Two men in suits stand indoors in front of wooden paneling, both bald, one with glasses and a beard, the other clean-shaven, both facing the camera and smiling.
Bilal Mahmood and Rafael Mandelman. Photos by Abigail Van Neely.

San Francisco Board President Rafael Mandelman removed Supervisor Bilal Mahmood from a city housing committee on Friday, a move Mahmood alleged was because of his plans to counter historic preservation legislation championed by Mandelman.

Mahmood claimed Mandelman’s decision to remove him from the Board of Supervisors Land Use Committee, which oversees housing and zoning, was over Mahmood’s opposition to Mandelman legislation to undertake a study and expand the list of registered city landmarks.

Mahmood has been critical of the move, and says expanding historic preservation will hamper housing production. His proposed amendments would mandate that any loss in potential housing production would be remediated by increasing building height limits on other parcels to make up the difference. 

Without a seat on the Land Use Committee, Mahmood will no longer be able to introduce those amendments himself. “I could find someone to introduce the amendments,” he said. “But there’s no guarantee of that.” 

But the conflict between the two legislators also comes amid speculation that they will face off in a California State Assembly race in less than two years’ time. 

Mandelman has already launched a campaign for the seat; Mahmood has said he is not currently considering a run, and that doing so would be “premature.”

Still, political observers believe he may yet throw his hat in the ring, and Mandelman said, “I believe he is considering it.” Mandelman denied, however, that this factored into his decision to push Mahmood off the Land Use Committee. 

Mahmood ran unsuccessfully for assembly in 2022. The assembly seat will either open in 2027 or 2028, depending on whether Sen. Scott Wiener is elected to Congress. Haney, the seat’s current occupant, has signaled intentions to run for Wiener’s seat. 

Mandelman, for his part, defended his actions and said that his goal is to “put together committees that are true to the mood of the full board.” He said he replaced Mahmood with Supervisor Matt Dorsey to ensure a continued YIMBY presence on the housing committee. 

Mahmood was the only supervisor to be involuntarily taken off a committee. Supervisor Connie Chan was replaced as budget chair, but she had announced in December that she planned to step down.

Mandelman declined to comment on Mahmood’s claims that his removal was related to the historic streamlining legislation.

“But I will say that his approach to my historic preservation legislation has been quite aggressive,” he said. 

Mahmood’s amendments would “gut the legislation,” Mandelman said, adding that the “more collegial move” would have been for Mahmood to ask Mandelman whether he accepted the amendments. If Mandelman did not, Mahmood could have simply voted no on the legislation, Mandelman said. 

“Supervisor Mahmood clearly chose a different course, and that is his right, but I don’t really think that’s the way to keep the era of good feeling going at the Board of Supervisors,” Mandelman said, referring to the fact that, for the most part, there has been little conflict between supervisors this term. 

Mahmood has been sharply critical of other city politicians recently, too, including a few weeks ago, when he accused Mayor Daniel Lurie and Supervisor Connie Chan of conspiring to block a tax measure he had proposed. 

Mandelman took note. “I do think there’s a shift happening in how Supervisor Mahmood is approaching his job and I did consider that as I was making those assignments,” he said. 

Mahmood disagreed. “I think to say someone is being aggressive because they’re engaging in the democratic process is pretty misleading,” he said. “I think it is more so a pattern of the president seeming to engage in shuffling the cards to avoid difficult votes.”

Mahmood has little recourse about his committee assignment. Mandelman is board president and has unilateral authority over committee appointments. 

Io is a staff reporter at Mission Local covering city hall and S.F. politics. She is a part of Report for America, which supports journalists in local newsrooms.

Io was born and raised in San Francisco and previously reported on the city while working for her high school newspaper, The Lowell. She studied the history of science at Harvard and wrote for The Harvard Crimson.

You can reach Io securely on Signal at ioyg.10

Join the Conversation

13 Comments

  1. Pretty cowardly and not democratic to kick someone off the committee because you disagree with them. “Keeping an era of good feeling on the board of supervisors” isn’t something us constituents care about, we care about action. It shouldn’t be lost on anyone that supervisor Mandelman represents some of the more gentrified and out of reach neighborhoods of the city, while supervisor Mahmood represents the two neighborhoods that the rich city Democrats would love to ignore.

    +8
    -2
    votes. Sign in to vote
    1. Rents are set by market forces. It is not the fault of supervisors if demand exceeds supply for housing or any other product or service.

      As for Mahmood, I am grateful for him ousting Preston. but he has been a disappointment since then. It seems like D5 has never had a supervisor who reflects city-wide values.

      On the other hand, I was worried about Mandelman at first, but he has exceeded expectations.

      +2
      -5
      votes. Sign in to vote
      1. Rents are absolutely not set by market forces when the board of supervisors has the power to block new housing construction by arbitrarily creating “historic preservation districts.” Especially when we’re talking about wealthy neighborhoods like the Marina that have successfully blocked any substantial housing for decades already. Mahmood seems to be the only supervisor who is actually trying to get housing built in rich neighborhoods and is accordingly getting punished for it. I only hope the voters take notice.

        +2
        -1
        votes. Sign in to vote
      2. The Supervisors are most definitely responsible as they can increase supply by eliminating all of the counterproductive regulatory drags on supply like unfunded inclusionary housing (IH) mandates and all of the various and sundry development fees that are piled onto housing development projects.

        Case in point, the City’s own Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) — which was created by the BOS — recommended reducing the IH fees to 0% in order to increase housing supply.

        But what did the Supervisors do?

        They set it at 5%.

        +2
        -1
        votes. Sign in to vote
  2. A board shouldn’t be comprised of “yes men” (or women). The committee should have diverse opinions and members shouldn’t be removed at the whim of the committee chair. This sounds exactly like the Trump admin, “Yes sir!” or you are out.

    +3
    0
    votes. Sign in to vote
  3. I’ve received pro-Mahmood polls about Mahmood running against Mandelman. To say he isn’t considering a run while his people are actively polling is incredulous.

    +3
    0
    votes. Sign in to vote
  4. D5 voters will remember candidate Mahmood repeating that a supervisor’s primary role was to “collaborate” with the mayor. D5 residents know and understand better……that the true primary role of a supervisor is to convene, listen to and make policy for their district constituents. Mahmood’s housing record reflects that he prioritizes market rate developers, real estate speculators, and the Tech agenda over his constituents. He came in the door with a pro YIMBY agenda and has done nothing to protect and preserve the homes of people living in existing affordable housing or our local neighborhood serving small businesses. Mahmood is now collaborating with
    Greystar Real Estate Partners (an international real estate developer and manager based in South Carolina) on 400 Divisadero, the old Touchless Carwash site. The feds, Federal Trade Commission/FTC and 7 state Attorneys General have investigated, brought legal action against and fined Graystar for rent gouging, rent fixing, safety violations, failure to address tenant concerns, and housing discrimination. As of 2023, Greystar had over $76 billion in gross assets under management.

    +2
    -3
    votes. Sign in to vote
    1. I live in D5 and am overjoyed that 203 new apartments are coming to my neighborhood (400 Divis), in part due to Mahmood’s actions. The rent on the unit below me went up 30% when it turned over. There’s crazy housing demand and the new units will help so much (though it’s not nearly enough). I’m glad my supervisor isn’t trying to put up more barriers to housing like Mandelman is.

      +2
      -1
      votes. Sign in to vote
  5. When people have power,
    they either use it,
    or lose It.
    The stronger faction will nearly always say,
    It’s My way or the Highway.
    A somewhat similar thing just happened on the Los Angeles City Council to a
    Council person challenging the
    Los Angeles Mayor.
    Remember,
    These are all Liberal Democrats doing this to each other in both LA and SF.
    When there is a one party
    city,
    county,
    state, or
    national government,
    that party will very quickly divide into factions.
    And the stronger faction will demand fealty from the weaker faction.
    That’s politics.
    You may not like it.
    It’s not pretty.
    It’s rather ugly.
    Nevertheless,
    It’s the way it is.

    0
    -3
    votes. Sign in to vote
Leave a comment
Please keep your comments short and civil. Do not leave multiple comments under multiple names on one article. We will zap comments that fail to adhere to these short and easy-to-follow rules.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *