Supervisor David Campos reminded hundreds of supporters at his reelection campaign kickoff party Thursday night that he would look out for all San Franciscans — those with money as well as those in need.

As Aurora Grajeda, a Mission resident since 1969, walked into the rally at 780 Cafe, she said, “He’s one of the good ones. You know, as far as elected officials go.”

Grajeda joined a crowd of some 200 supporters, according to estimates by campaign staff, who packed the cafe to watch Campos and his backers Supervisor John Avalos and Assemblyman Tom Ammiano launch his campaign for the District 9 seat on San Francisco’s Board of Supervisors.

Supporters stream in to 780 Café to see David Campos.

In his brief speech, Campos asked for support and enumerated some of his accomplishments over the past four years — providing discounted Muni passes for youth, ending restaurant abuse of health care surcharges, preventing the deportation of undocumented youth and stopping foreclosures.

While Campos was the man of the night, the word of the night was progressive.

Both Avalos and Ammiano, who helped introduce Campos, highlighted the need for progressive politicians.

“We need to fight back against gentrification,” said Avalos, emphasizing that he and Campos have worked to represent the community on the Board of Supervisors.

Ammiano, who took the stage in a white linen suit, peppered his speech with such one-liners as, “It’s 104 in Sacramento — the IQ, I mean.”

“There were those who said he was not progressive enough. He has put them to shame,” said Ammiano, referring to Campos. “We need a progressive agenda. Campos is embraced by a younger generation. These are people who can carry the message.”

Campos defined progressive politics as being true to one’s principles and inclusive of different perspectives and people.

“At the end of the day, we want to have a San Francisco that works for every person that lives here — the person that has the most money but a San Francisco that is also defined by how well those that have the least are doing,” he said.

Brian Davis, project director for Freedom from Tobacco, attended the rally even though he is not a District 9 resident.

“[Campos] comes across like he really wants to talk to you. He listens,” Davis said.

Another supporter, Laurel Muñiz, concurred.

“I really appreciate his sense of justice, warmth and ability to listen and hear all sides. You always know that he really stands on the side of the people and seeks justice for immigrants, those with low income and people of color.”

Supporters from a variety of backgrounds — union workers, Latino businessmen, LGBT activists, seasoned politicians — turned out for the rally.

“The work that we have done has been driven by community stories,” said Campos.

As the incumbent, Campos faces a very different race from the one he ran four years ago to represent the Mission, Bernal Heights and Portola districts. Then he had six challengers, including fellow progressive candidates Mark Sanchez and the late Eric Quezada.

Campos hugs supporter and fellow Supervisor John Avalos as Assemblyman Tom Ammiano speaks to supporters.

As Campos greeted supporters Thursday night, he was still unsure if he will face a challenger this November.

“We are running this campaign like we are 20 points behind,” he said. “This campaign is not just about my reelection but also about the progressive movement.”

“We love District 9 and will run a full campaign even if there is no challenger,” said Tom Temprano, the Campos campaign’s communications director. “This gives folks a chance to get to know David and his work better.”

As the rally drew to a close, some supporters fanned themselves, stifled by the heat from so many bodies.

“This is the best job I have ever had,” said Campos. “Thank you for the opportunity.”

Follow Us

Join the Conversation

25 Comments

  1. Muni is broke and can’t run a bus on time, and his answer is free rides for youth, even if they’re not poor. His other big issues as stated in this artcle are either trivial or not really city issues. No mention of crime prevention or basic city services.

    0
    0
    votes. Sign in to vote
    1. I am just going to throw this out there. No transit agency in the country really makes money off of fares. The majority of funding for public transportation (much like all transportation) comes from the federal government – i.e. federal taxes.

      Offering free Muni for underpriviledged youth provides an option for these kids to actually get to school. It’s been proven time and time again that education and education based programs deter crime. This has been witnessed in cities across the world. It seems that the supervisor does care about crime, and does care about gangs, but he also realizees that there are indirect ways of combating crime.

      As far as other things go, if you have a problem, you should totally reach out to your elected officials. It really does do a number. Hell, before moving to SF, my neighbors and I stopped a massive multi-resident/multi-business destroying development just by being vocal and involves with city leaders. It’s really worth getting in touch.

      0
      0
      votes. Sign in to vote
      1. “Hell, before moving to SF, my neighbors and I stopped a massive multi-resident/multi-business destroying development just by being vocal and involves with city leaders. It’s really worth getting in touch.”

        HAHA! Ya that would never happen in SF these days, so welcome to the city JACK!

        0
        0
        votes. Sign in to vote
  2. this guy.

    He needs a swift kick in the ass and Mission Locals need to wield the boot. I’m opting for steelcaps.

    This Supervisor, whose district is the Mission, is responsible for the street lights, speed bumps, cameras and other tools that can help make this district safer.

    He isn’t doing a thing, so far.

    Please help me remind him how important we are.

    Email AND call.

    Let him know that this area needs MORE STREET LIGHTING (especially on Capp, San Carlos and Lexington Streets, from 24-16th.

    Tell him we need SPEED HUMPS along San Carlos and Lexington (from 21-17th)

    Tell him that there need to be consistant foot patrols from police, day and night.

    Tell him that when concerned citizens call for help they want to be taken seriously and followed up with. Or there will be a vigilante state alongside this one of gang warfare.

    City Hall
    1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place, Room 244
    San Francisco, Ca 94102-4689
    (415) 554-5144 – Voice
    (415) 554-6255 – Fax
    David.Campos@sfgov.org

    Aides: Sheila Chung Hagen, Hillary Ronen

    email contact form: http://www.sfbos.org/index.aspx?page=2129

    0
    0
    votes. Sign in to vote
    1. Zoe, you have really captured the essence of Campos. Everything he boasts as accomplishments have nothing to do with District 9. I’ve lived her six year and can tell you the quality of life isn’t much better.

      19th and Lexington are my cross streets. Here’s a report of the last year (four block radius): two murders, one female abduction, incredibly potholed streets, massively delayed park construction, garbage continuously strewn on the street, 3-5 homeless people camping out daily, graffiti once a week.

      This neighborhood is no better than it was four years ago. And with the number of new buildings and increased property taxes that is a robbery of taxpayers.

      Campos does not care about the middle class. Another neighbor and I sent him numerous requests for a meeting and he ignored us. It took more than 4 months to get scheduled and then he never followed through on his promises to us. Who is he, the Pope?

      He’s a special interest guy, illegal alients, unions, the poor, people of color, and LGBTs. Middle class families are a forgotten segment in Campos’ District.

      I loved Avolos comment about gentrification being bad. I guess that means keep the feces on the pavement in the Mission? Is the Mission as skid row what’s best for San Francisco??

      0
      0
      votes. Sign in to vote
    2. Just remember you’re dealing with a guy running unopposed who doesn’t need to answer to his constituents at all (and who hasn’t been doing so, from the concerned comments I’ve read on this site) who sees gentrification as the #1 problem facing the Mission, not crime, gang violence, quality of life, but ‘gentrification’.

      0
      0
      votes. Sign in to vote
  3. he better put some more lighting and speed humps and other “gentrification” around this neighborhood to prevent the slew of rapes and murders and muggings that we are facing.

    0
    0
    votes. Sign in to vote
  4. 4 years ago Campos only won by a little over 200 votes. Pitiful. He probably would not have won if there had been a run-off instead of ranked-choice; look @ what Oakland got with that! Since that time, the Mission has gotten worse; that section of District 9 is one of the most blighted, crime-infested ghetto traps in SF. I’ve been a resident of Bernal Heights for 12 years & glad to see the upgrade in BH. However, this has not been done because of him. It is due in most part of educated, white-collar professionals moving in, buying & improving their property, becoming homeowners, opening businesses that improve the area instead of the usual schlock, investing in the community.

    0
    0
    votes. Sign in to vote
  5. Whatever. Campos is killing it which is why no one can face him. All bow down to his supremacy!

    The two highest vote getters 4 years ago ran to the left of him. I’m sorry you moved to the mission a week ago and so your only perspective is when you ride through your hood on the google bus.

    Laughing at all y’all.

    0
    0
    votes. Sign in to vote
    1. Is he “killing it” as you say, or are people just completely disengaged and have given up hope that there can be a elected official in this town that isn’t corrupt and beholden to the “non-profits” and special interests that keep the political machine’s gears turning?

      0
      0
      votes. Sign in to vote
    2. Campos should have a campaign sign “Keeping Mission dirty and crime-filled for YOU!”. I wonder if people who support him send him a thank you note when someone shits on their doorstep or has their bike stolen?

      0
      0
      votes. Sign in to vote
  6. Irregardless of how well Campos is or isn’t performing, it’s a shame he has no legitimate challengers. The district would benefit from a substantial debate on the issues of crime, growth, housing, etc.

    0
    0
    votes. Sign in to vote
  7. Perhaps traffic safety on South Van Ness can be addressed during his campaign. It is not very sexy but important nonetheless.

    The residents of this street are feed up with the situation.

    0
    0
    votes. Sign in to vote
    1. Can you be specific? I’m a resident of SVN, so just curious what your thoughts are. I’m jealous of the improvements on cesar chavez, and wish SVN could also get a median, and maybe some slower (and quieter) traffic.
      Oh, and traffic lights that are easy to see, too. On my moving day into my place, I ran a red light for the second time in my life – because I didn’t look far enough over & notice the light till I was on it. Still my fault, but wish that the lights were in the middle of the road, and easier to see. I think it would help smooth out the traffic as well.

      0
      0
      votes. Sign in to vote
  8. This guy is the WORST! Does anyone know where he lives? I want to take a big steaming dump on his stoop.

    0
    0
    votes. Sign in to vote
    1. If he lives in the Mission, there’s a 60% chance this will happen on any given day without your intervention.

      0
      0
      votes. Sign in to vote
  9. Ugh… last of the old-school lefties. So surprised nobody is running against him. We need a representative who cares about crime and quality of life in the district, not just the rights of illegal immigrants.

    0
    0
    votes. Sign in to vote
    1. Most of the ones complaining are not the old timers.

      There is so much whining about the Mission it is disgusting.

      To the commenter which says to move. I will pass on your idea and stay put and enjoy the Mission.

      The crime is being dealt with by the police. There is crime but it is getting better.

      The quality of life issues has more to do with loud partyera

      0
      0
      votes. Sign in to vote
    2. Caring about quality of life and crime is taken as code for implicitly supporting gentrification.

      It’s the same atrophied mindset of people who say, “The Mission has always been this way. Don’t like it? Move.” Progressives who fear progress.

      0
      0
      votes. Sign in to vote
      1. “Caring about quality of life and crime is taken as code for implicitly supporting gentrification.”

        Exactly. The irony is that not caring about crime or quality of life sends the message that poor people don’t need, want or deserve safe neighborhoods. Progressive, indeed.

        0
        0
        votes. Sign in to vote
Leave a comment
Please keep your comments short and civil. Do not leave multiple comments under multiple names on one article. We will zap comments that fail to adhere to these short and very easy-to-follow rules.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *