All posts and comments are Moe Jamil’s own and do not represent his work in an official capacity.)

Moe Jamil

Deputy City Attorney, San Francisco City Attorney’s Office

The closure of the Union Square Macy’s location left residents concerned about the future of the historic shopping district. However, this moment presents an opportunity to rethink, redevelop and revive Union Square. As supervisor, and through collaboration with the Union Square Alliance, I will:

• Explore federal, state and local tax incentives for adaptive use of historic buildings.
• Support conversion of buildings to mixed-use, residential, food and beverage, and event space for businesses and activities that attract residents and visitors.
• Promote development incentives offered through the city’s Downtown Adaptive Reuse legislation.
• Support the redesign of Powell Street, the gateway boulevard to Union Square.

Sharon Lai

Economic recovery leader at the World Economic Forum, former board member at the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency

We must cultivate a welcoming environment to mitigate retail decline. My work on downtown revitalization prioritizes diversifying the economy, growing green jobs that won’t be exported, and supporting small businesses to improve resilience.

Leveraging my two decades of public, private, nonprofit and people-partnership experience, I will align resources to: 

• Provide clean and safe streets.
• Improve foot traffic via event activations and incentives.
• Prioritize the retail experience with tenants that relies on in-person shopping business models.
• Relax regulations, reduce the burden on businesses and create a one-stop shop for approvals.
• Expand support to small businesses and connect neighborhoods.

JConr B. Ortega

Self-described formerly homeless, DAD democrat, leatherman, boxer

At jconr.com, I outline my plan to not only bring back our businesses, but to save San Francisco! What we need to do to revive Union Square and our businesses is, we need to shut down retail theft, clean up the streets from tents, and arrest drug dealers. We must allow SFPD and protect security guards that chase down those who steal from our stores. Now Prop. 47 prevents us from jailing thieves, but what we can do is to fine thieves the equal amount of property stolen, same with thieves who are minors.

Danny Sauter

Executive Director, Neighborhood Centers Together

I will prioritize the following to support retail and small businesses:

• Provide clean and safe streets — We need to drastically improve our street conditions for shoppers to feel welcome and merchants to feel safe as they run their businesses. 
• Streamline permitting — We need to make most permits over-the-counter so that they are processed more quickly, and we also need to limit the instances where competitors and neighbors can block small businesses from opening. 
• Attract businesses — We need to proactively recruit businesses, large and small, to our city and roll out the red carpet to those who want to operate here.

Matthew Susk

Former lead with Divvy Homes

Reviving Union Square will require filling vacant retail space and incentivizing shopping in the area. There is ample affordable retail space, but potential vendors and visitors don’t want to enter the market because Union Square is no longer safe. 

To address this, we must enhance the local police presence, and then provide complimentary parking and activation events to draw visitors back. 

Bolstering the SFPD will minimize theft, and help retailers and shoppers feel safe. Activation events like music series, ballet previews, and movie nights will attract people again. Free parking in Union Square garages will encourage longer shopping visits.

Moe Jamil

Deputy City Attorney, San Francisco City Attorney’s Office

Due to a lack of strong leadership, our city departments have sat idly by while the city’s drug crisis has grown out of control. There’s no denying that something needs to change. Proposition F presents an opportunity to identify individuals who are struggling with substance abuse and addiction and connect them to treatment. While I see this as a supportive approach to achieving our goal of a safer and healthier future, as District 3 supervisor, I will demand accountability from our Mayor and city department heads without wasting time and putting the responsibility on voters’ shoulders.

Sharon Lai

Economic recovery leader at the World Economic Forum, former board member at the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency

Continued smart investments in treatment capacity and long-term recovery are necessary; evidence shows programs like Care Not Cash have led to better outcomes. Although Proposition F attempts to improve the return on homelessness investments, it’s at risk to have the opposite effect, and instead displace more people from their stability and housing. This measure creates more reporting and bureaucracy for people who are busy trying to get better; if we make things harder, we will see more people back on the streets.

As supervisor, I will improve department coordination and efficiency to get us out of this public health crisis.

JConr B. Ortega

Self-described formerly homeless, DAD democrat, leatherman, boxer

Team JConr endorses Proposition F as a much necessary step in ensuring the city funds and resources are not used to increase drug use and further one’s addiction. Our streets have been turned into a drug den, where drug use and overdoses run rampant. As a result, all the money that the city takes from taxpayers, pays it out to users, which is then used on the same drugs that cause the overdose numbers to climb year after year. This is another much needed step to incentivize users to get clean. We can no longer pay for someone’s drug use.

Danny Sauter

Executive Director, Neighborhood Centers Together

I believe we need to expand access to substance use disorder treatment and, in certain circumstances, mandate these services. However, I am not convinced that Proposition F, as designed, will be effective in reducing drug overdoses and increasing pathways to recovery. Details of how the program will work are scarce, and I fear this may actually result in more people pushed onto the streets and exacerbate food security and homelessness.

Matthew Susk

Former lead with Divvy Homes

I support Proposition F. 

It is inhumane to watch two people die, per day, from drug overdoses in San Francisco. San Francisans are the most compassionate people in the world, but we have lost sight of the ball. Compassion is not letting our brothers and sisters, mothers and fathers and sons and daughters, die on the street.

The current strategy is not working. Proposition F is a small step in the right direction. We must utilize all available resources to help treat, but not perpetuate, addiction. We must have accountability.

Moe Jamil

Deputy City Attorney, San Francisco City Attorney’s Office

Yes, I support Prop. E. Public safety is the #1 concern of residents and businesses in San Francisco, and protecting our communities is just common sense. In my years of experience working with community organizations, I’ve heard the frustrations of my neighbors and local businesses as our police department struggles to recruit and retain officers to protect our communities. While strong leadership should achieve these goals, I support Prop. E as another pathway to strengthening our public safety departments and putting San Francisco back on track. 

Sharon Lai

Economic recovery leader at the World Economic Forum, former board member at the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency

I’m a strong proponent of giving our police officers the tools and technology they need to keep us safe. However, I’m concerned that passing these reforms as a ballot measure could have unintended consequences and make it extremely difficult to make even small changes at a later date, as it may require a vote by voters again. If Prop. E doesn’t pass, I will make passing a similar enhancement of the availability of sensible technology at the board an urgent priority, instead of legislating through the ballot box.

JConr B. Ortega

Self-described formerly homeless, DAD democrat, leatherman, boxer

We at team JConr endorse Prop. E. As someone who regularly attends the San Francisco Police Commission, I am very aware how the commission itself prevents the San Francisco Police Department from doing its job to keep our community safe. I warned the police commission that if they did cease their uncooperative behavior with SFPD, we would see a ballot measure that will circumvent the commission and give SFPD the tools they need in order to go after criminals. Unequivocally, I stand in support of Prop. E and stand with our men and women of the San Francisco Police Department.

Danny Sauter

Executive Director, Neighborhood Centers Together

Yes, I am supporting Proposition E. I believe it is a step forward to improve our city’s public safety. 

Prop. E will result in less time spent for officers filling out paperwork at the station and more time spent out in the community, something that makes us all safer. It also allows the police department to use the latest technology to solve and prevent crimes. Finally, it includes new options for community feedback so all future SFPD changes are vetted by community members to ensure they serve our city’s safety.

Matthew Susk

Former lead with Divvy Homes

I support Prop. E. I’ll explain the key elements below.

(1) Increased community meetings and (2) eliminating redundant paperwork when body camera footage exists are smart policy updates. They will build trust and save the city millions.

(3) Vehicle pursuits only when a suspect committed a felony or violent crime and (4) surveillance cameras only after holding a community meeting are more nuanced, but I believe that equipping officers with these tools for deterrence will prevent crime before it happens.

I agree with what Mayor Feinstein once said: “Safety is the first thing you need to guarantee.”

Moe Jamil

Deputy City Attorney, San Francisco City Attorney’s Office

My father immigrated to the city from Jordan with a dream for a better life. He and my mother, both lifelong tenants and small-business owners, are the reason I’m here today. A father of two, I’ve served on the boards of Russian Hill Neighbors, San Francisco Heritage, Union Square Foundation, Middle Polk Neighborhood Association and co-founded the Van Ness Corridor Neighborhoods Council. As Deputy City Attorney, I’ve seen how the city works, and know how to get things done. I have the institutional knowledge and community understanding necessary to hit the ground running and make real change for San Francisco.

Sharon Lai

Economic recovery leader at the World Economic Forum, former board member at the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency

As an important cultural and financial hub, we need leadership that can deliver. 

• Leading outreach, small business and housing development as city staff and in the private sector
• On SFMTA Board, tripled public-safety budget and brought back service like 8AX/BX
• On TIDA Board, shepherded 8,000 housing units and public infrastructure
• Homeless housing non-profit ED, delivering units in record low cost and speed   
• Currently, working on downtown’s recovery by diversifying the economic base 

My track record across sectors, and as the sole Asian-American and female candidate, uniquely positions me to serve and fight for our district’s diverse needs.

JConr B. Ortega

Self-described formerly homeless, DAD democrat, leatherman, boxer

I carry experience from the same lives led by those we need to fix. I’ve been homeless. I understand the struggling and the fear calling the streets home. Through hard work, I now live in a home and run a business. I understand the fear business owners feel when it comes to trying to keep employees safe [and] trying to keep one’s livelihood thriving. The experience I shared gives me a clear understanding on how policy is supposed to be made, not crafted by politicians.

Danny Sauter

Executive Director, Neighborhood Centers Together

District 3 is a collection of incredible neighborhoods with unique challenges, and residents deserve someone who has a deep record of serving and delivering for this community.

From my time as president of my neighborhood association, to starting two small businesses in District 3, to serving low-income youths and seniors at our community centers in North Beach and Chinatown, I’m proud of my work to improve District 3. 

I’ve rented an apartment in North Beach for 10 years, and would be a voice for tenants as one of the only renters on the Board.

Matthew Susk

Former lead with Divvy Homes

My background and previous experiences distinguish me as a candidate. I am a third generation San Franciscan, I started a small laundry business in San Francisco, and I’ve helped thousands of families achieve their dream of home ownership. 

My firsthand experience as a small business owner, success turning thousands of renters into owners, and generational roots in San Francisco equip me to engage with the community and write effective legislation. I would be honored to represent District 3 and shake up the institutional thinking at City Hall.

Moe Jamil

Deputy City Attorney, San Francisco City Attorney’s Office

As District 3 Supervisor, I’ll hold our City government accountable for standing with our communities and ensuring our neighborhoods are clean and safe. I know City Hall inside and out from years of experience in the City Attorney’s Office and as a community leader. I’ll bring strong leadership to City Hall to re-establish trust, make sure District 3 residents are heard, and address everyone’s frustrations with the state of the City. I will remain open and accessible, actively meeting with — and listening to — voters’ concerns. By doing so, I’ll demonstrate that I’m committed to transparency and responsiveness as District 3’s next Supervisor.

Sharon Lai

Economic recovery leader at the World Economic Forum, former board member at the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency

Public safety: After being attacked on MUNI and rising anti-Asian hate, I tripled the public safety budget for SFMTA to increase ambassadors, visibility staffing, outreach staff, as well as increased data transparency with SFPD. 

As District 3 Supervisor, I will: 

1. Build interdepartmental relationships, reduce inefficiencies, use appropriate technology to address hate crimes, theft and personal attacks.
2. Hire, train, retain police officers: Tackle the 600 vacant police positions and streamline the job they should do. Expand alternatives like community policing and focus the officers’ time on violent crimes, instead of paperwork.
3. Increase pedestrian safety to stop senseless fatalities and injuries now!

JConr B. Ortega

Self-described formerly homeless, DAD democrat, leatherman, boxer

Sustainability is the biggest issue we face. What’s happening now, in both our district and the city, cannot be sustained any longer. Crime, homelessness, loss of businesses and the City at risk of bankruptcy; our city is on the verge of collapse. My RR&R plan is to remove drugs dealers (include deportation) and get addicts into treatment. While Prop 47 supports thieves, alternative ways of accountability can be developed to ensure thieves learn their lesson. Rebuild our community’s infrastructure and reinvest by making it easier and faster to start a business, encourage innovation and support our youth!

Danny Sauter

Executive Director, Neighborhood Centers Together

My top priority is ensuring that everyone feels safe in San Francisco. This starts with a fully-staffed first responder network, from police officers to street crisis teams and 911 dispatchers. I will increase hiring bonuses, especially for those who speak priority languages, like Cantonese to serve our Chinatown community.

We also need to do more with our existing resources. This means utilizing the latest technology to prevent and solve crimes and getting police officers out of the station and into the neighborhoods so that we have a community-oriented safety response.

Matthew Susk

Former lead with Divvy Homes

When I was growing up in District 3, I was encouraged to explore San Francisco by walking around the community. I now speak with elders who are afraid to go out after dark, and young families who are worried about walking their children to school. That is unacceptable. As supervisor, ensuring the safety of our streets will be my number one priority. We will recruit the best law enforcement officers, fully staff the SFPD, arrest fentanyl dealers and compel all hospitals to treat those suffering from drug addiction and mental health issues.