Racetrack built by early city speculators is gone. But this house is still here.
In a particularly 2018 touch, the home at 1268 Hampshire Street is a condo, part of a tenancy-in-common, and the bidding opens at $849,000 for an 865-square-foot domicile — just shy of $1,000 per square foot.
When Maine-born U.S. Army veterans John and George Treat had this place built, it might have run them $500, estimates San Francisco architectural researcher Gary Goss (that’s about $14,000 in today’s money). The house is listed on the Planning Department’s South Mission Historic Resource Survey as being constructed in 1855 — the oldest structure on a lengthy list.
“Appears to be the original home of pioneer settlers George and John Treat,” reads a note on the survey. “1894 block book shows ownership by Jno. Treat. Appears to have been moved onto lot from area slightly east. Now has large rear addition.”
Moving homes was common in this pre-permitting, pre-seismic-engineering era. A 2010 Mission Local article about this structure notes that it sits “near its current location” on an 1861 map. George Treat liked the ponies and, in the wide-open San Francisco of the 1850s, that meant he could build his own race track. Pioneer Race Course, the city’s first, stood just west of his home.
Planning documents note that George Treat eventually sold off the racetrack for residential development and, likely, arranged for the San Francisco-San Jose railroad to run nearby through his land. On top of being farmers and ranchers and, in George’s case, an “ardent abolitionist” and member of the city’s First Committee of Vigilance, the Treat brothers were also, clearly, real-estate speculators.
The house may have served as the home base of what was once a small empire for the Treats, who owned sizable swaths of land across the city. George bought up the area on which General Hospital now stands, while his brother owned tracts in the Sunset near Golden Gate Park. Treat Avenue is named after the brothers.
The claim that this home is the city’s oldest is difficult to confirm or deny. “Could be a very early building,” is the vague, handwritten summation at the bottom of a 1976 city report. And then, the even vaguer, “history may be important here.”
While the city’s historical survey lists the building’s construction at 1855, the Planning Department puts it at 1907. That’s not surprising, however. The city burned in 1906, eradicating nearly all old records and, to boot, the nascent city burned a number of times between 1849 and 1859, around when this structure was possibly being constructed.
There were also far fewer records to burn in that era. “You didn’t need to have permits,” notes Goss. “They did have directories. If you’re lucky, you may have been in a directory if you lived near a lake or something.”
The listing agents for this home, Edward Deleski and Jean-Paul Samaha, were unaware of its history beyond the 2010 Mission Local article. The seller, Samaha, says, he has not owned the building for long. The listing does not note the home’s pedigree as perhaps the oldest in all San Francisco. It does, however, emphasize the “master suite w/spa-like bathroom” and “Duravit soaking tub and custom tile work.”
It also mentions the prime location and access to Muni and BART. But not, for good or ill, a steam train. Or a race track.