Gloria Duarte, 65, had lived at 24th and Folsom for 33 years.
Those years weren’t always easy ones: The Victorian-style, six-unit building had numerous reported code violations — faulty smoke detectors, no heat, blocked fire exits, unsanitary conditions — and, last year, a resident in the building was reported to the police for wielding a machete in public.
Months later, that same man got into a fight inside the building. Next, his curtains caught fire.
Then, on May 3, 2025, another fire broke out in his apartment. Even though the fire did not spread to other units, smoke and water damage rendered the entire building uninhabitable. All four tenants, including Duarte, were displaced.
Now, three of them are suing, hoping to prod the landlord of the building at 2782 Folsom St. into getting a move on with repairs. The tenants also want compensation for Duarte and the other tenants, for what they say are years of negligence that resulted in them being forced to leave their homes.

“I’ve lost all my belongings because they never took care of us or the building,” said Duarte, who is living in a friend’s basement in the Bayview, in Spanish. Her son, who shared her apartment, is sleeping in his car.
Duarte’s plight is not unique. Tenants attorneys and housing advocates say tenants displaced by fires in San Francisco often face difficulty moving back into their units. How many is unknown, because the city’s rent board does not keep data on the number of tenants who return home after a fire.
Attorneys said few tenants displaced by fires, even fires that are the result of a landlord’s negligence, are ever able to move back.
“The problem is that the city doesn’t regulate after the fire,” said Rahman Popal, a tenants’ attorney who is representing Duarte and the other plaintiffs.
“There’s no penalty explicitly in any of these statutes that says, ‘If you don’t act diligently, if you use this as a reason to upgrade your units and essentially try to force your tenants out, you’re going to be penalized,’” Popal said.
Joseph Tobener, a tenants’ attorney at Tobener Ravenscroft, said he has seen tenants wait up to 10 years to return to their apartments after fires or major repairs. Negotiations between landlords and insurance companies, plus a slow permitting process, play a part in the delays, he said.
Landlords also can reap significant financial benefits in delaying repairs, Tobener said.
Tenants in rent-controlled apartments have the right to move back at their prior rents once renovations are completed. After fires, however, landlords often seize the opportunity to make more significant changes to the affected units, according to Tobener. Often these additions are unnecessary for a tenant to reoccupy.
That extends the construction timeline by months or years, he said, and landlords often hope tenants will just give up. Then, rent for new tenants goes up to market rates.
The building at 2782 Folsom has had plenty of problems.
According to city records, the building, which is owned by SF Mission Tierra LLC and lists Sheena L. Chang as its agent, had received nine orders of abatement (a final notification to correct a violation on a property) from the Department of Building Inspection since 2023.
These include notices for unsanitary conditions, life safety hazards, dilapidated structural conditions, overflow of garbage, faulty smoke detectors, out-of-date fire extinguishers, and a blocked emergency exit.
On Oct. 18, 2024, the property also received a notice of violation from the fire department for not having working smoke detectors. According to city records, at the time of the May 3 fire, three of the nine abatement orders had been resolved, not including the smoke detector violation.

The building’s owners and management did not reply to a request for comment.
“It’s been an awful treatment by the owners. They haven’t communicated or said anything to me,” said plaintiff Manuel Lobos, 67, in Spanish.
Lobos, a retired construction worker, lived at 2782 Folsom St. for 26 years. At the time of the fire, he had to escape the building on crutches.

For now, he’s living with his mother and brother in the Excelsior, traveling to dialysis three times a week. He’s using crutches since a knee surgery, and awaits a determination on a potential surgery on his other knee.
“I miss the Mission,” said Lobos, who still hasn’t been able to retrieve most of his belongings, including his tools and his wheelchair.
The tenants’ lawsuit argues that SF Mission Tierra was negligent in that it failed to adhere to the fire and building code, and the danger imposed by the machete-wielding neighbor.
The suit also alleges that after the fire, SF Mission Tierra removed tenants’ belongings from their apartments without prior notification, and tried to persuade tenants to take their security deposits back without informing them that this would nullify their right to return.
None of the plaintiffs accepted the money. Tenants’ efforts to collect the rest of their belongings and to get information about repairs to the building have been unsuccessful.
Popal, the attorney representing the tenants, said he’s seen this behavior from property owners many times before. City ordinances meant to pressure landlords into fixing up blighted buildings have had limited success.
Popal also represented an older Latina woman who was displaced from her home at 1452 48th Ave. after a fire in 2021, alleging the landlord claimed issues with the insurance, asked the tenant’s son to transfer her to a senior home, and offered her an illegal unit in a garage instead of moving her back into her unit.
The case settled for $750,000 in November, the same sum that Duarte and her co-plaintiffs are seeking now.
Sitting in the garage at his brother’s house, Lobos said he longed to return to his apartment, despite its many problems.
“I could just go across the street to the store and the panadería,” he said. “It was my neighborhood for so long, and I knew everyone.”


So is the argument to make evictions easier? Because otherwise I’m not seeing how the landlord could have kicked out machete guy.
They could have tried? Are you skipping the part about the smoke detectors intentionally or did that just come from skimming the article? If the landlord can’t even bother to abate 4/9 cited issues that’s not trying very hard, is it.
So there were a total of four tenants? And three of them are suing their landlord?
Should we assume that the 4th tenant who is not a party to the action is the one who started not just one, but both of these fires? The second fire being the one that caused the building to become uninhabitable?
Why assume a guess is correct? Maybe, or not.
“years of negligence that resulted in them being forced to leave their homes”
I think it was mainly the machete wielding serial arsonist that forced them to leave their homes.
And I think you managed to ignore this paragraph: “These include notices for unsanitary conditions, life safety hazards, dilapidated structural conditions, overflow of garbage, faulty smoke detectors, out-of-date fire extinguishers, and a blocked emergency exit.”
Funny how that just escaped your attention.
Cynthia, every building has some code violations. The important thing here is whether any of them contributed to this fire.
Since the fire was started by a clearly insane tenant, I suspect not.
Apologist for 9-times health and safety code violations of which 3 were solved, bravo reader.
You are an apologist for all things incompetent.
So missing functional smoke detectors, in your grand wisdom, did not possibly contribute?
Where did you say you espoused wisdom?
Do you have any actual evidence that a working smoke detector would have made any difference?
Funny you blame that and not the nutjob machete-waving tenant who started the fire.
And now the machete wielding arsonist roams around the neighborhood blitzed out of his mind, shouting obscenities. He’s one of the regulars going between 21st and 22nd on Shotwell, as well as still hanging out near that house. He’s been a problem in the area for at least a decade.
Well, if you vote for progressives, you reap what you sow: Far left policies, combined with the likes of Tobener who’s biting at the bit to spend your hard earned taxes ‘free’ from the city get you these results.
Tenants, it’s time to face reality and to move on. (same for owners after a fire, sometime your life is not worth the hassle of the years & years it takes to rebuild). Don’t waste your breath living in the past with the dream of 1990 prices forever. The only one who wins is the lawyer.
Be well, look forward.
LOL, shove off in defense of a shoddy landlord already.
Law has nothing to do with politics. The landlord didn’t do their job.
This is scary how much it overlaps with my life right now. I bet a lot of people are living like this. I know my impression is that my landlord would be happy if my building burned down. And getting rid of subtenants who create repeated fire hazards is a years long many thousands of dollars process.