Dozens of staff and parents from Paul Revere K-8 school line up to defend their principal in front of the SFUSD School Board. Some parents have accused Sheila Sammon of strict and "racist" behavior in the school.

Several dozen parents and staff from Paul Revere School in Bernal Heights asked the San Francisco school board Tuesday night to support their principal, who has come under fire in recent months.

“I hope you will continue to help us work through our problems,” Carol Lopez, a teacher at Paul Revere for 25 years, urged the board. “We are on our way to being the best we can be and the best we ever have been. Please don’t derail our efforts.”

Earlier this year, a group of parents alleged that Sheila Sammon, the principal hired last year, had instated strict policies that contributed to what they call a hostile environment at the school.

Parents and staff on the other side of the argument approached the school board publicly for the first time on Tuesday, simultaneously supporting Sammon and rejecting misconduct allegations.

“We need consistent leadership, which [Sammon] provides us,” said Jocelyn Corbett, a literacy coach at Paul Revere. “I refuse to dignify outlandish complaints. They’re untrue and without merit.”

The two dozen English- and Spanish-speakers demanded a response from the school board, which has been largely unresponsive amid speculation that the district may fire Sammon. Several parents said that if Sammon is fired, they will find another school.

“We’re on a path to goodness right now. It’s awesome,” said parent Arianne McCarthy. “If you remove [Sammon], we’re looking at a flight.”

Commissioner Rachel Norton defended the board, saying it was acting appropriately and taking the right amount of time to address the issue.

“We have taken it very seriously,” she said. “Every viewpoint is being heard.”

This year, for the first time in years, Paul Revere met its Academic Performance Index targets within all student groups. Some parents and teachers credited Sammon’s academic rigor for this success.

But rising test scores aren’t encouraging to all parents. Since last year, some parents have complained that Sammon has created an atmosphere of intimidation in the K-8 school. In October, the opposition culminated in a protest involving about 20 parents.

These parents criticized strict new policies implemented by Sammon, including new bathroom break rules and a restrictive drop-off policy under which parents are no longer allowed to walk their tardy kids into class.

Other parents alleged abuse. One said she had called the police against Sammon, although school officials said police found no evidence of foul play at the school.

One parent, Jessica Coello, said in Spanish that the fighting simply amounts to personal battles between the principal and the parents.

“The controversy is harming the community,” Coello said.

Some said that community mediations, which started in October, have eased tensions and given voice to parents who felt they weren’t being heard.

If you just give Paul Revere a chance, parent Erika Ehmsen told the school board during her allotted minute of public address, “our school is going to become a powerhouse.”

Sammon also spoke to the board, saying that allegations of abuse have no merit, but parents’ concerns do.

“I have taken their feelings deeply to heart,” the principal said to the board and superintendent Carlos Garcia.

“It is clear to me some parents have not felt valued in our school,” Sammon said. “I’m working better on reaching out to families.”

In October, six parents went to the school board to speak against Sammon, and they have attended most meetings since then. Four showed up on Tuesday to voice their opposition to the principal.

“They’re all lies what these people have said,” said one parent, Grendy Hernandez, who spoke after a string of those in support of Sammon. “I don’t like her rules.”

Another parent, Anna Jackson, told Mission Loc@l before the meeting that parents are still upset about a lack of communication, especially regarding discipline. She and others said parents are not contacted promptly when students are pulled out of class.

“I see [the staff] trying to make it look like they’re helping, but it’s just a bunch of bull,” Jackson said.

Those who support Sammon and her work say that the group organizing the parents who oppose the principal, the Alliance of Californians for Community Empowerment, is using questionable tactics.

King Kaufman, the father of two Paul Revere students, disagrees. “Initially, the district and school administration was trying to paint the controversy as a few whiny parents and an outside group that is riling them up — which was nonsense.”

Kaufman said he did think mediations were helping, and that he hoped to see the climate improve.

School officials who are trying to prove the necessity of ongoing mediation presented the school board with a survey that was recently sent out to Paul Revere families. More than half the school families — 176 — responded, and 76 percent said they wanted to continue with mediation. Only 2 percent of respondents said they did not.

Commissioner Norton, one of two commissioners who accepted the school’s invitation to visit Paul Revere in October, told Mission Loc@l that she thinks the school is running smoothly.

“I can’t say I saw signs of dysfunction in any classes that I visited. I saw a functioning school.”

Norton said she could not discuss the question of whether to keep Sammon as principal, but that personnel issues like this, which involve contracts, are typically discussed in the spring. That’s after the January deadline to apply to other schools.

“We need to know if we’ll be stuck at Paul Revere with a brand-new principal,” said Cherie Moore, a Paul Revere parent who said she would leave if a new principal is appointed next year.

One of Sammon’s supporters is Thomas Lindsay, the school’s security guard. She is, he says, “doing a great job.”

“I think it’s just really coming together as a community as a staff,” he said. “And just being a family and being on the same page.”

Follow Us

Join the Conversation


  1. Can you provide more detail about the specific complaints from parents who want the principal out? My understanding is that some parents were upset that their unruly children were being disciplined. I’ve seen some of these elementary schools where the unruly kids basically make it impossible for everyone else to actually learn. It sounds to me like a few parents are getting upset that the school is attempting to do the jobs the parents should be doing to teach their kids to behave, so the parents are getting upset. But again, I don’t know the details. Can anyone shed some light on this particular situation?

    votes. Sign in to vote
  2. I was at the school board meeting for another topic. It was quite the event and there seemed to be a fair amount of tension in the room, I have never seen so many people at one of those meetings. There are of course AT LEAST 2 sides to every story and I am glad this piece attempts to consider them. One thing i noticed was that when some people critical of the principal and school spoke, they seemed very intimidated. They were cut off by audience members, hissed at and generally seemed shunned by the rest of the school people. That was sad. When a principal gets up to “defend” herself from claims from staff and parents, she must not be creating a very inviting environment. I hope that this school finds a way to move forward and put children and families first. Sometimes the voices that are not the loudest are the ones that we need to heed the most. Good luck paul revere!

    votes. Sign in to vote
  3. Thank you Kate for coming out and covering the story. I was unprepared to speak, wrote my private letter to the board before heading down to the meeting. But, in the light of the lack of any responses from the board except one email, I became increasingly defensive and upset. We had our allotted time cut in half because there were many of us. This was unfair.

    I was relieved to hear Carlos Garcia explain the purpose of the meeting, and Mufas also reassure the supporters of the school that the board has received our letters and parent surveys.

    One of my major concerns is that this group, ACCE, is using these upset, young, impressionable few to further their cause. What is their cause? Is ACCE really concerned about the few allegations of a strict disciplinary code -which itself is reforming, working with those children it does not work for, and giving those children the help they need to do better at school?

    OR, are they promoting their own plans to turn around schools? OF course, their website no longer shows their aim at reforming schools so I cannot quote their site. But, they have a beef with the SIG grants and THAT is what this boils down to. Promoting bad press, one sided stories , and creating an atmosphere ON CAMPUS of misinformation is just a path to using Paul Revere to address their own agenda. And the kids are caught in the middle.

    votes. Sign in to vote
Leave a comment
Please keep your comments short and civil. Do not leave multiple comments under multiple names on one article. We will zap comments that fail to adhere to these short and very easy-to-follow rules.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *