[dropcap]”T[/dropcap]hanks for everyone’s hard work. I am happy to feel that momentum is building. After the Cow Demons and Snake Spirits at Harvey Milk Dem Club’s smear and attack, I am even more well-known. Today I received the endorsement of the United Democratic Club. This club is the biggest and developing the fastest in San Francisco, 5-6 times of the size of the Cow Demons and Snake Spirits Club. Thanks for everyone’s hard work. I have confidence; let’s work hard together and sprint forward.

Publicly, school board candidate Josephine Zhao has been contrite. Publicly, she has apologized, repeatedly, after recent mainstream, English-language news reports of how “transphobic remarks she made to Chinese newspapers” five years ago are now causing consternation among LGBTQ groups such as the Milk Club.

Zhao now describes her past denunciation of California’s gender-neutral bathroom bill, AB 1266, as a mistake — the result of being misinformed. “I was a recent citizen then. I became a citizen in 2011; the incident took place in 2013,” she says. “Someone took me to a press conference. I only knew one person there. I apologize I got sucked into it.”

She now says she supports transgender children and gender-neutral bathrooms; her daughter’s best friend, she claims, recently came out as a transgender boy, and “we gave the family big support.”

Privately, however, she is penning ebullient messages to her supporters via the Chinese language app WeChat — like the August 29 communique at the top of this article — and, notably, employing Chinese Cultural Revolution terms to denounce her detractors.

In another recent message, she describes her opponents in the school board race as “two transgender candidates … fighting for the title of ‘first transgender commissioner’ … There are also three homosexuals. Their highest priority for education would be to spread ideologies.”

Zhao has raised far more money — some $78,000 as of latest reporting — than any of the other 19 school board candidates running for three openings. She has lost some political endorsements of late, but remains in the good graces of Mayor London Breed and Sen. Scott Wiener, both of whom she campaigned for fervently (Zhao recruited scads of paid staff onto Wiener’s 2016 race vs. Jane Kim; “$125/day, hold signs and you only need to know one phrase in English: “I like Scott Wiener!” she wrote to supporters).

Mission Local has obtained and had translated a number of Zhao’s WeChat messages to her backers. These are not subtle missives. In one, she refers to former Board of Education member and current Supervisor Sandra Lee Fewer as “Chinese trash” and a “race-traitor.” In another, Supervisor Jane Kim is described as a “homewrecker.” 

This WeChat from Josephine Zhao reads “Chinese Trash Sandy Lee Fewer really doesn’t deserve to be in politics, if she became Supervisor she is not only hurting our kids but also our families. Before passing these policies she didn’t listen to Chinese voices, after they passed she said we misunderstood. What a race-traitor. It is impossible to change these policies now. Hope everyone can pull parents of Richmond schools like George Washington, Presidio, Argonne into the group, so they can see the truth.”

Those are harsh words, but not atypical (Zhao, in 2014, referred to David Chiu as a “traitor” — in English, and publicly viewable on Facebook — over his support of affirmative-action legislation, which Zhao felt disadvantaged Asians. Chiu is endorsing her for school board; they have, apparently, patched things up).

Zhao has produced a voluminous — and incendiary — written record of her positions on any number of issues; she also talked about them extensively on a radio show she co-hosted. 

But it’s largely in Cantonese.

And, as such, most of it has been been dutifully ignored by non-Chinese-speaking San Francisco and its media establishment. (You can find archives at the public library of English-language newspapers going back to the Gold Rush era — but they toss out the Chinese-language papers every few weeks.)

It does not, however, require an archaeological expedition or the Rosetta Stone to glean what’s going on in the Chinese-language press, read social media posts penned by Zhao herself, or hear her opine on the radio.

So, with even minimal exploration, Zhao’s explanations of her troubling past behavior rapidly begin to strain credulity.

Zhao’s campaign materials and personal Facebook page state she emigrated from China some 30 years ago, when she was 19. She obtained an undergraduate degree from the University of Northern Colorado and a master’s from Colorado State. She is an exceedingly smart, highly educated, successful and well-spoken woman.

All of this makes her explanation regarding her 2013 jeremiad against the gender-neutral bathroom bill difficult to embrace.

The legislation was only one page long, and the holder of an advanced academic degree who had lived in the United States for the better part of three decades and enjoyed a successful career should have been able to read it — or, if that proved unsatisfactory, phone up its author, Tom Ammiano, and ask him to explain it.

In 2013, Zhao was already in her mid-40s. And, far from mere “remarks she made to Chinese newspapers,” or a singular “incident,” Zhao in September 2013 was a featured speaker at a press conference denouncing the bill. She was there alongside a number of speakers representing reactionary organizations, including the Pacific Justice Institute — which is described by the Southern Poverty Law Center as “an anti-LGBT hate group.”

At that event, Zhao was quoted in the Chinese-language press as claiming that the bill would protect the 2 percent of students who are transsexual, but would “offend and infringe on the rights and privacy of 98 percent of students,” leading to “violence” and even “rape.”

Weeks later, she repeated these claims on Chinese-language radio, urging listeners to sign a Pacific Justice Institute-organized petition to repeal the legislation. She instructed listeners to download the petition from the radio station’s website and mail it back to the station — indicating, far from being “sucked into it,” she was playing no small role in organizing and perpetuating this recall drive.

“On the surface, the legislation seems to be one thing,” she told listeners in October 2013, “but, in reality, it’s another.”

Zhao now says she was misinformed about the bill. Regardless, it’s clear she had no problem energetically misinforming her considerable group of followers about it — either intentionally or via ignorance bordering on negligence.

This legislation, she warned radio listeners, “seems to be fine” because it protects the 2 percent of students who are transgender: “They do not know whether they are a boy or a girl.”

But “this legislation has a huge loophole. It allows students to determine which gendered restroom they prefer to use” and “this identity does not need to be registered with their public record.” As such, “it opens the door for boys and girls to use the bathroom together and shower together and it becomes a hotbed for a culture of sexual assault and rape.”

Students, she said, should have to “register their identity” before using the restroom.

Zhao now says she was given bad information about all of this. She’s sorry, she says. She didn’t know what the bill was about — even though she spoke alongside a reactionary anti-LGBT hate group denouncing it and then meticulously explained to radio listeners what it was about — before exhorting them to sign the Pacific Justice Institute’s petition. “That was how I operated back then,” she says now. “I am sorry it went so far.”

But, during her radio broadcast in 2013, she took it further yet.

“This is evil legislation,” she told listeners. “We must use these signatures so we can repeal this evil legislation.”

“From our city government, up to our state government,” she continued, “our elected leaders are free to do whatever they want,” she said, employing a turn of phrase one might use to describe spoiled children. “They are relaxing their moral views. Therefore, they cannot represent our Chinese American ideals.”

It was not so long ago when she said this. In 2013, Ed Lee was the mayor of San Francisco. David Chiu was board president. Katy Tang, Eric Mar and Norman Yee were also serving on the board. These are the elected leaders who were “relaxing their moral views.” These are the elected leaders who “cannot represent our Chinese American ideals.”  

So, yes, that was a hell of a thing to say. 

Josephine Zhao’s WeChat message slammed Jane Kim during Kim’s state senate race vs. Scott Wiener:
“Not only is Jane Kim a home wrecker, that doesn’t matter as much, but she is ruining someone else’s career.
The first Asian American judge to have high rank in our judicial system, appointed by multiple governors, a graduate of Stanford, Oxford, and Yale. He once taught at Berkeley, his wife and Jane Kim were his students.
He is Goodwin Liu, 45 years old, and because of Jane’s involvement in his personal relationship, he ruined his career as his ex-wife is a heavyweight advisor to Hillary Clinton. Jane not only tried to strip
Mayor Lee’s power, but with such terrible morals, is this someone whom we can trust to be our state senate? Know when to stop, don’t be fooled!”

Personal transformations happen. If Josephine Zhao says that she now supports transgender rights and supported her daughter’s friend — or marched in the Pride parade and, she claims, joined the Alice B. Toklas LGBT Democratic Club — that’s great. More power to her. That’s what San Francisco is for. 

Abrupt personal transformations by a candidate for office with a lengthy track record are, however, worthy of skepticism.

Zhao’s recent op-ed in the Examiner is titled “An immigrant’s path for progressive leadership.” In it, she describes herself as “A progressive leader in the immigrant community.”

As recently as 2012, however, she was personally, and via her nonprofit AsianAmericanVoters.org, urging San Franciscans to vote a straight Republican ticket — Mitt Romney for president, John Dennis for Congress — and support the San Francisco Republican Party, whose materials her nonprofit proudly translated and publicized. 

Zhao, personally and via her nonprofits, has spent years denouncing rent control, championing the Ellis Act, and questioning whether city tenants have too much power. “Her whole family moved to San Francisco. She became a common small property owner. But she realized that rent-control policies in this city make landlords completely lose their property rights,” reads a 2017 profile of Zhao in the China Press.

She now says she supports Proposition 10, which would repeal the Costa Hawkins Act and allow local California jurisdictions to adopt rent-control policies.

As such, right-leaning members of the Chinese community have assailed her as two-faced. But, in an Aug. 23 World Journal article, Zhao makes a loaded statement: “She suggests to the Chinese community to see what she says later.

After she’s elected, that is. 

What Zhao is saying now, meanwhile, is that the attacks on her are tantamount to attacks on the Chinese community writ large — and her loss in November would portend nothing short of disenfranchisement for Chinese Americans, leading to out-and-out persecution:  

“If Josephine Zhao, a new citizen, can be persecuted and labeled as a hater for things she said, then all of you, all immigrants, all of the outsiders who haven’t been politically educated in San Francisco, will become a plague,” she wrote to her supporters via WeChat. “Let alone election campaigns, in the future because we are politically incorrect, we would not be able to work in schools or government. We are collectively being wronged, are you going to stand by and watch, or are you going to come out and fight? It’s time to stand together with Josephine and defend our community. Please vote for Josephine Zhao on November 6th, use your votes to fight for justice!”

Perhaps in this race for school board, San Francisco voters could do worse than remembering a Maya Angelou quote many of us learned in school: “When someone shows you who they are, believe them the first time.”  

Follow Us

Managing Editor/Columnist. Joe was born in San Francisco, raised in the Bay Area, and attended U.C. Berkeley. He never left.

“Your humble narrator” was a writer and columnist for SF Weekly from 2007 to 2015, and a senior editor at San Francisco Magazine from 2015 to 2017. You may also have read his work in the Guardian (U.S. and U.K.); San Francisco Public Press; San Francisco Chronicle; San Francisco Examiner; Dallas Morning News; and elsewhere.

He resides in the Excelsior with his wife and three (!) kids, 4.3 miles from his birthplace and 5,474 from hers.

The Northern California branch of the Society of Professional Journalists named Eskenazi the 2019 Journalist of the Year.

Join the Conversation


  1. The “sleeping tiger has been woke and will longer be satisfied to stay hidden in the tall grass”
    Thank you Alice Collins and her violent anti Asian following.

    votes. Sign in to vote
  2. She screwed herself big time. She seems like a very passionate young lady. Where can I meet her?

    votes. Sign in to vote
  3. Joe Eskenazi, I don’t know how many children you have. I don’t know how much you care about our kids education chance. As a parent, I really care about our kids can get the best education chance or not. Josephine Zhao is the right person to put our parents’ options into the board. She has kids in public school too. When she was fighting for our children, and won the chance for our children. What are you? Please don’t defame a person you don’t really know !

    votes. Sign in to vote
    1. I have three children, ma’am. Everything in the article is, rather literally, spelled out. All of the source materials are there. Maybe you should read it again.



      votes. Sign in to vote
      1. Wenhai, its pretty standard for reporters to report on political figures. the author isn’t defaming anyone, he is looking into statements to determine whether this candidate is being truthful.

        votes. Sign in to vote
  4. Attn. esteemed Senator Scott Wiener. Please rescind your endorsement of school board candidate Josephine Zhao.

    You are a champion of several LGBTQ bills, and are currently sponsoring an excellent bill in support of trans inmates. In the case of Zhao, it seems that you’re allowing quid pro quo politics to grossly trump your personal ethics. As your constituent, and in light of Eskenazi’s reporting, I urge you to unequivocally reject Zhao’s rhetoric and rescind your endorsement.

    Thank you for your consideration. I’ve also extended this message through your SD11 contact page.

    votes. Sign in to vote
    1. Your “esteemed” Scotty Wee Wee is nothing more than a power-hungry, opportunist himself. Best to you in your quest for unequivocal rejection.

      votes. Sign in to vote
  5. WHOAH.. “There are also three homosexuals. Their highest priority for education would be to spread ideologies.”

    This is beyond transphobic. It is outrageously homophobic. And not something a simply apology can easily walk back. Why was that buried so much in this piece?

    Someone please publish this headline: “Zhao privately says school board opponents are ‘homosexuals’ who will ‘spread ideologies’.” Her campaign is toast after that.

    votes. Sign in to vote
  6. Thank you Joe for following up on Zhao’s campaign strategy. It is as I suspected, duplicitous and racist. The Chinese community has some very legitimate fears of being manipulated and marginalized. Like Trump, Zhao is exploiting and reinforcing those fears.

    Have you or other school board candidates submitted op-eds to Chinese language newspapers? I don’t believe most monolingual ethnic Chinese SF residents are hateful at heart. But they decide how to vote based only on the information they’re able to understand.

    votes. Sign in to vote
Leave a comment
Please keep your comments short and civil. Do not leave multiple comments under multiple names on one article. We will zap comments that fail to adhere to these short and very easy-to-follow rules.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *