Empty tennis courts at Dolores Park. Photo by Kerim Harmanci on May 8, 2020

The San Francisco Recreation and Parks Department has proposed a $5 reservation fee for more than half of its public tennis and pickleball courts, and some residents are fighting back.  

The hourly fee would only apply to reservations. Sixty-seven of 123 tennis courts and 41 of 67 pickleball courts can be reserved; the rest are walk-up only. “All our courts — even the reservable ones — are free to use on a walk-up basis if they’re not already in use,” the department wrote, and that would continue.

But a group of tennis and pickleball players, in a rare alliance, are fighting the fees, saying they would change who can afford to reserve courts and put the city on a slippery slope towards limiting public access. A petition to stop the proposal has gathered about 1,200 signatures. 

“Most of the members feel that the community wouldn’t be the same,” said Prince Boucher, founder of the Mission Athletic Club, a free-of-charge tennis group that hosts social games every week.

Suzy Safdie, a pickleball player who has played for four years, shared that concern. Although the department says walk-up courts would remain free, Safdie is worried that the allure of more revenue might lead the city to make more courts reservation-only.

“If they were to take away some of the open-play places to put reservations there instead, you don’t have the dynamic of a 10-year-old playing with an 80-year-old anymore,” she said.

This is the department’s second attempt at a fee: In May 2024, Rec and Parks proposed charging $5 an hour, but it was nixed at a Board of Supervisors committee.

The fees are projected to generate $1 million for the department, according to Rec and Parks’ budget proposal. The department said that the charge is “modest, fair and cost-effective,” but because pickleball players usually play more often than tennis players do, Safdie said — sometimes even five times a week for seniors — it can add up.

To the parks department, the $5 fee is “a practical way to avoid making deep, painful cuts to essential park services” as it faces a $15 million structural deficit, said Daniel Montes, a spokesperson. Those services could include basic park maintenance, community pools and senior and youth programming.

Other cities, like Seattle, Oakland, Berkeley and Santa Cruz, already charge $7 to $30 an hour. “San Francisco’s proposed $5-an-hour fee is among the lowest in the nation,” the proposal read.

“This proposal isn’t about profit,” Montes said. “It’s about preserving core park services for the communities who rely on them most.” 

That $1 million revenue would be a relatively small, compared to another, more controversial, measure to charge $3 an hour for parking in Golden Gate Park. That is expected to bring in $9 million in revenue by fiscal year 2026-2027. 

Last year, Supervisor Connie Chan urged the department to reconsider the fees and explore other models, like charging fees to private schools and sports organizations that use the city’s courts. In this year’s plan, for-profit organizations would pay $40 an hour and nonprofits would pay $20 to book the courts. 

Two dogs, one small and one large, stand on a paved path flanked by fences and greenery in an outdoor park area with palm trees in the background.
At Dolores Park, two dogs wait outside the tennis courts. Photo by Junyao Yang on April 16, 2024.

For the Mission Athletic Club, the free tennis group run by volunteers, that would mean paying $80 per session, as it uses reservation-only courts across the city. It usually gathers a dozen people per court to play what’s called Live Ball, a fast-paced, cardio-heavy game where a dozen players rotate to hit the ball and socialize. The club reserves two free courts for a two-hour window, and up to 24 people can rotate to play. 

“Public spaces should bring people together and build community,” Boucher said. He said the club is an easy starting point for an often-elitist sport. “When you hear tennis, you think of a country club, you think of Wimbledon, and we are absolutely not that.” 

Up until 2019, players have only been able to reserve courts at the tennis center in Golden Gate Park, while neighborhood courts were first-come, first-served. 

But when the Golden Gate Park center closed for renovation, Rec and Parks rolled out a pilot online reservation system at some public courts. After the center reopened in 2021, it charged $9 an hour during prime-time play. The fee has now increased to $11. 

That’s what Boucher fears might happen to other courts if a $5 fee comes in. 

“It seems like that was a pilot program for the possible privatization of public spaces,” he said. “It starts there and then it just keeps going. Where does it stop?”

Follow Us

Junyao covers San Francisco's Westside, from the Richmond to the Sunset. She moved to the Inner Sunset in 2023, after receiving her Master’s degree from UC Berkeley Graduate School of Journalism. You can find her skating at Golden Gate Park or getting a scoop at Hometown Creamery.

Join the Conversation

12 Comments

  1. How about dropping the court fee, but raising the parking meter rate to make up the difference? That way, we can keep it free for those who make the earth-conscious choice to take Muni or walk to the courts.

    +1
    -1
    votes. Sign in to vote
    1. So passing the cost of pickleball onto workers, families? Thanks, no thanks yuppies.

      If SFPark&Rec’s QUARTER OF A BILLION DOLLARS isn’t enough?

      STOP WASTING IT. PERIOD.

      0
      -1
      votes. Sign in to vote
  2. Fees are another name for taxes. And since Lurie is not about to tax fellow billionaires,the money will be squeezed out of the rest of us

    +1
    -2
    votes. Sign in to vote
  3. Capitalism ruins everything.
    Tax the predatory rich and corrupt corporations.

    They want to charge us for exercising now. Ridiculous.

    0
    -1
    votes. Sign in to vote
  4. Ginsburg was directed by Newsome to privatize Rec & Park. He’s been doing it gradually and it’s spreading. Look what’s happened to the Sigmund Stern Grove Concerts. Instead of spending money opening new parks like the UGH Dunes and buying artwork for our parks let’s maintain our parks and keep them free.

    0
    -1
    votes. Sign in to vote
  5. “It’s about preserving core park services for the communities who rely on them most.”

    STOP WASTING MONEY THEN.

    0
    -1
    votes. Sign in to vote
  6. I am against charging for public courts. I am a long time tennis player and many players say they would not play tennis if there is a charge. Seniors need to get exercise & socialize. Public crts are often wet from fog.
    How would we get credit etc.and it would be a nuisance. I also play a little pickleball. If I played 1 game and left how much would I pay, versus someone who plays on 3 different crt. What about the person who reserved the crt? How would he get payed?
    It would be a problem. These are just a few of my concerns

    0
    -1
    votes. Sign in to vote
Leave a comment
Please keep your comments short and civil. Do not leave multiple comments under multiple names on one article. We will zap comments that fail to adhere to these short and easy-to-follow rules.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *