Two women stand at a podium with multiple microphones. One woman speaks while the other looks on. Behind them is a banner with text in English and Spanish and a blue and orange design.
Vilma Arias, who will be evicted from a city shelter by 5 p.m. on Monday. Photo by Xueer Lu. March 10, 2025.

Update: Shortly after this article’s publication, two San Francisco families won a temporary reprieve from eviction from homeless shelters. The original article is below.


The first set of evictions is hitting a group of San Francisco homeless families living in city-contracted homeless shelters who have pleaded with Mayor Daniel Lurieโ€™s office for help avoiding being kicked out, to little effect.ย 

Two dozen families won a meeting with Lurie in late February in which he, according to the families, promised they could stay in shelters if they were making โ€œpositive progressโ€ towards finding permanent housing. Tonight, two of those families are slated to be forced out.

โ€œWe are the first families they are doing this to,โ€ said Vilma Arias, at a press conference in front of Flynn Elementary School, where her six-year-old and eight-year-old are students. โ€œMany more families will follow.โ€ The press conference was organized by Faith in Action Bay Area, a nonprofit that has been helping the homeless newcomer families organize and advocate. 

Arias, a mother of two from Honduras, lives in the city-contracted shelter St. Joseph’s Family Center with her husband and young children. Arias has never been so close to being able to move out of the shelter into more permanent housing; she has a March 20 appointment with Compass Access Point, a city service provider, to go over the options for a rental subsidy.ย 

But for Arias, it is always one step forward and two steps back on the path to housing. By 5 p.m. on Monday, she and her family are scheduled to be evicted from the shelter, no matter that their appointment is only 10 days away. If they don’t leave, she recalled her case manager saying, the shelter will call the police.ย 

Standing alongside Arias at Mondayโ€™s press conference was Maria Flores, a single mother from Peru raising an eight-year-old who also attends Flynn Elementary School. Flores and her son are also scheduled to be evicted from St. Joseph’s Family Center this evening. 

A group of people stand in front of a banner and microphones at a press event. One person holds a photo of a group, and another speaks into the microphones.
Maria Flores, who will be evicted from a city shelter by 5 p.m. on Monday. Photo by Xueer Lu. March 10, 2025.

The mothers are scared and confused at the same time. They recalled how, just 12 days ago, Lurie told them that, so long as they were working with their case managers and making progress toward getting jobs and housing, they would be able to stay in the shelter until they obtained long-term housing.ย 

Under a policy that was paused since the Covid-19 pandemic but reinstated in December 2024, homeless families can only stay in city shelters such as St. Joseph Family Center for up to 90 days with an automatic extension of 30 days. If approved by their case managers, they can get up to two more extensions, stretching their total stay to at most 180 days. 

The two families have been there for about a year. 

The mayor’s office did not respond to an immediate request for comment on these two familiesโ€™ situations.ย 

Emily Cohen, the deputy director for communications and legislative affairs for the Department of Homelessness and Supportive Housing, noted in a statement that the department encourages all homeless families to โ€œactively engage in the resources, extensions and opportunities available to them in order to progress in their journey towards stability and a permanent housing solution.โ€

Cohen noted in a previous statement that it is up to the shelters and case managers to decide whether a family can get more extensions. 

A large group of people gather in a wood-paneled room, some holding up fists. A table with pens is in the foreground.
Mayor Daniel Lurie meeting with homeless families on Feb. 26, 2025, in San Francisco City Hall. Photo courtesy Faith in Action Bay Area.

Jennifer Ferrigno, the legislative aide to District 9 Supervisor Jackie Fielder, said Fielder met with Kunal Modi, Lurie’s policy chief on health, homelessness, and family services, and the homeless department on March 7 to discuss the possibility of amending the 90-day time-limit policy. The two sides agreed to โ€œwait and see,โ€ Ferrigno said, and Fielder will follow up again given the news about tonightโ€™s evictions.

โ€œIt seems nonsensical to us that they have to go back onto the streets and get back on the shelter waitlist,โ€ Ferrigno said. โ€œWe also feel like it’s questionable to experiment and try to tweak a policy that is having real, severe impacts on families right now.โ€

Matt Alexander, the communications director of Faith in Action Bay Area, said that, of the 30 families that the group is helping, six are facing a deadline to move out of their shelters by March 12. About 24 others have one more month of shelter stay, and will need to leave by April 10 or 12.ย 

โ€œNo child and no family, no person deserves to sleep on the streets,โ€ said Alisa Wolf, a social worker at Flynn Elementary School. โ€œSo I demand that our mayor do something to support these families and all the other families in the same situation.โ€

โ€œWe cannot experiment with people’s mental health,โ€ Wolf said. โ€œOur families deserve better. So do your part, Daniel Lurie.โ€

Geri Almanza, the treasurer of United Educators of San Francisco, said Lurie had spoken of his own family during last monthโ€™s meeting, and that he should show more compassion. โ€œYou mentioned your children, and what a nightmare it would be to have no housing for your children,โ€ she said. โ€œThere was a room full of parents and children there, and you told us that you would evict not one family.โ€

As of noon on Monday, five hours from the eviction deadline, the two mothers being kicked out said they had no plan other than taking their belongings and returning to the street. 

โ€œIt’s really scary not knowing where we are gonna go,โ€ Flores said.

Follow Us

I work on data and cover City Hall. I graduated from UC Berkeley Graduate School of Journalism with a Master's Degree in May 2023. In my downtime, I enjoy cooking, photography, and scuba diving.

Join the Conversation

11 Comments

  1. Can the mayor simply decree that these individuals can stay beyond the deadline even longer (and, by extension, tell the families waiting to move in, “too bad, you need to stay on the street”)? He’s not the king. If he told me I didn’t have to pay my mortgage, that would be interesting, but it would have no legal effect. We have laws and policies in place that appear to prescribe the action that is being taken. I confess I’m not familiar with the legal framework, and I suppose it’s possible that somewhere in all the formal written laws the mayor has the unilateral power to simply declare them inapplicable in this scenario, but in general we don’t want to give any one person that power. I feel terrible for these families, but pointing the finger at the mayor seems to be misguided, unless there is something that these articles are leaving out.

    +3
    0
    votes. Sign in to vote
    1. It’s the school of Willie Brown. You just promise whatever you want, then you go have someone buy you lunch and call it good.

      +1
      0
      votes. Sign in to vote
  2. Can we ask about the impacted folksโ€™ backstory? How are they here in SF? Author talks about them being from Honduras. Are they asylum seekers? Some details help to keep the focus on how to solve the issue of limited resources rather than the typical finger pointing.

    +1
    0
    votes. Sign in to vote
  3. If the policy allows extensions up to 180 days (6 months) why have they been allowed to remain for an entire year. Now they’ve been granted another extension. It seems they’re abusing the system. Not working. Just having chats with workers willing to cash their own checks and help them stall while others remain on the street. Send them back to their country. They clearly won’t be able to make it on their own here and shouldn’t be supported for life.

    +1
    -2
    votes. Sign in to vote
    1. That’s not clear to anyone except you, the omniscient curmudgeon, advocating for multiple families to be living on the streets rather than the shelters they exist in now. You know, for budget reasons, as Trump destroys our GDP and furthers your interests, makes sense. More homeless, less money, great job.

      +1
      -1
      votes. Sign in to vote
  4. What have they accomplished, in the year they have been there? Do they also have employment to maintain housing, if they receive it. How do they plan to keep the housing, if they receive it?.

    0
    -1
    votes. Sign in to vote
  5. “she has a March 20 appointment with Compass Access Point, a city service provider, to go over the options for a rental subsidy. But for Arias, it is always one step forward and two steps back on the path to housing. By 5 p.m. on Monday, she and her family are scheduled to be evicted from the shelter โ€“ no matter that their appointment is only 10 days away.”

    -Typical SF, arbitrary rule-following is more important than the actual mission and entire point of having the shelter option in the first place, if you can even get that.

    Oh and great job to lip-service Lurie. /s

    0
    -2
    votes. Sign in to vote
    1. An appointment ten days away after having been in the shelter for a year. How much time exactly is reasonable before anyone can expect anything besides making an appointment in the future from them. Two years, then.. maybe just agree to support them for life.

      0
      0
      votes. Sign in to vote
      1. “If approved by their case managers, they can get up to two more extensions, stretching their total stay to at most 180 days. ”

        โ€œMany more families will follow.โ€

        “no matter that their appointment is only 10 days away.”

        “promised they could stay in shelters if they were making โ€œpositive progressโ€ towards finding permanent housing. ”

        Maybe the integrity of public promises mean less to you than me, but I never voted for Newsom so I’ve never been deliberately burned. You decide.

        +2
        0
        votes. Sign in to vote
Leave a comment
Please keep your comments short and civil. Do not leave multiple comments under multiple names on one article. We will zap comments that fail to adhere to these short and easy-to-follow rules.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *