In a surprisingly quick turnaround and execution, the city began construction on Valencia Street’s center bike lane this morning, just three weeks after a vote to launch the project.
The center bike lane, which will run from 15th to 23rd streets, will shunt cyclists into the middle of Valencia Street in a lane protected by plastic posts and raised rubber curbs. Cars will pass on both sides, and will be barred from making left turns. Cyclists will enter and exit the bike lane from crosswalks.
During construction, cyclists and motorists will share a single street lane in each direction.
On Monday morning, plastic orange cones forced cars and bikers alike onto a lane in the middle of the street between 18th and 19th streets. Workers with PG&E and the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency drilled holes into the asphalt, or painted red no-parking areas and blue accessible parking zones onto the curb.
Though the usual obstacles were present — a loading truck in the center of the road, a car parked in the bike lane while picking up a rider — the street was no more chaotic than usual.
“It was easy,” said one cyclist who paused briefly at a light at 18th Street after riding through the orange cones. The rest of the cyclists sped past.
Construction is estimated to take eight weeks. Street parking between 19th and 23rd streets will not be allowed through the end of June on Mondays through Saturdays, from 7 a.m. to 10 p.m.
The plan to implement a center-running bikeway on Valencia Street between 15th and 23rd streets, remove some 70 parking spots, and create new loading zones, was passed by the SFMTA board earlier this month.
The construction this morning made for an unusually efficient project rollout for the transit agency. While the plan to revamp Valencia Street’s bike lanes has been discussed for years, the center-running lane has only been publicized as the agency’s preferred plan in recent months.
Ironically, the rare fast-paced project has received little enthusiastic support. Cyclists have safety concerns about biking in the middle of the road on the new two-way, center-running bike lane, while motorists and business owners have expressed concern about losing already-limited parking spots. Many have chosen to support the plan as “better than nothing.”
Additionally, SFMTA appears to be short on crucial supplies. The center bike lanes will be eventually protected by three barriers: Thick plastic posts known as K71 posts, buffer spaces, and “bus lane curbs,” which are similar to rubber speed bumps.
But the agency is short on the thick plastic posts, meaning sections of the bike lane will only use skinnier flexible plastic posts, like those already on Valencia, to keep car traffic away from cyclists.

The posts will be spaced 20 feet apart along most of the bikeway, with bus lane curbs between each post. Between 21st and 23rd streets, the posts will be 10 feet apart.
That 20-foot gap is the size of a large U-Haul truck. Cyclists will be protected in some areas by only the equivalent of a speed bump, and in others by plastic posts that are easily crushed by cars. Advocates say those posts provide little meaningful safety.
“Use materials that prevent drivers from encroaching on the bikeway,” reads the National Association of City Transportation Officials’ Urban Bikeway Design Guide published last month. “In places with low parking demand, flexible delineators and markings are sometimes enough to keep drivers out of the bikeway. In others, curbs or high barriers are necessary to make the bikeway usable.”
Valencia would appear to be one of those areas with high parking demand.

Tom Radoulovich, the executive director of Livable City, said in an earlier interview with Mission Local that the center-running bikeway was not the best practice, or the way to get more people onto bikes.
“If it’s too flimsy a barrier, I think you might end up with a lot of loading,” Radoulovich said. “It still feels like it could be pretty hazardous if motorists don’t respect it.”
“Presently, we don’t have enough K71s in stock, so we will also mix in some standard delineators” confirmed Stephan Chun, a spokesperson for the SFMTA. Chun said the flexible white delineators will only be used temporarily until more K71s are available.

The bikeway, with cyclist traffic flowing in two directions, will be 12 feet wide. At certain points along the bikeway, an additional buffer area will run between car traffic and the bikeway. At the north and south ends of the bikeway, cyclists will return to existing lanes along the outer edges of the road, crossing intersections to do so.
By midday, initial signs of the construction were gone, and the drilled asphalt near 19th and Valencia streets had been patched up. It is unclear whether workers were on a break, or if construction had been halted until the cars still parked on the street from the night before were gone.
Take pictures now and say goodbye to the places you like because they will not last long. Next figure out who we can support to run for office who will remove the people who are ruining our city. If they don’t have the materials why are they rushing the job? Pure politics. Folks. Vote them out of office.
People will still get hit by cars.
Biking on Valencia has been dangerous for years, especially during evenings and weekends. I’m hopeful this solution will work. If not, we can try something else.
This dovetails nicely with today’s SFGATE article about the massive congestion and pollution issues that rideshare and food delivery vehicles have caused in SF. Where will they go now? Wherever they damn well please, as per usual. My soon-to-be former neighborhood of 40 years has become an embarrassing sh1tshow, where working families cannot own and park a single small vehicle on the street.
You are not entitled to a personal parking space and certainly not a free one. The Mission is one of the most transit dense neighborhoods in the Western US.
True, but I gladly pay SFMTA $168 a year for a permit to TRY to park and they gladly take my money while they destroy the product they are selling me. I ride a bike mainly and would otherwise spend zero on MUNI. I AM entitled, however, to move my family away from your never-ending cycle of failed “Plans”. You better start supporting all the small businesses you take for granted, transplant, because my family’s support is leaving.
The SFTMA is the same as Muni. The money for parking and transit passes goes to the same place.
We have a wonderful bike lane here in Sebastopol what used to be 2 lanes in one direction is now one lane. bikes are hardly seen using the now reserved lane and traffic now backs up an extra mile and a half during peak times…. genius.
Maybe more people should be using that wonderful bike lane then. Sounds like it would be faster than sitting in a mile and a half of backed up traffic.
This is absolutely going to destroy businesses on Valencia, create chaos, and worsen an already terribly difficult parking situation in and around the Valencia corridor.
“will destroy businesses”
Crazy, because all of the available evidence says this is false. But don’t let facts get in the way of you just blatantly making things up.
You’re right about that. I have a pet that needs to see the vet on Valencia; now I see that the street won’t be open for 2 more months. Possibly it’s time to find another vet – the office manager said that they had not been notified re: the construction two weeks ago.
‘Sick of this city catering to the bike lobby. They didn’t even want this. So when they come up with another solution. Valencia will get closed again. Bike lanes should not be on a street that’s primarily commercial and needs delivery and customer access. There is plenty of space on So Van Ness, a few blocks away.
Yes, let’s make South Van Ness a cars-only street, and Valencia a bikes-only street. That seems reasonable. It’s about time SF gets at least ONE street for bikes and pedestrians!
The street isn’t closed. I went down it just today.
The MTA does whatever it wants.A bunch of non elected morons destroying small businesses ,making seniors,disabled and extended families invisible.Taking away parking means people who come from far away will not come.The morons of SFvoted to close Golden Gate Park to cars.Did this increase museum and The Conservatory of Flowers admissions?Of course not.
Wow! this street is already a hot mess, and now a more complicated street plan, which I will be shocked everyone follows…it’ll be interesting to walk over and watch how people in vehicles and on bikes navigate.
The project has one benefit I think I can stand by, and that’s the elimination of legal lefts across the lane. That is good for reducing the conflict points causing danger and traffic chaos.
The parking issue will definitely lead to some lane blockage, though. I’m not worried for the businesses because they will get an exchange of car traffic to bike traffic, but deliveries will have it tougher than ever.
No, people who need to drive will not magically start using bikes. Some of us are unable.
Except that all the traffic that cannot now do a left turn will instead be doing 3 right turns. The risk is merely transferred, not eliminated.
But that’s actually the safer variant, though it does add a bit of extra congestion on the side streets.
No way to know if it safer or not. What we do know is that vehicles will be driving along 3 blocks that they previously did not need to. To my mind that adds to congestion, pollution and ultimately leads to more opportunities for accidents,
The improvements to Lake Merced Blvd were approved prior to this. Why no action there?
Well the obvious dangers of this plan have lead to 1 positive in that I’ve found a better bike route to work.
Removal of SEVENTY parking spots? So long Valencia businesses it’s been a good run…
Alex and all,
I live on Valencia at 14th and we should always tell friends who visit our area to either use public transit or car pool and split the garage cause it beats driving in circles like ‘musical chairs’ with cars. They’ve learned. Had party for 40 last weekend and no one complained of parking on Valencia on Saturday afternoon !!
Go Warriors !!
h.
Plenty of stats that prove otherwise. And, any amount of time spent on Valencia M-F for anything other than a delivery or a drop-off or pick-up would normally benefit from hoofing it from a train or bus or just… bike.
Not everyone rides a bike.Not everyone is capable of carrying 7 bags of stuff on a bike along with a 70 pound dog and 3 children
You’re not required to do that. Insane how you think it’s impossible to do anything without a car parked directly in front of a store despite hundreds of millions of people in other advanced economies around the world managing just fine.
remind me to check in in a year when all of Valencia has become a wasteland of closed storefronts.
That, and “Parking for Jesus”, gone. I maintain this oppressive kind of project is unnecessary while double parking and other (low key?) moving violations should be enforced.
Instead they turn driving into an even bigger obstacle course, with the safety issues coming with it
Well. that didn’t take long.
I give the city a lot of grief about bike policy here, and do not expect to feel safe on this (again, there’s a reason virtually no European cities use this layout), but it’s a good sign that they’re trying to build this quickly. Kudos; I hope it signals a dedication to taking “experiment and learn” seriously.
So, if a person on a bike wants to go to a place mid-block, they need to go to the end of the block and then what….ride up the sidewalk or in the lane with cars in opposite direction or enter lane at start of block and ride with the cars? I think this is one of the worst designs I could imagine.
Valencia St is mostly a through corridor for bicyclists, not a destination. The odd biker who wants to get off mid-block gets off at the intersection or simply cuts across when no car is coming. The lane is not enclosed with concrete barriers but by spread-out poles.
Not a destination? All the double parking says otherwise.
The vast majority of double parking is from delivery drivers and uber/lyfts, they are the main reason for re-doing this bike lane in the first place! this design makes it much more inconvenient for them to block the entire lane and hopefully gets them to find somewhere else to double park. (Such as the designated spots notated in the MTA’s center lane design). Most of the people who are walking along Valencia or visiting businesses are either finding parking elsewhere or taking other transportation methods.
It’s the SFMTA m.o. The layout follows the same ideas as the red bus lanes that cut through town, for destinations further down the route.
Walking your bike for half a block is an option, not a hardship. As a bicyclist in the city since 1976, I don’t trip on these short interruptions in the ride. Not defending this design!
How would you cross the street to go to a place mid-block now? You could be extra safe and do it at an intersection or you could just cross it! No need to overthink this. 🙂