DA Gascón intensely mulled over decision before making announcement that totally reshuffles next year’s election

District Attorney George Gascón abruptly announced Tuesday afternoon that he would not be seeking a third term. In an email sent shortly before 4 p.m. by his campaign consultant Dan Newman, Gascon stated that he will serve out the rest of his term before stepping away from civic life to care for his elderly mother.

Gascón stated in the email that he does not see how he can maintain his family life, care for his 90-year-old mother and still effectively work as the city’s District Attorney — while also running a full-time campaign to keep his job.

“I am her only child and have the responsibility to be there for her. It became clear that launching a re-election campaign would not be compatible with taking care of her adequately in this moment of need. As her son, I must meet that obligation. There is no acceptable alternative.” the email stated (it is posted at the end of this article in full).

The District Attorney’s staff was purportedly not informed of his decision until today, shortly before the e-mail was sent. Lt. Gov. Gavin Newsom, who, counter-intuitively, appointed then-police chief Gascón to the DA position in 2011, was also not purportedly informed of his erstwhile appointee’s decision until today. Gascón’s family and close associates purportedly knew this was a decision he had been mulling for days, if not weeks — the DA’s family concerns, Mission Local is told, had caused him to miss several campaign events. But, until today, nothing was official; Newman, who sent out today’s e-mail, says he only learned of his client’s decision to not seek re-election “very recently.” 

Gascón was facing what was, by all accounts, stiff competition from former police commissioner Suzy Loftus, a Kamala Harris lieutenant in both the DA’s and Attorney General’s office; former police commissioner Joe Alioto Veronese; and deputy state AG Leif Dautch. Loftus will, all but certainly, run with the strong backing of both Harris and Mayor London Breed. Calls to all three challengers have not been returned as of press time. 

The DA still has 14-odd months to finish out his third term. Today marks an unconventional moment in what has been an unconventional tenure. At the time of his appointment by Newsom, Gascón had not tried a single case. He earned his J.D. when he was in his early 40s while attending Western State in Fullerton — then an unaccredited school — in his spare time while serving as a Los Angeles Police Department officer. 

Gascón’s supporters cite his office’s high charging and conviction rates. But those successes — and, in fact, a number of ostensible achievements that should have pleased this city’s liberal voting bloc — have, fairly or not, not epitomized Gascón’s tenure. Earlier this year, Mission Local ran a column titled, “George Gascón may be this city’s most progressive DA yet. Voters might still send him packing.” In that story, Matt Gonzalez — the chief attorney for the public defender’s office, one of this city’s most stalwart progressives, and the mongoose to Gascón’s cobra — praised Gascón as “the most progressive DA we’ve ever had.” As we put it before: 

When you think about it, it’s not so ludicrous a claim. Gascón wiped thousands of pot convictions off the books; was a co-author of Prop. 47, which reclassified drug possession and low-level property crimes from felonies to misdemeanors; has agitated against Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents harassing foreigners in state courthouses; has pushed diversionary programs such as Young Adult Court; has come out against building a new jail, advocating instead for mental health programs; and, for what it’s worth, publicly referred to President Donald Trump as a “madman.”

And yet, none of the above has defined Gascón’s public persona. On the right, he was criticized for his office getting schooled by none other than Gonzalez, who won a massive acquittal for Jose Ines Garcia Zarate, the undocumented immigrant who shot Kathryn Steinle on Pier 14. On the left, vituperative protesters, incensed that the DA has not filed charges against police officers who have shot and killed unarmed citizens, have protested Gascón at his home, his office, and any public appearance in which his presence was announced. 

“The mission is to make his life hell,” Ilyich Sato, aka Equipto, a rapper, former hunger striker, and police-accountability activist, told us in July. “To make him uncomfortable in every public appearance. The community feels he has blood on his hands and is not doing his job. He can jail these killer cops that have murdered unarmed children.”

The fact that the law is painfully slanted in the favor of police officers in use-of-force cases, that none of Gascón’s contenders would have likely filed any charges, and, in fact, no San Francisco DA has ever filed charges against an officer in a shooting case matters little to Equipto et al. “My perspective is abolition. I’m not in this to look for a better DA,” he told us in July. “I want to get rid of them, one by one. We’ll put pressure on the next one to do their job.”

Our calls and messages today to some of the DA’s fiercest critics have not yet been returned.

Father Richard Smith, a more measured critic, said Gascon’s reason for giving up his spot was a valid one — but Smith himself would have left the post for a different reason: “For me, it would have been that the system is so corrupt and so rigged that you become complicit in covering up crimes,” he said, referring to Gascón’s declining repeatedly to charge officers involved in fatal shootings of civilians.

Smith said that Gascón has been “heroic” in other ways: he supported Prop 47, which made certain nonviolent crimes misdemeanors, and he supported a bill that would have largely made it easier for prosecutors to charge police officers involved in fatal shootings.

“The problem is this repeated pattern of not charging officers when they kill people — not even bringing the cases to court — that’s a deal breaker,” Smith said. “That’s the equivalent of an archbishop covering up a priest’s sexual abuse of children.”

Gascón’s abrupt exit vastly changes the complexion of the 2019 race. Loftus — a city native, a prosecutor who has actually tried cases, a mother of three — was already seen as a formidable challenger. Now she’s the clear frontrunner. “She’s got in early and is staking out turf,” says Jim Ross, a longtime city political consultant. “The question is: Is there someone else out there to pick up the charge and run against her?”

November 2019 is a ways off, and Ross says more challengers may emerge. “You would have to imagine [Loftus] would be the most vulnerable from the left,” he said.

And who from the left could possibly pose a formidable challenge to Loftus?

“Matt Gonzalez,” Ross said — emphasizing that he has no knowledge of whether Gonzalez plans to run. Gonzalez, in fact, challenged then-District Attorney Terrence Hallinan in 1999 when Gonzalez was an up-and-comer in the Public Defender’s office. But he failed to make the runoff. He went on to be elected District 5 supervisor, lose to Newsom in the 2003 mayor’s race, and run as Ralph Nader’s vice-presidential candidate in the 2008 campaign.

“Someone like Matt Gonzalez would be able to coalesce the left around a candidate,” Ross said. “We have a history in San Francisco of electing progressive DAs.”

Messages left for Gonzalez today were not immediately returned. Jane Kim and David Campos have also been bandied about as early potential left-leaning contenders, and neither has yet ruled out the possibility.



October 2, 2018 – SAN FRANCISCO — District Attorney George Gascón issued the following statement to San Franciscans:

The past eight years as your District Attorney have been some of the most professionally rewarding years of my life. You trusted me to lead our work on criminal justice reform and public safety, and I have been humbled to serve you. We have accomplished so much together.

I was fortunate to assume the office after Senator Kamala Harris. Her smart on crime approach resonated with me and mirrored my reasons for accepting the role. I have worked hard to bring meaningful improvements and reforms to the office. With your help, we cut the homicide rate in half. Violent crime is down across the city and we have made needed progress to reduce property crime. With the help of the men and women in my office, we created the Crime Strategies Unit – a unit focused on stopping the most prolific criminals using crime analysis tools and data, and the Independent Investigations Bureau – created to help investigate and prosecute illegal use of force by law enforcement. In addition to these important crime fighting efforts, we created the nation’s first Young Adult Court focused on helping eighteen to twenty-five-year-old offenders turn their lives around. Against the tide of nearly all prosecutors around the state, we also took the lead in proactively dismissing old marijuana convictions. This leadership encouraged many DAs to join our effort and resulted in state legislation that will help people erase their old convictions which will allow them to find employment and housing and improve their own lives and their community.

The job of District Attorney is an enormous responsibility. It requires doing the right thing, even when it is unpopular, perhaps especially when it is unpopular. To do it well requires a serious commitment of time and energy. I have been able to do that because of the support of my family. The women in my life have made countless sacrifices for my career. My amazing wife Fabiola, whose energy and support inspires my every move; my daughters – the pride of my life; and my mother, a true warrior who nourished my development and growth in every conceivable way, are the most important people in my world. I recognize that without these strong women in my life, and my late father, who gave up so much for me, I would not be a fraction of the man I am today. Every achievement, every accomplishment, I owe to their unwavering love and support.

I have asked so much of them over the years. After two successful elections, I began preparation for a third full term. Knowing full well what is involved in running a winning campaign, my mother’s weakened health weighed heavily on my mind. She is ninety years old and has much greater needs than when I took office. I am her only child and have the responsibility to be there for her. It became clear that launching a re-election campaign would not be compatible with taking care of her adequately in this moment of need. As her son, I must meet that obligation. There is no acceptable alternative.

At this time, I simply cannot be the son I want to be and seek a third term. My career means a great deal to me. But success in the world with a family in chaos is not a choice I am willing to make. It is difficult to step away, especially when we are experiencing so much success and progress. I am flattered by the robust and diverse support for my campaign and it will be hard to walk away from that. But, at this time in my life, it is the only choice I am certain I can live with.

I will fulfill the last year of my term and then allow the voters to choose my successor. I am honored to be your District Attorney. I look forward to completing my term and to a continued role in public service. I hope and expect whoever is the next District Attorney of San Francisco will continue these efforts and carry forward the legacy of the great work done in this office. Whoever it is will have my full support in the transition.

Thank you for your continued support as my family and I navigate this next phase.