Hundreds of protesters lined up along San Francisco City Hall’s hallways today to push back against Mayor Daniel Lurie’s proposed budget cuts, saying the mayor is starving food banks, language-access programs, legal aid, housing and other services in need of funding.
The mayor’s budget includes $200 million in nonprofit funding cuts over two years. It maintains funding for the police, sheriff’s and probation departments, including for a jail annex in San Bruno that was intended to be temporary.
The mayor has also sliced away 1,400 city jobs, only 470 of which would immediately save the city money, Mission Local found.
The proposed budget has been contentiously received in San Francisco: 1,000 people protested the cuts on the steps of City Hall earlier this month.
Lurie has until the end of the month next week to finalize the budget and close San Francisco’s $800 million deficit. The Board of Supervisors’ Budget and Appropriations Committee will deliberate this week and negotiate with the mayor as his budget deadline races to a close next Monday.
Organizers whose funding has been cut are scrambling to put pressure on the mayor before the budget deadline on June 30.
Standing behind a velvet rope that snaked up and down the hallway, about 300 people lined up outside the legislative chambers for public comment that, as of 1:45 p.m., had lasted about three and a half hours. The supervisors were expecting a long day, and had cancelled their lunch break.
Inside, supervisors Connie Chan, Chyanne Chen, Matt Dorsey, Joel Engardio, Rafael Mandelman and Shamann Walton sat for hours of comments and drifted out of the chambers for brief breaks.



“Today, you see all the lines of people here demanding a fair and democratic budget. They are not asking for handouts, they are not asking for charity,” said Jose Luis Pavon, a care manager at San Francisco nonprofit HOMEY, at a press conference organized by the People’s Budget Coalition, an organization of nonprofits and unions impacted by the cuts. “We’re asking for our fair share of the budget. All of us work, all of us contribute to the tax base here.”
Several nonprofits are in danger of closing if proposed cuts are not reversed, organizers said.
Project Homeless Connect, which was founded in 2004 by then-Mayor Gavin Newsom to provide drop-in services and street outreach to San Francisco’s homeless population, is in danger of losing 93 percent of its funding, effectively closing the organization.
“This isn’t just a budget cut; it’s a severing of frontline care,” said Pamela G. H., executive director of Project Homeless Connect, in a statement to Mission Local.
“We are a cost-effective, trauma-informed access point that prevents crises before they escalate,” G.H. said. “Eliminating PHC would leave thousands without a lifeline.”
“The city charter grants an excessive amount of budget authority to the mayor,” Joe Wilson, the executive director of Hospitality House, said during the press conference. This year, Lurie controls about $2.3 billion, or 15 percent, of the total $15.9 billion budget. The supervisors control tens of millions — orders of magnitude less.

“By the time the budget gets to the Board of Supervisors,” Wilson said, “we’re dealing with pennies, not dollars.”
At one point, Janelle Coronado, a development coordinator at Open Door Legal and a survivor of domestic violence who has previously received legal aid, took out a pair of shears and cut off her hair in protest.
“I hope this is the only chop we have to make,” she said, as the Board of Supervisors looked on, frozen in apparent shock.
Several protesters dropped homemade banners from the third-floor balcony, revealing three messages: “Stop cuts,” “¡No mas recortes!” and “New jail steals $$ from crucial services.”
Two organizers from the People’s Budget Coalition revealed banners reading “Tenants’ rights” and “Immigrants’ rights” on the rotunda’s steps. Chants of “Whose budget? Our budget,” echoed through the building.
Two hours into public comments, representatives from the People’s Budget Coalition lined the second and third floor balconies of City Hall’s rotunda. They held yellow posters reading, “No new jail! No cuts!” referring to the continued funding for the jail annex in San Bruno.
Officers from the San Francisco Sheriff’s Office confiscated the banners about five minutes after they dropped. The protests died down shortly after, but the long line for comment remained.
Adrian Tirtanadi, the executive director of Open Door Legal, a legal aid nonprofit that stands to lose 60 percent of its funding for civil legal services, waited for hours outside the hearing room, leaning on a cane out of exhaustion. Tirtanadi is on Day 13 of a hunger strike protesting cuts to civil legal aid.
Public comment ended at 6:47 p.m. Several people said that they had waited seven hours to address the supervisors, and had just one minute to speak.
“I appreciate all of you coming out today. You are all here to hold all of us accountable,” said Supervisor Connie Chan, chair of the Budget and Appropriations Committee at the conclusion of the nearly nine-hour meeting.
“Whatever we do, we do have to make some reduction in the next 48 hours. How we restore some of the cuts — I’m not sure where we are heading just yet,” Chan said.
The Budget and Appropriations Committee will meet again on Wednesday before the mayor finalizes the budget by the deadline next Monday.


I am fine with the cuts.
A lot of these programs are just fluff and badly run, squandering our taxes as we’ve seen in the news.
We have a deficit, and we have a crime problem, we need the jail.
We have a city to run and some chops are fine. So many of these non profits were just raking it in over the years. I’ve sen firsthand how out of control if can get. The city is not a piggy bank for every whim.
I’d bet few commenters here have actually bothered to read what’s being cut. A partial list:
Essential social services: $6.4 million
Safe and healthy homes (DBI): $4.8 million
Crucial homeless services: $1.5 million
Immigrant legal services and community anchors: $2.3 million
Unspent Prop. C housing fund: redirects $93 million
Food security, oral health, and physical activity (DPH and DCYF): $3.5 million
Seniors and people with disabilities: $3 million
City College: $10.6 million
Workforce development: $15.1 million
Arts Commission: $1.5 million
Climate Action Plan: $437,000
Public health redirects to jail (DPH): $9.2 million
Youth health programs: $10.5 million
A lot of the actual workings of city government go unseen. Cutting these (while overfunding the police) is sheer folly.
Yeah, because all those homeless “services” are working so well.
“Essential” according to whom?
You could’ve tried a bit harder to get a quote from someone who doesn’t make a living off the city’s largesse.
“They are not asking for handouts, they are not asking for charity,“
I wonder what they think free housing is.
Gotta cut something. There’s way too much magical thinking in San Francisco.
Hundreds protest? OK, let’s be charitable and say it was 800.
The population of the City is 800,000. So what you meant to write was that only one city resident in a thousand cared enough to attend the protest? Or put another way, 999 out of every 1,000 did not?
Why are you assuming they’re residents? Many, if not most, nonprofit employees employed by city grants live outside the city.
There is an aspect of mercenary administrators of colonial occupation involved with the nonprofit classes.
Maybe if they spent less time protesting and more time working and paying taxes like the rest of us, the city wouldn’t be so broke
Cut off the legions of parasites !
Nine hours! Why anyone would want to be on the Board of Supervisors is beyond me. Aside from the occasional theatrics, these public comment sessions are basically the same talking points distributed via social media, repeated over and over again.
I think most of the nonprofits in San Francisco is the biggest scam that you could ever come up with a lot of those people complaining because they be cutting you’ll be cutting funds off. They been scammed San Francisco for years and they don’t do shit for no one in town or anywhere in San Francisco
I was accessing city funded legal services that I learned would end next week. Life is a bitch and you figure out now to get along.
I really want to see these budget fights ritualized into round robin steel cage death matches of the nonprofiteers for our entertainment value.
They can all raise their own funds! Not everything has to be paid by the people who are overtaxed anyway. Many of those nonprofits are wasting money on their operational costs and very little help is provided to those in need ( as we’ve seen scandals un the news)!
Thanks for reporting
Never have seen any one of these persons , groups or nonprofits on Lower Polk / Larkin
I want my taxpayer money to go to benefit groups that will help the out of control sidewalk drug addicts , homeless and residents where I live . Have been waiting for over seven years.
I have no problem with these group protesting but others are in need .
Time to look for another job .
Appreciate their efforts but no money for their salaries from taxpayers .
That annex reminds me of something that most people don’t know about, but I will keep tight lipped until I get to speak my truth. Our world is in crisis. When I get my chance to help or if I could, but they have knocked me down. Keep fighting for the greater good, but with peace. Goodness always wins.
Every County has to cut their budgets. San Mateo County is the Same.Folks, the free rides are ending and reality of what MAGA Harriet is setting in, even here in the liberal bubble of technology’s birthplace. We will have to pull back the punch bowl for awhile, let all the partiers sober up, get back to work and design or invent the next new thing to bring the City and Silicon Valley back to life. If the ticks and fleas drop off in the process of reinvention, so be it. Shit happens
Apparently you haven’t heard of artificial intelligence.
In shocking news, person whose ox is about to be gored demands ox not be gored, asserts their ox is very important ox.
These are the real heroes.