The city has calculated what President Donald Trump’s so-called Big Beautiful Bill will cost San Francisco. It’s not pretty.
According to a report put together by the Department of Public Health and the Human Services Agency, the city will lose up to $315 million annually by fiscal year 2027, both from the Trump administration making direct cuts to federal programs that return tax revenue to the states, and from new federal rules that are intended to make it harder for low-income individuals to access welfare programs.
That loss will go up to $400 million by 2038.
Between 25,400 to 50,500 San Franciscans are projected to lose Medi-Cal coverage, and almost 20,000 could lose CalFresh benefits by the end of 2027, according to the report.
That would result in fiscal losses for both the Department of Public Health and the Human Services Agency, which connects low-income residents to public services like health care, jobs and food programs.
“These changes at the state and federal level represent a real threat to San Francisco — to our residents and to our budget,” Mayor Daniel Lurie said in a statement.
“Over the next several months, I will work with the Board of Supervisors, community leaders, and residents across the city to ensure we take care of San Franciscans and deliver another responsible budget that supports our residents and strengthens our recovery,” he said.
The Department of Public Health expects to lose $90 million to $180 million a year starting in fiscal year 2027-28 due to more people losing eligibility, and cuts to Medi-Cal payments and safety-net funding.
The Human Services Agency would lose $26 million a year in federal funding since the federal share of CalFresh administrative costs will be reduced from 50 percent to 25 percent.

On July 4, 2025, Trump signed into law his One Big Beautiful Bill Act of 2025, a sweeping, 870-page law that makes significant tax changes and enacts long-term cuts to programs such as Medicaid, which funds Medi-Cal, and SNAP, which funds CalFresh. It also slashed aid to students.
Currently, almost 216,000 San Franciscans rely on Medi-Cal for their health insurance through the Human Services Agency, according to the report. The Trump bill’s cuts to the program would decrease enrollment by 12 to 23 percent.
Undocumented immigrants who are 19 and older will also no longer be able to enroll in full scope of Medi-Cal starting Jan. 1, 2026 — but that’s not due to the feds but, rather, the budget approved by Gov. Gavin Newsom and the state legislature. Undocumented immigrants who have enrolled may lose coverage permanently if they missed the required renewal steps.
Starting in January 2027, Medi-Cal will start checking people’s eligibility every six months instead of just once a year, which means more paperwork and more chances to lose coverage if forms aren’t submitted on time.
Federal changes will also make it harder to access CalFresh, which is California’s name for the federal food stamp program called “Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program,” or SNAP.
For the first time in 20 years, many adults will have to meet certain work requirements in California to qualify for CalFresh. San Francisco’s DPH expects that about 21,000 people could lose access if they fail to turn in the right paperwork proving they are exempt.
San Francisco has been preparing for such impacts. On July 15, the city passed Lurie’s budget proposal, which includes $400 million in reserve in anticipation of federal cuts. Lurie’s office made the choice to shore up reserves, despite an $800 million deficit in the city’s $15.9 billion budget.

Because the projected city budget losses come almost entirely due to stricter rules for Medi-Cal and CalFresh, and because work eligibility verification is handled by the state, spending more to help residents keep their benefits is one way to try and head off the budgetary disaster.
Helping residents to stay enrolled despite the more onerous federal requirements could look like improving reporting systems, adding staff to help with paperwork, and expanding workforce services to help clients meet work requirements (like helping someone who is caring for an elderly relative get registered as an in-home caregiver).
This could cost tens of millions of dollars annually — but pay off in terms of keeping federal funds flowing locally.
The city’s top priority is to keep people enrolled in Medi-Cal. For those at risk of losing it, the city is also looking to expand Healthy SF, a program at the Public Health Department that provides healthcare services for those who are ineligible for Medi-Cal and Medicare.
As of September 2025, about 2,900 individuals are enrolled in Healthy SF, according to the report.
The Department of Public Health also aims to boost Medi-Cal revenue by $550 million over two years through better documentation and billing. The Human Services Agency will work to reduce CalFresh payment errors to avoid federal penalties.
“Despite these actions, the City will face difficult financial decisions, and we will need to prioritize programs, services, and staffing,” the report read.
“City and County departments will closely monitor any actions taken by the State including actions taken by State agencies such as CA Health and Human Services.”
This story has been altered to note that changes to Medi-Cal coverage for undocumented immigrants over age 18 are due not to the feds but the state of California.


TAX THE RICH !!!!!!
Ironic YIMBY comment is ironic.
People need to work!
Okay, but where? Many companies do not offer health benefits these days, taking advantage of the program- Healthy San Francisco. Also, I just complete a job training program from-Felton, that was suppose to give me job training and computer skills, they got a ton of money from the labor dept.,but I and others in the program, did not gain, any real computer skills. We would have been better off going to the public library. Also, to add to the ranks, of the un and underemployed will be-AI.Think before you post.
Is defending Trump’s incompetence your job?
Are you working at the moment?
Also scary: A quarter of San Francisco reports annual taxable income below $15,000 for a single person, or $44,000 for a family of four.
That’s about 80-100k/yr less than the local “low-income” threshold.
All the YIMBY talk about building low income housing doesn’t even come close to helping the real victims of the housing crisis while they rush top dollar condo towers.
Sorry, for the others, but so glad,I started my:Big Beautiful Vegetable garden decades ago, plus I seldom eat meat or drive. Trump, and the people that voted for him, should really be ashamed.Also, did’nt he give Argentina $400 million dollars, to bail out it’s government, without blinking an eye?
Trump is spending San Francisco money on murdering South American fishermen.
+ propping up Argentina’s economy because Billionaire buddies.
So true! Didn’ tRUMP just give Argentina 400 million dollars, to bail out their failing government? And they in turn stabbed us in the back, by going after the Soy bean, market in China.
Thanks for reporting .
Healthcare costs and insurance go up.
If we had a national health care system that would be great but will not happen.
As mentioned , over 200, 000 persons in SF on Medicaid .
That is shocking and disturbing .
Are they all disabled ? Then they would get Medicaire .
This points to the main problem in SF .
It is a welfare city .
That a quarter of the residents are getting medicaid must be explained .
Why are they not working .
The handouts here are out of control and not sustainable .
Why arent these persons working to help pay for their costs .
It is beyond selfish and unfair that taxpayers in SF need to pay for all these persons .
Too many handouts.
If you cannot find work then move to another city where the work is like most would and should do.
Enough of this expecting hardworking persons who pay for their rent food health insurance while many hang out , work a little to keep under the max pay to qualify .
What about job requirements .?
Tired of supporting addicts who get free room and board for 6k/ month and continue to use drugs and are entitled .
The welfare state in SF is ruining this place .
Step up or step out .
This city enables babysitting , wow is me and buys into the loudest voices who think they deserve more when they contribute nothing .
Harm continues
The city is a garbage dump , has 35 k employees on the payroll .
Time to get these people employed .
Game is really old .
Too many scammers in this city .
Grow up
A quarter of sf population on the grift for health insurqnce?
That is what is concerning.
If disabled you get medicaire .
Otherwise you are not working or just working a little to qualify for this .
Get a job
Move there are plenty of jobs elsewhere
Taxpayers who work hard should not be paying for those that are scamming and gaming the welfare money .
Do drugs all day , get free housing for 6k/ month and free health care .
Way wrong
Sf government needs to stop this now .
How about a job
Stopping in twice amonth to show that you tried at two places to get a job should not qualify you for medicare .
The systemremains broken
And somehow I know that our mayor and (most of the) board of supervisors will find the money to increase our police and sheriffs’ departments budgets next year with no oversight on overtime. The money exists in this city to pay for all these services if we just taxed the multi-millionaires and billionaires who live here appropriately and reprioritized how our city spends its money
I entirely agree that the city needs to reprioritize how we spend our money. More law enforcement and less social services.
Law enforcement isn’t really precluded by the amount of money spent on it. They lack candidates and they lack leadership. They pay retention bonuses, allow them to moonlight, allow them to double-dip pensions while on salary, allow them to fully abuse overtime policies, and none of that seems to be tipping the scale. It’s not an issue of not spending enough on law enforcement.
You’ll never get through to these people. They can’t read.
They won’t.
And where are they? Not at 24th and Mission, which has not only become a 3 ring circus of illegal vendors, but it’s dirty and virtually impossible to access by disabled people. Oh! I know where they are! They’re at union square, with their mobile police unit, guarding the Apple store.
Agree. Far too much of our tax money is squandered on failed social policies like “harm reduction” and “housing first” while other important priorities like infrastructure and disaster preparedness go unmet. And if illegal immigrants are kicked off of medi-cal or in-state tution rates becuase of this, that’s great.
You obviously don’t understand that more people kicked off health care means more crowds in the ER when your mom has a fall, or dad gets sick. Maybe you just don’t care about anyone or anything so long as you can stick it to the poor and immigrants?
What’s the disaster that we’re not preparing for that kicking people into homelessness and preventable illness would solve anyway? I call BS on your trope.
Every dollar misallocated to supporting illegal immigrantion or perpetuating addiction is a dollar that cannot be spent on something else. These two segments of the population consume far, far too much of our tax revenue. The city has ungodly sums of money at its disposal. Sometimes a little financial stress can be a good thing if it refocuses priorities.
Sman is confusing the issue of people who have lived their entire adult lives in the US as workers (and taxpayers, yes) without major criminal offenses… with the controversial policies regarding addiction harm-reduction which actually AIMS to reduce addiction, not perpetualize it.
Sman does so deliberately. Having a valid point of view on one issue however does not make an invalid point of view on another look any less false.
Trump said he’d go after CRIMINALS, drug dealers and human traffickers. He’s going after farm labor, people taking their kids to school.
Republicans who still call themselves that with pride have got to stop lying to themselves.
And the sheriffs wil make extra money by posting naked women that they’ve taken with their body cameras, on porn sites, I hope those poor women sue the city.
State of Jefferson, anyone?