A surveillance camera captures a city street scene showing parked cars, including a dark-colored vehicle with its brake lights on. The date stamp reads "07-29-2024.
Surveillance video from a corner store shows an SFPD officer slamming a Black woman into the wall during a jaywalking stop.

A San Francisco police officer slammed a Black mother of five into a wall during a July 29 jaywalking stop in the Richmond District, according to camera footage from a nearby corner store. The incident resulted in multiple hospital visits, the victim said.

Christiana Porter, 34, was walking down Geary Boulevard around 7 p.m. that Monday. She had just visited Office Depot and was wearing headphones.

Surveillance camera footage from the store shows Porter using the crosswalk to cross Second Avenue. Whether traffic signals were red or green at the time of her crossing is not shown on the video, but no cars passed in either direction as she crossed the street.

Footage from a corner store and onlookers documents the escalation of a July 29 stop made ostensibly for jaywalking.

But the video shows that a San Francisco Police Department SUV immediately flashes its lights after Porter crosses the street. The next four minutes of footage document the escalation of a stop made ostensibly for jaywalking. Under California law, officers can only stop jaywalkers and issue a citation for an immediate “danger of a collision” as of Jan. 1, 2023.

In the video, SFPD officer Josh McFall pulls up near Porter, lights flashing. Porter, wearing headphones, keeps walking, seemingly oblivious to the officer. McFall then drives the wrong way down Geary in pursuit, parks, exits his vehicle and approaches Porter. The two speak and begin to circle each other before McFall grabs Porter and slams her against the wall. More police vehicles arrive — at least three are visible in the video — and Porter is handcuffed and moved into one of the cars, surrounded by multiple officers.

In a subsequent interview this Wednesday, Porter said McFall asked her for her ID and she reached into her purse to retrieve it. As she attempted to do so, McFall told her to remove her hand from her purse; soon after, he pushed her against the wall. She recalls being surrounded by a group of three or four more officers as she was being handcuffed.

Porter was ultimately released with a citation for resisting arrest — a misdemeanor for which her attorney Adante Pointer, a civil-rights trial lawyer, said she will be required to appear in court. A copy of the citation reviewed by Mission Local also dings Porter for crossing on a red light.

In a video taken by an onlooker, McFall can be heard telling onlookers that he first tried to stop Porter at the intersection and she ignored him, and that Porter refused his commands to provide her ID and keep her hands out of her pockets and purse. McFall adds that he gave Porter “very clear commands” and “many opportunities to comply,” which she “refused every single step of the way.”

“Finally, when she started walking away from me, I had no choice but to put hands on her and make the arrest,” McFall can be heard saying.

The SFPD wrote in an email that it was unable to locate an incident report for the jaywalking stop and cannot “confirm or provide any information” without an incident report. But, the department said, “we generally do not confirm any use of force used during incidents, especially in open investigations.”

Retired sergeant Carl Tennenbaum, a 32-year SFPD veteran, reviewed the videos at Mission Local’s behest. He said the stop was handled “very poorly,” calling the amount of violence, personnel and ensuing paperwork a “disproportionate response to a petty infraction.”

The surveillance footage also shows a small black item falling on the sidewalk as McFall grabs Porter. In additional videos taken by onlookers, the item appears to be the officer’s body-worn camera. After Porter has been moved into the police car, McFall picks up the item and appears to attach it to his chest.

It is SFPD policy to activate bodycams to record encounters with citizens, which include traffic and pedestrian stops.

During the Wednesday interview, for which Porter’s attorney was also present, Porter said that following the incident, she noticed tightness in her neck, blurry vision and lightheadedness, prompting a trip to the emergency room the next morning. The incident left her with a separated right shoulder, concussion and back pain for which she has now made three trips to the hospital, she said.

Porter is a domestic violence survivor and had been visiting the Office Depot to print out forms related to an ongoing domestic violence case.

Pointer, Porter’s attorney, called the incident an “unreasonable detention by way of the use of force.” He noted that “SFPD has the policy to not use jaywalking as a reason” to stop someone to conduct a deeper investigation. The policy restricting pretext stops went into effect this month. Pointer added that Porter recalls McFall first asking her “what she was doing” and “where she was going.”

Last Monday’s incident is not the first of its kind involving McFall. In September 2018, McFall was one of several officers involved in a use-of-force incident while arresting a homeless man for trespassing at a hospital. An SFPD incident report states that the man resisted arrest, that McFall “held him against the wall” and that McFall and another officer handcuffed him, leaving him with two broken arms.

“We’ve already filed a complaint with the Department of Police Accountability,” Pointer said. “We’re hoping that they do a thorough investigation and also work to hold this officer accountable.”

Porter and Pointer said they plan to pursue a civil case against McFall.

Follow Us

Anne Li is a reporting intern. She recently graduated with a computer science degree from Stanford, where she wrote for The Stanford Daily. Her favorite San Francisco activity is running into the frigid ocean just to feel something. Her least favorite is trying to outrun the Muni to its next stop. (Though this also makes her feel something.)

Join the Conversation

39 Comments

  1. Is there a way to donate to Christiana Porter? What a disgusting act by that officer. He needs to be fired immediately. She’s got five children at home and is probably having a difficult time working while she’s healing.

    +16
    -2
    votes. Sign in to vote
  2. Didn’t SFPD announce that they weren’t going to stop jaywalkers like a few months ago? Due to understaffing? I’ve jaywalked in front and in back of patrol cars plenty of times since hearing this announcement and never been pulled over. Correct me if I’m wrong. How convenient the officers body cam wasn’t on! Pugh leeze!

    +15
    -2
    votes. Sign in to vote
    1. Even if they said they were going to stop enforcing the jaywalking laws it doesn’t mean that they can’t decide to stop someone who is actually jaywalking…
      Plus she was actively trying to get away from the police officer… if she had just acted like a normal person, she wouldn’t have had anything more than a ticket or a warning… but now she’s got resisting arrest, jaywalking, and impeding an officer from their duties, and probably more… like a $190 ticket but now she would be lucky to get bail… don’t fight the cops, fight it in court… it’s just not worth it…
      I’m definitely not siding with the cops either, this whole situation just sucks. Cop should have de-escalated the situation and she shouldn’t have tried to run/resist… gotta use the brain to get these cops to leave people alone these days…

      +3
      -15
      votes. Sign in to vote
      1. The officer needed to adjust his response to fit the crime. Heck this was not even a crime, just an infraction. The greater danger was the police car driving the wrong way on a one-way street.

        +4
        0
        votes. Sign in to vote
      2. Everything about that stop was wrong.

        From wasting time and taxpayer money on a jaywalker, to not realizing that this person couldn’t hear him, to getting physical when it wasn’t necessary, to arresting someone for absolutely nothing.

        He already has a force complaint. fire him and don’t let him be an LEO again.

        +3
        0
        votes. Sign in to vote
      3. Really? Tell me what was not normal about a woman walking down the street with headphones minding her business?

        +3
        -1
        votes. Sign in to vote
      4. Yes and in fact almost every time someone experiences a cop using some kind of force, it is because that person was evasive and/or insubordinate towards the cop.

        It is not that hard to be civil and cooperative towards a cop, and avoid all that risk.

        +1
        -3
        votes. Sign in to vote
          1. Although the crime is not formally called “insubordination”, it is a crime to refuse to obey the instruction of a police officer. And more relevantly it increases the probability that the cop may then use force to get you to comply if he perceives you as being non-cooperative.

            +1
            -1
            votes. Sign in to vote
  3. Unprofessional conduct from the officer involved. Fire them. Courts should toss this misdemeanor ASAP.

    It’s bad enough SFPD is understaffed. Incidents like this only affirm the distrust many have in SFPD, and embolden the radicals who want to defund/abolish the police.

    SFPD: Do better!

    +14
    -2
    votes. Sign in to vote
    1. No one is going to be fired. Just remember, District Attorney, Brooke Jenkins, took office July 8, 2022, and FIRED three deputy district attorneys and one investigator who were prosecuting excessive force cases, dismissed all the cases that were pending against various officers, and then gutted the Independent Investigations Bureau unit so that it exists in name only.
      When police officers know there are no consequences for their violence against Black people, this is what happens. Rogue cops like McFall are allowed to wear a uniform, a badge and a gun unimpeded and without discipline. The terror in the woman’s voice as she screams while her face is being pushed into the wall is horrifying to listen to.

      +3
      0
      votes. Sign in to vote
    2. I’m not sure I need any emboldening, but yes, we should defund the police, and this story illustrates exactly why.

      0
      0
      votes. Sign in to vote
  4. McFall’s the kind of cop who’ll kill an innocent person one day for being insufficiently deferential when they see him on the street. What kind of dangerous maniac gives someone a concussion just for not obeying them fast enough?

    +14
    -2
    votes. Sign in to vote
  5. Jay-walking isn’t a crime, but assault and battery against a pedestrian is. We should not tolerate this type of aggressive behavior by the SFPD. Why was this necessary? Why aren’t there any consequences for SFPD thugs who do this sort of thing time and time and time again, bankrupting our city with lawsuits and their million dollar settlements? If any SFPD ever causes a tax payer settlement because of their actions, they should be fired, arrested, and loose their pension. WTF do we coddle this behavior by continuing to employ dirty cops who cause all this horrific mayhem on such a regular basis?

    +13
    -2
    votes. Sign in to vote
  6. I don’t know how many times I’ve left this comment after an online story like this. THE COPS CAN’T HELP THEMSELVES!

    After the passage of Prop. E, they can operate a reign of terror if they want. From the ACLU: “A review of SFPD data found that in the last quarter of 2022, the department was 25 times more likely to use force on Black people than on white people.”

    Be safe out there, folks!

    +10
    -1
    votes. Sign in to vote
  7. This is ridiculous, meanwhile Mission District is attacked by thieves,stabbing,shooting,people reporting guys with guns,knives, police shows up but when the perpetrators are miles away.Sfpd sucks!

    +6
    0
    votes. Sign in to vote
  8. SFPD is emboldened now that they know that the new would be crypto swindler ruling class has its back and they’re acting accordingly.

    How many cops did SFPD send as backup for this travesty?

    Meanwhile, back in the Mission, SFPD cannot be bothered to meet with neighbors as violent crime skyrockets but can find time to milk OT to not stop the Hill Bomb, their response to which last year exposed the City to civil rights legal liability.

    Apparently the entire SFPD shut down for two weeks in mourning for a cop who died young while playing rugby.

    SFPD is not understaffed. SFPD is functioning just as SFPOA wants it to. More money for more SFPD cops means more of these brutal law enforcement farces.

    +9
    -4
    votes. Sign in to vote
  9. How is she supposed to give him her ID while keeping her hands out of her purse and pockets? What am I missing here? Seems impossible to comply.

    +6
    -1
    votes. Sign in to vote
    1. reminds me of the contradictory orders of officers when asking for ID while telling them to freeze and keep their hands where they can see them. Its sad that no matter what you try to do, you will not be able to follow orders and that gives the officers justification to escalate to use of force.

      +1
      0
      votes. Sign in to vote
  10. Cops observe actual crimes being committed and they do NOTHING.
    And this happens all the time in SF. But then they decide THIS is the one?
    All of this over her crossing against a red light when there is no traffic?
    I hope she sues SFPD and gets a HUGE chunk of cash out of the lawsuit.
    These guys are a bunch of violent bullies who deserve to be fired. This is wrong.

    +5
    0
    votes. Sign in to vote
    1. it’s the slight to his ego by seeing a black woman walk across a red light in front of where he is driving by. Like his presence doesn’t matter and so he had to force her to recognize his authority by retraumatizing a DV victim.

      +3
      0
      votes. Sign in to vote
  11. The officer appears to have a blog with some dangerous misconceptions about policing.

    For example, he writes —
    “835a(d), which says that cops don’t have to back down from resistance or the threat of resistance, and can’t be deemed the aggressor when they use force (including deadly force) to make an arrest, overcome resistance, or prevent someone from escaping. ”

    However in real life, 835d limits the officer to “objectively reasonable force”.

    https://joshmcfall.com/2020/02/22/why-auto-break-ins-are-out-of-control-in-san-francisco/

    compare
    https://law.justia.com/codes/california/code-pen/part-2/title-3/chapter-5/section-835a/

    +4
    0
    votes. Sign in to vote
  12. This makes my blood boil, totally unacceptable behavior from the police. It doesn’t matter what she was doing or said, there is no possibility that the response should have been violence.

    +4
    -1
    votes. Sign in to vote
  13. San Francisco where you can sell and smoke fentanyl, break car windows. But for forbid you jaywalk while black. These cops can’t enforce laws so they are so pent up that they lash out like this, I’ve litteraly been robbed while a whole squad of police officers watch from across the street

    +2
    0
    votes. Sign in to vote
  14. I am impressed that Gary Delagnes would take time out from making America great again to respond to this article regarding police misconduct. In spite of his factually incorrect, grammatical nightmare that comprises his word salad (and which is public record), I will wear it as a badge of honor, since it’s coming from the guy who did more damage to the SF Police Officers Association and their relationship with the community than any of his predecessors.

    +2
    -1
    votes. Sign in to vote
    1. The POA did this themselves.

      If excessive force complaints came from them or their retirement fund, I bet this foolishness would stop.

      +1
      0
      votes. Sign in to vote
  15. Officer Josh McFall is clearly a violent loose cannon, he should be fired. SFPD needs to drop any charges against Ms. Porter and compensate her for her medical bills and any lost days of work.

    +1
    0
    votes. Sign in to vote
  16. You can see that cars were turning left in the inter section so you would think they had a green light. The police car heads the other way would have had a green light as well. When she crosses in front of the car she raises her hands as if to convey a msg ( didn’t see you? Sorry? So what? ). Then when you see the next angle you can see the cars stopped on Geary. To me it’s clear she crossed against the light in front of the police car. Probably could have been handled better.

    +1
    -1
    votes. Sign in to vote
  17. OMG. I was ticketed just for jaywalking but it was not jaywalking as the officer who placed me in the corner waiting for him to look up what rules have I broken, trying to walk safely on Geary Blvd. Now this. Again.

    +1
    -1
    votes. Sign in to vote
  18. As one who supports cops, they keep our city safe, no recognition nowadays… This makes me sick to my stomach. A mom?! Like this police officer doesn’t have anything else better to do? I will gladly teach that cop a lesson

    0
    0
    votes. Sign in to vote
  19. A possible middle finger gesture could potentially result in the city paying millions of dollars in damages. As a result, we trust the police less today than we did yesterday. Sad.

    0
    -1
    votes. Sign in to vote
  20. It is pretty funny how you guys still attempt to portray Carl Tennenbaum as an expert in law enforcement . He was a lousy cop who was once suspended for havin a sexual encounter with the Chiefs assistant in a radio car and then was suspended again for driving a suspects car over 90 Mph through the Broadway tunnel.this is the best yo can do. He was a lousy cop and a thief. This is the best you can do.and you wonder why you guys lose your credibility

    +5
    -8
    votes. Sign in to vote
      1. No, he didn’t. Considering he’s referring to me, nothing he said is even remotely correct. Feel free to contact me and I’ll gladly provide you the honest, factual details.

        0
        -1
        votes. Sign in to vote
Leave a comment
Please keep your comments short and civil. Do not leave multiple comments under multiple names on one article. We will zap comments that fail to adhere to these short and easy-to-follow rules.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *