A new bar, owned and operated by a Mission landlord with a history of dozens of evictions, may open in the near future at the space previously occupied by Uptown, the neighborhood dive bar that closed its doors in January after 39 years.
Four months after Uptown served its last drink, Kaushik Dattani, the owner of the building at 17th and Capp streets, is working on opening a new bar named Kiitos in the same spot, according to planning documents.
But neighbors and the former owners of Uptown are not extending their welcome to this new venture, citing Dattani’s record of evicting long-time tenants in the Mission, and his charging of “substantially above market rate” during Uptown’s last lease.
The San Francisco Planning Department has also delayed the bar’s opening indefinitely. In an email sent to the landlord, planning staff asked for evidence that Dattani is “conducting thorough outreach to stakeholders and neighborhood groups and responding to community input.”
Because the Uptown was designated a legacy business, a change of ownership requires an authorization that Dattani must seek from the Planning Commission.

Ken Cohen, one of the co-owners of Uptown, said that the bar’s status as a local watering hole was unique. “You can’t replace Uptown for being a community gathering space, and I think his history in the community makes it particularly difficult.”
Dattani, a landlord who owns multiple properties in the Mission and beyond, repeatedly used the Ellis Act to evict dozens of longtime San Franciscans, as documented by the Anti-Eviction Mapping Project. Those tenants included Hilda Lisa Vazquez, an octogenarian known by her neighbors at 19th and Lexington as the lady who woke up at 6 every morning to sweep the sidewalk.
Now, instead of operating rental properties, Dattani is trying his hand at running a bar himself.
In a five-page letter sent to the planning department last Thursday, Uptown’s owners expressed opposition to the project, blaming the landlord for contributing to the closure of Uptown.
“He acted irresponsibly and over-aggressively with respect to the rent he demanded at the beginning of 2019,” wrote the owners. “As a result, we were left with insufficient resources to continue in business past the lease expiration date in January 2024.”
The owners recounted how Dattani charged rent “at least 80 percent above fair market” from 2019 to 2024, about $9,500 a month, with 3 percent annual increase. Toward the end, Uptown was paying about $10,700 per month, its owners said.
Uptown owners were especially bitter about one of Dattani’s tactics in the lease negotiation: Demanding rent for a 622-square-foot storage basement to be calculated as a cocktail lounge space, meaning he charged $3 to $4 per square foot for “usable space,” rather than the $1 per square foot typically charged for storage space.
“If the rent in 2019 was $7,000, he would’ve gotten a fair lease, and we would probably still be in business,” said Cohen.
Dattani said in a phone call that he had no comment.

In Dattani’s application, filed with the Planning Department in February, the landlord emphasized that the Uptown owners voluntarily left “despite the landlord agreeing to give them a 30 percent rent reduction,” thus asking for “a quick and easy solution to this conundrum.”
Cohen, for his part, said that even the reduced rent — $7,750 a month with a 4 percent annual increase — was above market rate and too expensive for the business.
Before the hearing’s delay, Dattani had submitted a petition to the Planning Department in May with 15 signatures from neighbors and businesses supporting his reopening of the corner bar. He also submitted three support letters, including one from Mission Art 415, which had received funding from Dattani for the Dharma Mural at 22nd and Mission. But that has proved to be insufficient for the Planning Department.
Uptown’s owners are concerned about “the proverbial elephant in the room” — Dattani’s checkered history as a landlord in the Mission.
“It’s one thing to close the bar after so many years; it’s always gonna be a little traumatic,” Cohen said. “But it’s even harder to take the idea that we’d be replaced by a landlord like this.”
Jason Nichols, a regular at Uptown from the 1990s to its closing, concurred that a new bar would be appreciated, but not under this owner.
“When people think about bad landlords, this man is the poster child for that,” he said. “It was the landlord’s strategy to have an untenable rent to drive people out. I’d rather not see this person rewarded for the tactics.”


A tale of greed and stupidity and the power of community. You should have been more thoughtful Kaushik Dattani but were instead blinded by greed. Your neighbors and the community know who you are and what you represent. Maybe renegotiate with The Uptown folks, neighbors and community and save yourself. Otherwise: vacancy tax that increases every year the property sits empty. I’ll bet candidate (and coward) Trevor Chandler would be happy to be your tenant. Just a feeling.
A bar to boycott. Such sleaze!
Dattani is so slimy he’s been memorialized in a mural on Clarion Alley.
The only hearing is because it was a legacy business? What about the state’s Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control? Who owns the liquor license? Isn’t there a hearing required to transfer a license to new owners?
Obviously Dattani wanted the Uptown out for years and squeezed them on rent in every way imaginable. Having seen a barkeeper fixing a broken bathroom door handle himself one afternoon, I’m fairly certain this extended to repairs/maintenance as well. One piece I’m confused about is why the Uptown’s owners were dying on that hill. Even Noisebridge were able to find new digs in the area. One wonders whether the Uptown could have walked down the same road.
Thank you for this reporting. The Japantown Task Force (JTF), a pro-housing group is considering aupport of a Japantown History Mural project managed by Mission Art 415. Mission Art is also taking the lead on fundraising for this +300k
project. I think JTF needs to know who they may be associated with.
The landlord has every right to charge the rent he asked for.The bar could have looked for another site,but it appears they didn’t. Maybe the bar was a pain in the neck tenant? I don’t know.The bar does not own the property and it is just like tenants ‘s rights.The more rights retail tenants want the more they will pay.The owner of the property has every right to want to open a business there.You can boycott if you like,but denying the owner ability to open his own business by the crooks that run SF is not ok.Just because a business is legacy does not mean it was operated the best way possible. I do not know how the bar was operated and I really do not care.The owner of a property has the right to do what the owner wants to.Nowadays people inheriting single family houses always sell if they do not want to live in them.Everyone has horror stories about bad tenants.I know you do no like to hear this,but it is the truth.
Nowhere—NOWHERE—does the article mention the behavior of the tenant. Yet, the owner charged “at least 80 percent above fair market.” That’s not an honorable landlord, that’s a slimy one.
Sounds like you’re projecting your contempt of renters.
Found Kenneths burner account. Guy is my landlord and gives me the skeeziest, including comments to my partner about her physical appearance when she was going out for Pride. Find a better person to defend online that deserves it.
Dear “Tired of Morons” :
Legally, it is impossible for the owners of the Uptown to simply “find another site”.
The Mission is legally classified as a “Special Use District” by the City of SF. This means they cannot move their liquor license to another location without enormous, arduous cost and process (typically $200k-$300k) through which another bar within the “Special Use District” must cease to operate because the number of such licenses must remain fixed and permanent. Do your homework before making uninformed statements. The Uptown was forced out without any avenue through which they might attempt to re-open in another Mission location. Regardless, they should not been forced to as the business had protected legacy status.
Community meetings to harass the owner and gatekeep the next business that operates in this spot will surely make everything better.
He’s an evil man
So the hate “community” is showing it’s true values… I think Dattani is far more benign than all the serial meth users, acid window and graffiti vandals that plague the city of boarded store fronts and vanishing businesses. San Francisco is plagued by evil people and Dattani is not even close to being one of them… Revenge is a tactic of immoral people.
Not one of them.
All of us are free to frequent or not to frequent the bar once it’s open. But using community meetings to keep the space vacant for months does not accomplish anything.
It’s almost like some people enjoy living in a neighborhood with boarded up storefronts covered in graffiti.