When asked the purpose of his email to Supervisor Sandra Lee Fewer's retired cop husband John, ex-POA boss Gary Delagnes told Mission Local "You can tell Sandra the next time she opens her mouth, I’m going to release John’s record to the Board of Supervisors." Photo illustration by Abraham Rodriguez

Threatening letter from former POA boss predated Supervisor Sandra Lee Fewer’s ‘Fuck the POA’ chant

‘You can tell Sandra the next time she opens her mouth, I’m going to release John’s record to the Board of Supervisors,’ Gary Delagnes tells Mission Local 

[dropcap] I[/dropcap]

n a bellicose email obtained by Mission Local, former police union boss Gary Delagnes bemoaned Supervisor Sandra Lee Fewer’s voting record, and threatens to humiliate her by releasing the confidential disciplinary files of her husband, retired San Francisco Police Sergeant John Fewer. 

“ … Here is the deal. We know that Supervisor Fewer is a fighter for the oppressed, opposed to this horrible capitalistic society, and abhors any form of police brutality so I will be releasing John’s disciplinary record (which is quite substantial and entertaining),” reads the letter. 

“Perhaps he [John Fewer] should sit down and think about all of the complaints he received, and maybe recall some of his alleged actions, as I did last night, and let’s see how that will play in front of his wife’s colleagues at the Board. His disciplinary record is quite entertaining, I assure you. They are free to call my bluff if they wish.” 

Delagnes wrote this email in the summer of 2018 to retired SFPD Commander Rich Corriea, tasking him to send it along to John Fewer. “He could’ve just asked me for John’s email address,” said Corriea. He described Delagnes’ threats as “troubling, even evil.”

Delagnes also cc’d Police Officers Association legal defense administrator and former captain Paul Chignell, retired chief Tony Ribera, and John Tennant — the POA’s former attorney. 

While this email was sent on June 28 of 2018, Mission Local only obtained it this month. Corriea, Ribera and Delagnes himself confirmed its contents. 

At the time of its writing, Delagnes, the president of the union from 2004 to 2013, was employed as a POA consultant. In February 2019 he was ousted from this post following a Facebook tirade against the deceased former Public Defender Jeff Adachi. 

Neither John nor Sandra Fewer called Delagnes’ bluff. Instead, they called the City Attorney’s office, which directed them to the DA’s office, then led by George Gascón. The status of the case is uncertain, but it appears to be dormant. Calls to the DA’s office — now helmed by Suzy Loftus, with Chesa Boudin to be sworn in on Jan. 8 — were not returned. 

“I saw it as a threat to harm my family,” says Sandra Lee Fewer. “I should think twice. I should always keep this in the back of my mind whenever I’m voting on or deliberating an issue of concern to the police.” 

The personnel records Delagnes threatened to disseminate, Sandra Lee Fewer continued, “are protected under the law. But the way they worded this is, they are above the law. And they can do this.” 

Multiple messages left for POA president Tony Montoya were not returned; it is unclear if he knew of Delagnes’ email.* 

Delagnes, however, freely acknowledged he sent it. “She was ripping the POA; I don’t remember what she was ripping them about back in those days. I got angry at the time, as I used to do — not anymore, I’m retired,” he said. 

When asked what the purpose of this email was, he replied, “You can tell Sandra the next time she opens her mouth, I’m going to release John’s record to the Board of Supervisors.” 

But, he continued, “I can’t do that. I ran it by a lawyer. I ran it by [POA counsel] Gregg Adam. It’s a violation of state law. Definitely a misdemeanor. Could be a felony!” 

Supervisor Sandra Lee Fewer, pictured here in her role as Budget Committee chair. Photo by Lola M. Chavez.

In fact, it could be extortion or blackmail. 

Both Sandra and John Fewer took it that way: “I saw it as what he was saying is ‘if you don’t get on board with us, we’ll harm your family,’” said Sandra Lee Fewer. Adds John: “The intention was to embarrass Sandy, or harm her. Or, if she was a weak person, to get her to go along with them a little more, see things their way.” 

Mission Local shared the contents of the email with several law professors. While it’s clear in the letter that Delagnes is threatening to release negative information to harm his enemies, this alone does not constitute extortion or blackmail. To reach that threshold, he would’ve had to ask for something in return to prevent the release of damaging information — and Delagnes’ letter is ambiguous about this. 

“Saying ‘you better worry tonight, because tomorrow you’ll read this in the paper’ — that’s not extortion,” explains John Diamond, a professor at UC Hastings. 

“The ironic thing about extortion is: You can threaten to disclose something. And you can ask for things. But you can’t put the two together.” 

Delagnes, in his letter, does not make a clear ask. There is, in the end, no law against taking political vengeance. 

“Not that I think nothing wrong happened here,” says Scott Altman, a professor at the USC Gould School of Law, “but proving beyond a reasonable doubt that [Delagnes] was seeking to obtain property or an official act seems like it’d be really hard to do based on that vague language.”

And yet the language Delagnes subsequently used in conversation with Mission Local was far less vague than his one-page letter, in which there was no direct causality between demands made of Supervisor Sandra Lee Fewer and the threatened release of John Fewer’s confidential records. What Delagnes told us in December 2019 is remarkably direct and causal: You can tell Sandra the next time she opens her mouth, I’m going to release John’s record to the Board of Supervisors.

Delagnes’ letter “is very far from explicit,” says Altman. “It’s unclear what he wanted.” Based on Delagnes’ conversation with Mission Local, however, it is clearer. And it’s also clear, based on his own words, that he put thought and effort into following through with his threat. 

Delagnes says he reconsidered, however. Not only is it illegal to release these confidential records — nor should he even be rummaging through them — but it would be deeply hypocritical for Delagnes to disseminate protected police files. 

He acknowledges this: “As president of the POA, I’ve fought the release of police records for a long time. To a certain degree, I had to say ‘I’m doing the same thing I’m fighting,’” Delagnes says. “As much as I do dislike Rich, Sandy, and John, I have a loyalty to cops. I would’ve set a terrible precedent releasing his disciplinary record.”  

And yet, if those files just happened to land on Delagnes’ desk, it’s not illegal for him to distribute them — just as it wouldn’t be illegal for a journalist to publish them. Anyone unfamiliar with these rules learned them following Adachi’s sudden death in February, when confidential police files regarding the Public Defender’s last hours were quickly leaked by the SFPD and disseminated via the media. 

The expediency of these leaks — and the ongoing lack of accountability — can hardly have been lost on the Fewers. 

Election night, 2019: “I got just one thing to say: Fuck the POA,” says Supervisor Sandra Lee Fewer. For good measure, she adds, “This is what happens when we throw the fuck down.” Photo by Julian Mark.

Delagnes, 65, ascended to the POA’s vice presidency in 1990. Under his leadership, the San Francisco Police Department became one of the nation’s best-compensated police forces, going from the state’s 92nd-best-paid department in 1992 to become one of the richest big-city outfits in all of California. 

At the same time, he served as the vocal and very visible face of a union increasingly viewed as a reactionary force — and, to a greater and greater extent, isolated from power and on the political outs. In 2015, he was fined $5,500 for illegal lobbying due to an email he sent then-Supervisor Malia Cohen regarding a proposed non-binding resolution cheering Black Lives Matter efforts: “If you become involved in this legislation you can rest assured that any relation with the POA is over,” reads his note to Cohen. “We went above and beyond for you and this is how you repay us. You had better think long and hard before lending your name to this. I am astounded that you would involve yourself in this absolute bullshit.”

The POA alienated Supervisor — and later, mayor — London Breed; it has, in recent years, grown more and more politically ineffective. Its attempts to bypass the Police Commission and write its own rules regarding Tasers, Proposition H of 2018, was obliterated by a 60-40 margin, despite the police union outspending its foes by a factor of five. In 2019, some $700,000 marshaled by the POA was put into ads labeling DA candidate Chesa Boudin “The No. 1 choice of criminals and gang members.” Boudin won his race, and the POA’s negative ads were credited with galvanizing his supporters.  

Delagnes, in his conversation with Mission Local, was clearly incensed to have seen John Fewer holding a sign for “Chelsea Boudin” (Whether intentionally or not, Delagnes repeatedly referred to the DA-elect as “Chelsea”). 

It was at Boudin’s election night gathering that Sandra Lee Fewer led a chant of “Fuck the POA.” While many assumed, correctly, this was in reaction to the union’s ham-handed role in the DA’s race, Fewer acknowledged her own situation did loom large. 

“I said ‘Fuck the POA,’ I get it. It’s offensive to a lot of people,” Fewer says. “I also think a lot of people don’t understand the relationship between the POA and elected officials — in particular, those they threaten. I meet many unions. I meet many associations. This is the only one that has ever threatened me or mentioned doing harm to my family.” 

Fewer said the June 2018 letter has not altered her on-the-job performance, via either fear or retribution. 

“Tony Ribera came to ask me for an additional $50,000 for batting cages at Washington High,” she said. “He did this knowing he was cc’d on that email, and he never reached out to me and distanced himself from it. I granted it.” 

Delagnes, for his part, did not seem concerned that he broke any laws or would face any consequences. “I don’t think anybody goes to jail in San Francisco,” he said. 

“You think Chelsea is going to prosecute me?”  

Update, Dec. 31: At shortly after 9 a.m., current Police Officers Association president Tony Montoya sent Mission Local the following statement:

The SFPOA will never sanction, authorize, or participate in the unauthorized and illegal dissemination of any police officer’s personal information and/or personnel records, including discipline case files that may be in the possession of our legal defense fund. Never.

This POA holds all personal and personnel related materials provided to us with the utmost security and privacy.

The recent news report detailing the threats made by former SFPOA President Gary Delagnes to release retired SFPD Sergeant John Fewer’s personnel records as a bargaining chip to be used for some perceived political advantage is appalling and also a violation of our member’s trust.

Make no mistake, we have considerable disagreements with Supervisor Fewer and believe she is unfit for public office. We have forcefully condemned her unhinged election-night rant disparaging SFPOA members and we believe many of her policy actions have contributed to more crime for residents to suffer through and less accountability for criminals in San Francisco. Voters will soon decide her fate.

But to threaten to expose a former police officer’s personnel records is dangerous, wrong, and hypocritical.  The current SFPOA leadership had no knowledge of the threats levied by Mr. Delagnes and we fully denounce his actions.  It’s appalling that a former union president would contemplate sacrificing the personal privacy of one our members in order to satisfy a grossly misguided personal vendetta.

We believe strongly that police officer personnel files should only be released in accordance and compliance with the law. As such, we instructed our legal counsel to send Mr. Delagnes a demand letter instructing him to return to the SFPOA any personnel files, records, and/or attorney-client information that he may have acquired as a result of his previous work for the SFPOA.

Mr. Delagnes no longer serves in any official capacity in our union.

Tony Montoya, President, SFPOA

Follow Us

Managing Editor/Columnist. Joe was born in San Francisco, raised in the Bay Area, and attended U.C. Berkeley. He never left.

“Your humble narrator” was a writer and columnist for SF Weekly from 2007 to 2015, and a senior editor at San Francisco Magazine from 2015 to 2017. You may also have read his work in the Guardian (U.S. and U.K.); San Francisco Public Press; San Francisco Chronicle; San Francisco Examiner; Dallas Morning News; and elsewhere.

He resides in the Excelsior with his wife and three (!) kids, 4.3 miles from his birthplace and 5,474 from hers.

The Northern California branch of the Society of Professional Journalists named Eskenazi the 2019 Journalist of the Year.

Join the Conversation


Please keep your comments short and civil. We will zap comments that fail to adhere to these short and very easy-to-follow rules.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. There’s an old adage in politics, put nothing in writing and throw nothing away some fool has put in writing.

  2. Good job Gary. Every now & then you have to remind those who think there running the show that we only allow them to think so.

  3. Support for unions in the private sector and select public sector employees is one thing.

    Why the Police have a union or POA is beyond me.

    They should not have a political voice at all.

    This works well in our military. You don’t hear about an Army union. We have laws against them politicking.

    They should be appointed, serve, and STFU on political matters.

  4. Fewer is not opposed to this horrible capitalistic society. She’s perfectly happy to buy and sell Mission district apartment buildings for profit — and not do anything to protect her tenants.

    1. So true.

      Delagnes may be a jerk, but Fewer is a phenomenal hypocrite.

      When she sold her Mission duplex income property, she didn’t even bother to follow the spirit of her recent legislation requiring apartment building sellers to offer right of first refusal to housing non-profits to purchase the property in order to keep tenants in place.

      Fewer unloaded the building for top dollar — making over a $1M in purely speculative profit — and you can bet your bottom dollar that the current tenants are going to be Ellis Act evicted by the new owner.


      1. Believe her legis was limited to 3-6 unit bldgs.

        Aside from the obvious personal interest, there’s the fact that duplexes have an auto path to condo-conversion.

  5. Completely disagree that “obliviously, something there to hide for me.”

    I’d speculate to “good trouble”, and refer to a whole lot of love for John Lewis.

  6. It doesn’t seem this would’ve seen the light of day without Fewer’s Howard Dean moment. If Fewer approached the DA, then obviously she’s had access to that letter. The timing is suspect.

    I could care less Fewer led that chant, but her subsequent apology just reinforced my belief that she doesn’t quite know where she stands. She lost me for good when she backed Vallie Brown, who I feel the same way about.

    Delagnes always came off like a grade school bully, so there’s no surprise there. I bet he’s a big Eddie Gallagher fan.

  7. One way to take the venom out of a threat is to throw open the books. After “Lug Nuts” threatened to publish those records, she should have gone ahead – held a press conference – and told everyone what LugNuts/POA was attempting to do, and them publicized those records themselves.

    Embarrassing? Probably. Truth-to-power? Hellya. Pull the fangs off that viper and confront the culture of the reticent POA/SFPD to change it. Otherwise … one comes away with a somewhat better understanding of her election nite statement, but it leaves one wondering if a more subtle exertion might not just succeed against her at a latter point. Obviously, there’s something there to still hide.

  8. Joe,

    Gary is a great opponent.

    As the poet said, if he didn’t exist I’d have to invent him.

    He’s all bluster til under oath.

    He called Gascon a racist and repeated things accordingly until
    he got under oath and then he back tracked on all.

    I’ve always called him … ‘Da Lug Nuts’ cause he’s crude but effective.

    Goes all the way back to Hongisto.

    Niners acting like 2010 Giants