Outside of Central Station, Officers Brendan Mannix (left) and Jen Viceral (right) hand out the sweets to kids in the area. Photo by Susie Neilson

A $225,000 settlement with gay SFPD officer Brendan Mannix was approved by the Board of Supervisors today, more than three years after he filed a lawsuit alleging that he was harassed and discriminated against because of his sexual orientation. 

Further, Mannix’s lawsuit said he was retaliated against, and he accused the city of failing to prevent such harassment against members of the LGBT community. 

City Attorney spokeswoman Jen Kwart said Tuesday that, “given the inherent costs of continued litigation, we believe the proposed settlement is an appropriate resolution. There is no admission of liability on the part of SFPD or the city.” 

Mannix, who is still employed with the department, said in his 2018 civil lawsuit against the city that Sergeants Patrick Tobin and Lawrence McDevitt “frequently made comments about Mr. Mannix’s sexual orientation and what they perceived to be his failure to conform to what a man should look and act like.” 

Attorneys representing Mannix did not provide a comment on the outcome of the lawsuit before press time. This story will be updated if they do. 

Mannix joined the police force in 2015 and spent a successful year at Richmond Station. He alleges in his lawsuit that the harassment began when he was transferred to Central Station, where his appearance was often mocked and he was told he was too “dramatic” or being a “queen.” 

When he tried to make the behavior stop, Mannix said he was laughed at by Tobin and McDevitt. Mannix also said he heard derogatory comments made about transgender people, and learned of a Muslim officer also facing Islamophobia within the department, but claimed he was disregarded when he tried to come forward about it. 

Tobin left the SFPD in 2017 and joined the Broadmoor Police Department, which has been under recent scrutiny for various instances of corruption. Tobin and McDevitt both also have histories of misconduct during their long careers with the SFPD. 

Eventually, Mannix said his calls for backup started going unheeded, including in one case where he pursued and apprehended a robbery suspect alone. Backup from his station never arrived to assist. 

At one point, court documents say, Mannix took a leave of absence during the summer of 2017, during which time Sgt. Tobin retired from the SFPD. 

When he returned from his leave, the discrimination continued. Mannix decided to file a formal complaint in late 2017 with the city’s Department of Human Resources, Equal Employment Opportunity Division. But Mannix said the sergeant in charge of the complaint omitted most details of the allegations, and the EEO Division made no findings in his favor. 

Mannix ultimately filed a complaint with the California Department of Fair Employment and Housing, which gave him the green light to sue the city in 2018. The city, in response, denied all of Mannix’s allegations and any claims of injury he made in his lawsuit. 

The SFPD did not respond to a request for comment on whether Tobin, McDevitt, or any other officers named in the lawsuit ever faced any discipline in response to Mannix’s accusations. This story will be updated if we receive a response. 

Mannix’s settlement was reached in November, 2021. After today’s vote, it now awaits final approval by the Board of Supervisors. 


Your contribution is appreciated.

Follow Us

REPORTER. Eleni reports on policing in San Francisco. She first moved to the city on a whim more than 10 years ago, and the Mission has become her home. Follow her on Twitter @miss_elenius.

Join the Conversation


  1. Campers,

    There is a very very very simple answer to all SFPD problems.

    Let the people elect our top cop!!!!

    An independent chief who could care less what the POA or Mayor says can make real reforms and hold the bigots accountable.

    Try and imagine a half dozen or more candidates running on various platforms crafted to appeal to the voters …

    Guaranteed Foot Patrols permanently?

    Need em cause SFPD has that group of actual neighborhood cops down to one member.

    I’m talking about Patrol Specials and I don’t see any single member of the Board of Supervisors trying to save them.

    They’re older than the SFPD and were formed in 1850 cause the cops wouldn’t do their jobs.

    Kinda like now.

    Hell, someone around here wrote a column not that long ago describing how the cops let a guy who assaultcause the cops are trying to make the DA look bad.

    We need to find some supe with the guts to put electing our Police Chief on the ballot.

    I asked Supervisor Walton about it and he said he’d be afraid that the new Chief might go crooked.

    Let’s see Mission Local pick up the crusade.

    Not my idea by the way.

    Nope, came from Michael Hennessey.

    He was our elected Sheriff for 32 years and said it might take a couple of election cycles to get a candidate who actually worked to fulfill their platform but once you got one they might last a long time cause the voters will like the change.

    Go Giants!

    h. ed a Muni driver just walk away

    votes. Sign in to vote
    1. We could get real incompetence too. I like the fact that the mayor hires the chief that she feels will do the best job for the city. The criteria are usually based on experience and competence. With the voters choosing, you could get just about anything.

      votes. Sign in to vote
Leave a comment
Please keep your comments short and civil. Do not leave multiple comments under multiple names on one article. We will zap comments that fail to adhere to these short and very easy-to-follow rules.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *