line outside DBI
In this March 16, 2020 photo, a line of permit-seekers stretched out the door of the Department of Building Inspection and down Mission Street at the exact moment the mayor and health director were announcing the initial shelter-in-place order.

When San Francisco on March 16 issued its sweeping COVID-19 shelter-in-place order, employees at the embattled Department of Building Inspection were soon sent home to do just that. 

But after being instructed that they were to be furloughed until April 7, they were  subsequently called back, en masse, and reported to work on March 23, as “essential” workers. 

Now the city, the department, its several hundred employees, and their unions are working, on the fly, to determine just who is “essential” and who really needs to show up in the office every day — meaning many workers could be soon sent back home again. 

Workers here feel like this is a questionable policy – one they say is unique in the Bay Area to San Francisco – that has been enacted poorly. 

“You know, I think this is a pretty bad idea,” said one longtime inspector. “There’s a shortage of personal protective equipment, even for healthcare workers. We don’t even have any. And they’re asking us to go into buildings.” 

“When I read the instructions, I thought [essential work] would be shelters or hospitals — not condos. It seems the mayor has interpreted it so all housing construction is ‘essential.’” 

That’s so, and building and construction interests have not sat this one out. On March 19, the Associated General Contractors of California wrote to Gov. Gavin Newsom requesting that “essential infrastructure” would include “all active construction job sites.” 

The city’s order is more proscriptive, applying only to housing construction. But if you have private construction, you need inspectors. There is, however, less construction, which prompts the question of just how many “essential” workers are needed. The Department of Building Inspection on Thursday reported 253 inspections in the previous five days — with 500 to 700 being a more normal number. 

What’s more, DBI reports that, increasingly, when its inspectors show up for an appointment, neither the owner nor the contractor bothers to make an appearance. 

The city, DBI and its workers’ unions are seeking ways for more employees to work from home. Plan-checkers, for instance, can review documents on computers remotely. Some work can be done via video, even some inspections. Other workers have been assigned to new city jobs altogether; at least eight Cantonese-speaking DBI employees are now doing translation at the city’s new Emergency Operation Center. 

But much DBI work must still be done in person. And much is needed: Housing inspectors, for instance, have been tasked with ensuring that Single-Room Occupancy hotel bathrooms are clean and provide soap for their COVID-19-vulnerable residents. 

“There is work to be done,” notes a veteran employee. Still, he thought the department could get by at this time with half its employees. A veteran inspector concurred: “We could work with a skeleton crew of folks, and not have people just coming in when they didn’t need to. I want to emphasize that, what DBI needs is a much smaller amount of people working doing the vital work of keeping people safe, while maintaining the safety and well-being of the inspectors and other staff. This isn’t being met. It makes little sense.” 

San Francisco Department of Building Inspection employees noted that other cities’ building departments did not dismiss then call back all their workers, deeming nearly every one of them “essential.” 

San Jose, for instance, has established extreme limits on inspections. A call to San Jose on Friday was answered by an automated recording stating the department was shuttered until April 7 and “only providing essential public services necessary to protect the health, safety, and welfare of the community.” 

The general public is still barred from DBI offices at 166o Mission. Workers here, however noted that the line to obtain permits stretched out the door and down Mission Street even during the March 16 speech by Mayor London Breed and Health Director Dr. Grant Colfax announcing the shelter-in-place order.

The directive calling San Francisco DBI employees back to work was penned by interim director Patrick O’Riordan — but multiple employees, even those sympathetic to O’Riordan, said they felt this was a City Hall decision.

O’Riordan — who is showing up to work and picking up his own phone — declined to answer questions. Sources within City Hall simply said “construction is an essential business and, presumably, Patrick read the health order.”

The decision, per others close to it, was crafted by O’Riordan, the City Attorney’s office, the Department of Human Resources, and the Office of the City Administrator.  

Union and DBI sources hoped that it could be determined by next week or so just who is truly “essential” and who can work from home. Long overdue shifts from paper-based systems to digital may now be expedited.

In the meantime, employees are confused why they were pulled back into work before these plans were finalized, only to possibly be sent home again. 

“It’s not that we don’t want to work. We want to stay safe and healthy,” said a DBI employee who is currently taking the bus to the office every day. 

“I don’t understand why they couldn’t have left everyone on furlough until they came up with a strategy.” 

If you are a regular reader — or simply want to support local news — Mission Local could use your help now. Thank you and be well. 

Follow Us

Joe is a columnist and the managing editor of Mission Local. He was born in San Francisco, raised in the Bay Area, and attended U.C. Berkeley. He never left.

“Your humble narrator” was a writer and columnist for SF Weekly from 2007 to 2015, and a senior editor at San Francisco Magazine from 2015 to 2017. You may also have read his work in the Guardian (U.S. and U.K.); San Francisco Public Press; San Francisco Chronicle; San Francisco Examiner; Dallas Morning News; and elsewhere.

He resides in the Excelsior with his wife and three (!) kids, 4.3 miles from his birthplace and 5,474 from hers.

The Northern California branch of the Society of Professional Journalists named Eskenazi the 2019 Journalist of the Year.

Join the Conversation

7 Comments

  1. This is good grounds for a class action lawsuit!!

    1. DbI Management has not provided the required PPE while they have acknowledged the health risks.
    2. They have forbid inspectors from returning from the field to the office due to the possibility of infection.

    DBI management has isolated themselves in a protected environment. Contractors and inspectors
    are not be allowed at 1660 Mission .

    Get your negative test result now to establish a baseline.

    Once you have been infected in the field sue.

    0
    0
    votes. Sign in to vote
  2. SFDBI needs to shut it down completly and set the standard and not wait for some other city. Also this just encourages more workers to return back and forth to the city and potentially expose their families.

    0
    0
    votes. Sign in to vote
  3. DBI has no business being in business. And I’m not saying this for the reasons you might think. DBI has decided that sending its field inspectors into the field, with NO PPE’s having been issued, is appropriate and acceptable behavior by a city department. The same city that has directed every citizen to follow appropriate CDC and SFDPH guidelines to minimize risk and exposure to covid 19. But DBI workers are special and not for the reasons you may believe. DBI workers don’t get sick, surely aren’t contagious and would never possibly endanger themselves, their families or others around them by not having cleaning supplies or PPE’s before they go from job site to job site. That would be silly talk.
    No DBI has determined since they have no way to provide even a modicum of protection for the field Inspectors, they’ve told the inspectors to go sites directly and basically told good luck finding PPE’s for your job.
    Question: Would it be safe to send an inspector into job without hard hat and vest and be told “while your working be careful for falling objects hitting your head or run getting over by a forklift !” That’s what PPE’s are for to do a job with some protection.

    Someone needs to tell DBI that endangering it’s staff and the Public is not an essential city service.
    Do it right or don’t do it at all!

    0
    0
    votes. Sign in to vote
  4. The same story is unfolding at rec and park. The litmus test there seems to be: can this job be done via telecommute? Great, do it. But if it can’t be done via telecommute (e.g. golf courses, lawn mowing, gardening, stationary engineers), label it “essential.”

    The only difference between rec and park and DBI: at RPD, fewer have been sent home and sent back. Most are just still working like it’s a regular, pre 3/17 day. The truly ESSENTIAL jobs could be done on call, or at least with a greatly reduced staff or hours.

    I’m sure one factor is good old fashioned city power plays: if you don’t call your employees “essential,” how can you claim to be powerful?

    I’m sure it’s being tracked somewhere as a valuable indicator, but would certainly be interesting to see how many new cases are non-healthcare essential staff.

    0
    0
    votes. Sign in to vote
  5. Thank YOU, Joe, for continued research & reporting in these hard times.
    Prioritizing construction as “essential”,
    without protective gear for the inspectors?
    Sounds like a local gov’t. version of Trump.

    0
    0
    votes. Sign in to vote
  6. I think only 10-20% are needed and essential. The other 80% should be furloughed without pay. They should keep their health benefits. We could use their salaries and. Iolt more affordable housing. Win win for everyone

    0
    0
    votes. Sign in to vote
Leave a comment
Please keep your comments short and civil. Do not leave multiple comments under multiple names on one article. We will zap comments that fail to adhere to these short and easy-to-follow rules.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *