Controller Ben Rosenfield, left, in 2008 at the goodbye party for his predecessor Ed Harrington, right. The fella in the middle, Mayor Gavin Newsom, appointed Rosenfield, who was re-appointed to a 10-year term in 2018 by Mayor Mark Farrell.

With San Francisco’s budgetary prognosis heading deeper and deeper up the creek, the city today lost its paddle: Longtime controller Ben Rosenfield announced that he’s turning over his calculator and departing City Hall. 

Like so many San Francisco government hands, it felt as if Rosenfield was the caretaker of the Overlook Hotel; he’s always been here. And if by “always” you meant nearly 27 years working for the city and 16 as controller, you’d be right. In the past month or so, he’s been telling a select handful of colleagues that he was readying to depart. This week, he braced everyone for today’s announcement.

“I have loved the job, and I have loved the work,” Rosenfield told Mission Local. “But, it’s also true that I’ve been doing it for a very long time.” 

Rosenfield was — and is — fastidiously nonpartisan. His departure prior to next year’s pending Book of Revelation-caliber budget nightmare could well be leveraged to gin up any number of partisan arguments or fuel a further news cycle of dopey doom loop stories. 

But, according to a handful of Rosenfield confidants, City Hall higher-ups across San Francisco’s political spectrum, and Rosenfield himself, the number spurring the controller’s departure isn’t the city’s stratospheric budget or troublesome burgeoning deficit but, rather, 50. 

As in the big five-o: Believe it or not, Rosenfield won’t turn 50 until January 27; other than a schoolteacher gig a year out of college, working for San Francisco is the only job he’s ever had. There is never a good time for a city controller to leave his post, Rosenfield admits — but 50 makes things nice and neat. On to whatever’s next. 

He has, after all, always been the caretaker.  

Ben Rosenfield in a recent photo

As you’d expect of the chief money person in a city with a larded-up $14.6 billion budget, Rosenfield is pretty good with numbers. But to cite his fiscal expertise as the source of Rosenfield’s unique position of near-universal trust and respect from all public and private corners of the city would be a bit like saying Daniel Day-Lewis is a good actor because he remembers all his lines. 

Rosenfield, who was tapped for this job in 2008 as a 33-year-old wunderkind, is lauded for his affability, non-partisanship, selflessness, ingenuity, and uncanny knowledge of the Lilliputian ropes holding together our budget. Rosenfield honed a particular skill to, by some alchemy, rummage through the municipal sofa to find a few coins to run imperiled programs — and, finally, he possessed the gentle but firm ability to inform an elected official or department head that they were overspending their budget and must rein things in. 

“He just knows more about the city budget than anyone else,” said Sean Elsbernd, the mayor’s chief of staff and a former supervisor. Elsbernd started in government a year after Rosenfield, and noted that the latter was perhaps the final holdout in City Hall to obtain a cell phone. Rosenfield, after all, was able to do a lot of stuff in his head. 

“There is no one who knows every drawer, every nook and cranny like Ben does,” Elsbernd continued. “He knows every single account, he knows the revenue, he knows what revenue goes into what account. He is a computer. You ask him what happened in 2017 to this fund, and he can tell you.” 

Board President Aaron Peskin also likened Rosenfield to a computer: “A really nice computer.” Rosenfield “knew what his duties and responsibilities were. He would, calmly and respectfully, not challenge your ideas, but make them better.” 

“He knew what people wanted, but was creative enough to put other ideas on the table. Everybody who gets involved in government starts out by wanting to do the best for their city, state, country. Ben was able to refocus people in the heat of battle, as people were mistreating each other and pursuing political agendas. He could always bring us back to what’s best for San Francisco. And he could do that because he was selfless. Let the egotistical politicians feel like they’re still getting credit; he never cared about credit. He wasn’t in it for self-aggrandizement, and that was his magic.” 

“The business of human life and politics is getting people on board with your ideas,” continued Peskin. Rosenfield’s ability to consistently galvanize City Hall politicos and move the city’s best interests forward indicated that he was “the best and most subtle politician in City Hall, bottom-line.” 

The front of San Francisco City Hall
San Francisco City Hall. Photo by Eleni Balakrishnan.

Rosenfield stressed that dread or frustration over next year’s looming budget debacle — which will, cherry on top, come during a mayoral re-election campaign and the contract negotiations for more than a score of public-sector unions — did not fuel his decision. 

But that doesn’t mean he was thrilled with this year’s budget process, during which difficult decisions were punted to 2024 and the city remained solvent, in large part, because of fiscal legerdemain and dipping into the prodigious reserves Rosenfield, in years past, pushed to establish. He expressed as much to his City Hall colleagues and also put it in black and white for all to read in his revenue letter regarding this year’s budget.   

“In that letter, we noted that the budget very heavily relied on one-time sources, drew on reserves, and on remaining federal relief,” Rosenfield said. “We offered that critique to the mayor’s proposed budget, and the mayor and board did not change anything in the proposed budget. There are larger gaps left than we hoped.” 

There are, he said frankly, “hard times ahead for the city, and hard choices for the mayor and board in coming years.” 

And those times will be harder without a consummate professional, budget maestro and human cooling rod like Rosenfield in the mix. Both Elsbernd and Peskin, independently, referred to him as “the adult in the room.” Rosenfield’s calmness and maturity will be sorely missed in 2024. 

“Not many people in this building have the kind of universal credibility, charm and nerdy know-how,” said Rudy Gonzalez, the secretary-treasurer of the city’s Building & Construction Trades Council. “Having been part of a few rounds of ballot and budget negotiations, I can say I will miss his technical expertise and, above all else, his commitment to the city of San Francisco — no matter the audience, be they a business, a mayor or a union worker.” 

“I have many reasons to lose sleep these nights,” Gonzalez continued. “This just added another.” 

“I have many reasons to lose sleep these nights. This just added another.” 

Rudy Gonzalez, secretary-treasurer of the city’s Building & Construction Trades Council.

The fiscal reserves San Francisco is steadily burning through are there, in part, because Rosenfield pushed to sock this money away. By the end of the present budget’s term, the city will have liquidated some 43 percent of its pre-pandemic reserves. And, in spite of Rosenfield’s warnings, we have not used the time that money has bought to make structural changes to match San Francisco’s new fiscal reality.

“When times are bad, there is a rush for money. When times are good, there is a rush for money,” said former controller Ed Harrington, a close Rosenfield ally. “There’s always a rush. There is always a desire to spend more than there is to spend.” A controller’s most basic function, Harrington says, “is just making sure that people are doing things as responsibly as possible.” 

That’s a hard job, and one that doesn’t end when the sun goes down. And, come February, it’ll be someone else’s job. 

Rosenfield, the father of 13- and 16-year-old girls, emphasizes that he “isn’t going anywhere.” He wants to “downshift” for a little while, and then move into something “in public service, and for the public good. That’s as far as I’ve gotten.” 

After 27 years in City Hall, he’s excited to leave the building. San Francisco will always have its problems. But Ben Rosenfield can’t always be the caretaker. 

See also:

Follow Us

Managing Editor/Columnist. Joe was born in San Francisco, raised in the Bay Area, and attended U.C. Berkeley. He never left.

“Your humble narrator” was a writer and columnist for SF Weekly from 2007 to 2015, and a senior editor at San Francisco Magazine from 2015 to 2017. You may also have read his work in the Guardian (U.S. and U.K.); San Francisco Public Press; San Francisco Chronicle; San Francisco Examiner; Dallas Morning News; and elsewhere.

He resides in the Excelsior with his wife and three (!) kids, 4.3 miles from his birthplace and 5,474 from hers.

The Northern California branch of the Society of Professional Journalists named Eskenazi the 2019 Journalist of the Year.

Join the Conversation


  1. Thank you for writing this up. I agree he’s been a sadly permanent fixture. To be sure, this guy oversaw the fraudulent Recology rate increase, then put himself in charge of calculating the refund – and he STILL didn’t calculate it correctly. He was also pals with Harlan Kelly & Mohammed Nuru.

    I wish the sf press wouldn’t immediately dust off Aaron Peskin & Ed Harrington every time they need a quote. I’d love to hear what the SF Marin Foodbank thinks of SF’s financial management since they’re getting cut – Ben and the City always found the $ for Urban Alchemy, the Linkage Center, Dwayne and so many other “worthy causes” – but those in need still end up fending for themselves.

    votes. Sign in to vote
    1. Your comment is totally misinformed and shows you don’t have a basic understanding of the role of the Controller and how the City works. The controller does not make programmatic decisions, that is the Mayor’s Office. Anne he didn’t “put himself in charge of calculating the refund”, the voters did, through a ballot measure. Get a clue.

      votes. Sign in to vote
      1. I worked for a general fund department for a long time (now retired) and that actually is how the city works. The controller “oversees” departments and advises on “programmatic decisions” so Jelly is quite wrong. They audit the mayor’s departments all the time, and they have the reports on their webpage to prove they have oversight duties. the controller staff also are responsible for the city financial statements, which are supposed to be right. So, they’re not the babe in the woods Jelly wants us to think (wonder why?) Rosenfield oversaw the garbage rates – that’s a fact. I notice Jelly did not include a link to where the voters said “Sure, you authorized the fraudulent increase, so you’re definitely the right one to do a refund.” Rosenfield also oversaw the transition to peoplesoft (and oracle based accounting system that never worked, it only led to bad press, unpaid bills and delayed financial statements). There is no thought put into the city’s finances, everyone just gets told to sign off so the controller can “net to zero.” We were told that things just have to look good at year end and not to ask questions about how much anything costs… Rosenfield also put out a bunch of “integrity reports” after the Nuru scandal , and they didn’t tell us anything we didn’t already know. The voters didn’t ask the city to investigate themselves. the outcry was for a real investigation….

        Thank you,


        votes. Sign in to vote
      2. I think the point was obviously that he’s an enabler – which you’ve apparently confirmed. Getting defensive doesn’t really help further whatever argument you’re making, sir.

        votes. Sign in to vote
  2. This was the adult in the room, along with Herrera, who signed off on all of Mohammed Nuru’s corruption. I guess getting out without being indicted is a W.

    votes. Sign in to vote
  3. I once was at the counter to pay a bill, and it just so happens that Harrington was filling in for a minute. I put the pen I borrowed in my pocket, but Harrington wanted it back.

    votes. Sign in to vote
  4. I remember overhearing Harrington in the Board of Supervisors’ hearing room in the early 2000s, before the nonprofits completely hijacked the operation, expressing his disgust with the progressive political project.

    votes. Sign in to vote
  5. So young,

    I’d vote for him for Congress.

    Best City numbers crunchers I’d say:

    Harvey Rose
    Ben Rosenfield
    Connie Chan
    Ted Eagan
    Rich Hillis

    Honest numbers are hard to come by here.

    As Joe O’Donoghue used to say:

    “Figures don’t lie but liars can figure.”

    Go Niners !!


    votes. Sign in to vote
  6. This write up makes him sound like the perfect candidate for Mayor. It would be refreshing to have an adult at the helm: especially one who puts the best interests of San Francisco ahead of their own, and is also capable of actually working and compromising with others.

    votes. Sign in to vote
Leave a comment
Please keep your comments short and civil. Do not leave multiple comments under multiple names on one article. We will zap comments that fail to adhere to these short and very easy-to-follow rules.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *