trees on 24th Street
The new maple trees, ready to plant. Photo by Michael Johnson 05/05/21


S.F. Public Works arborists are planting new trees along 24th Street replacing the culled ficus trees. The new maple trees will grow tall and leafy, and turn red in the fall.

Digging the hole on 24th Street
Digging the holes on 24th Street for the new maple trees on 24th Street. Photo by Michael Johnson 05/05/21.
Delivering the maples to the right spot on 24th street
Delivering the tree to the right spot. Photo by Michael Johnson 05/05/21.
Planting a tree on 24th Street
Planting. Photo by Michael Johnson 05/05/21
Finishing touches on trees
Patting the newly planted maple tree down on 24th Street. Photo by Michael Johnson 05/05/21.
Maples on 24th Street
Offering protection to the new tree on 24th Street. Photo by Michael Johnson 05/05/21.
Water and food for the new trees on 24th street
Water and food for 24th Street maples. Photo by Michael Johnson 05/05/21.
Maple tree in  the ground at 24th Street
The maple tree is in the ground and now on to the next one. Photo by Michael Johnson 05/05/21.

Follow Us

Join the Conversation

8 Comments

  1. Trust me you did not miss much. The city is using the budget they have left to take the trees out, but, they claim they cna’t afford to replant and maintain them. Check with missionverde.org for some details on how they are dealing with the problem.

    0
    0
    votes. Sign in to vote
  2. I must have missed the “Time of Destruction on 24th Street” headline when they ripped out the beautiful old ficus trees for no good reason, against the wishes of most people.

    0
    0
    votes. Sign in to vote
    1. Ficus trees are absolute nightmares for city infrastructure. Their root growth can create real accessibility hazards by upending sidewalks, they can harm underground pipes, and their limbs are notorious for breaking off in high winds. I’m looking forward to seeing the maples grow and bring some beautiful foliage to 24th!

      0
      0
      votes. Sign in to vote
    2. I think that plenty of good reasons were provided (and debated, rigorously), and as much as people’s wishes are nice to listen to, they’re rarely unbiased and generally not objective.

      I, as much as the next person, would have loved to see the trees stay, but the pros outweighed the cons and they’re now being replaced with species better for the street experience, shops (and shop owners) as well as the health of the urban canopy itself.

      Progress takes compromise.

      0
      0
      votes. Sign in to vote
Leave a comment
Please keep your comments short and civil. Do not leave multiple comments under multiple names on one article. We will zap comments that fail to adhere to these short and easy-to-follow rules.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *