See below for full election results from across San Francisco, including precinct-level maps and ranked-choice voting results. A total of 412,231 ballots were cast, representing 78.9 percent in overall turnout.
Skip to: ballot propositions, mayor’s race, supervisor races, school board
Click here for the latest election analysis.
Mayor’s race
Mayor London Breed has conceded the mayor’s race, saying she called Daniel Lurie to congratulate him on the win.
Ranked-choice voting breakdown
Note: If no candidate reaches a majority in one round, the candidate with the fewest votes is eliminated and their votes are redistributed. The process is repeated until a candidate reaches a majority.
Last updated on Dec. 3. Data from the San Francisco Department of Elections. *Incumbent.
MORE ON THE MAYOR’S RACE
Explore the first-choice mayoral results by precinct
Last updated on Dec. 3. Data from the San Francisco Department of Elections.
Ballot propositions
All propositions passed, except Proposition D, the commission reform measure, and Proposition F, the police retirement deferral measure.
Last updated on Dec. 3. Data from the San Francisco Department of Elections.
MORE ELECTION ANALYSIS
Explore the ballot proposition results by precinct
Last updated on Dec. 3. Data from the San Francisco Department of Elections.
MORE ELECTION ANALYSIS
Supervisor races
District 1
Connie Chan won with 51.9 percent.
Note: If no candidate reaches a majority in one round, the candidate with the fewest votes is eliminated and their votes are redistributed. The process is repeated until a candidate reaches a majority.
Last updated on Dec. 3. Data from the San Francisco Department of Elections. *Incumbent.
MORE ON THE DISTRICT 1 RACE
District 3
Danny Sauter won with 55 percent.
Last updated on Dec. 3. Data from the San Francisco Department of Elections.
MORE ON THE DISTRICT 3 RACE
District 5
Bilal Mahmood won with 53 percent.
Last updated on Dec. 3. Data from the San Francisco Department of Elections. *Incumbent.
MORE ON THE DISTRICT 5 RACE
District 7
Myrna Melgar won with 53.4 percent.
Last updated on Dec. 3. Data from the San Francisco Department of Elections. *Incumbent.
MORE ON THE DISTRICT 7 RACE
District 9
Jackie Fielder won with 59.7 percent.
Last updated on Dec. 3. Data from the San Francisco Department of Elections.
More on the District 9 race
District 11
Chyanne Chen won with 50.4 percent.
Last updated on Dec. 3. Data from the San Francisco Department of Elections.
More on the District 11 race
Explore the supervisor race results by precinct
Note: Chart only shows first-choice votes.
Last updated on Dec. 3. Data from the San Francisco Department of Elections.
District Attorney
Brooke Jenkins won with 66 percent.
Ranked-choice voting applies in this race, but since there are only two candidates, the results are decided in one round.
Last updated on Dec. 3. Data from the San Francisco Department of Elections.
City Attorney
David Chiu won with 83 percent.
Ranked-choice voting applies in this race, but since there are only two candidates, the results are decided in one round.
Last updated on Dec. 3. Data from the San Francisco Department of Elections.
Board of Education
*Incumbent. The top four candidates will be elected to the Board of Education. Last updated on Dec. 3. Data from the San Francisco Department of Elections.
Community College Board
The top four candidates will be elected as trustees to the Community College Board. Last updated on Dec. 3. Data from the San Francisco Department of Elections.
Treasurer
Last updated on Dec. 3. Data from the San Francisco Department of Elections.
Sheriff
Last updated on Dec. 3. Data from the San Francisco Department of Elections.
BART Board
District 7
Last updated on Dec. 3. Data from the San Francisco Department of Elections.
District 9
Last updated on Dec. 3. Data from the San Francisco Department of Elections.
Turnout
A total of 412,231 ballots were cast out of 522,265 registered voters, representing a turnout of 78.9 percent.
Last updated on Dec. 3. Data from the San Francisco Department of Elections.
About the data
The data was downloaded from the San Francisco Department of Elections. The final results were certified on Dec. 3, 2024.
For state propositions and races, visit CalMatters.
The charts on this page were created and updated by Kelly Waldron. If you spot any errors, please email kelly@missionlocal.com.
Thank you for clarifying in multiple places that votes are still be counted. The way the Chronicle is presenting the results is confusing, but the Mission Local explanations and data read crystal clear.
Thank you for comprehensive local coverage!)
not another billionaire politician ðŸ˜.
As opposed to one who just gets the $ from corrupt SuperPACs and non-profits? I’ll give Lurie’s as-yet clean bill of ethical health a series of years to do “as well” as London Greed’s ‘remunerative social outreach efforts’ to unaccountable dark money. If he’s not trying to get his relatives out of jail or having play dates with Xi, he’s got my 2nd vote for now.
I just hope he doesn’t delete his text messages (or better yet, doesn’t conduct city business by text).
an heir to generational wealth who started a nonprofit to ameliorate homelessness (ok rich dude) and has no political experience seems like a poor choice going into at least 2 years of federal govt antagonism. but i’m so glad lurie was able to pay for canvassers and chinese language ads and that his mommy gave his campaign $1M. i’m glad he’s not london breed, but he’s still just another rich guy who spent his way into office.
“who started a nonprofit to ameliorate homelessness” – This is a gripe? Really? London Breed had ZERO political experience when she started, without even the benefit of a real job at any point. She dithered and doled out SF taxpayer money to her friends and connected goons and the city was completely mismanaged almost the entire time. You think Farrell’s ethical violations would be better than Lurie funding his own campaign why exactly? Yes elections are increasingly money dependent, but that’s the fault (or design) of Citizens United. Breed and Farrell spending Billionaire money (in similar amounts even) that they are then expected to pay back in favors is IMO no better and in fact worse. Lurie has a clean slate. Complaining that he “bought the election” is kind of a weak point considering Breed and everyone else did the exact same things, only less effectively and less convincingly. Monied interests run SF politics, that’s not new FWIW.
Just praying the final count go in the favor of saving the great highway. I desperately need the road to stay open on week days.
Which districts voted yes on Prop K?
Districts 1, 4, 7 and 11 voted against Prop. K, and the rest voted for.
1 and 4 are the only 2 districts actually affected. Hard nope.
Billionaire yuppie-interests circumvented the district election system.
Now they feel emboldened to develop the west side for gentrification.
*(We’ll see those greedy Google lawyers in court for a decade or so. Ocean Beach isn’t for sale, yuppies.)
I don’t get why people would vote on closing the Great Highway to traffic. That’s just the start. Eventually, driving in SF will be illegal. We have sidewalks for walking.
They have a pseudo-futurist yuppie privilege idea that everyone must ride bicycles, as they did during their European vacations, and that everyone works from home like they do. Roads are so passe, everyone is riding China-made e-bikes now to save the world from global warming… oh wait, where does the electricity come from? CA’s dirty grid. But at least they can VIRTUE SIGNAL IN STYLE, right?
Good for the voters of San Francisco with a 77% voter turnout!
in the rank choice vote, can a voter filled up form , say board of supervisors choice, a first and second choice for the same candidate. in counting the second rank do you use machine or hand counting to make sure that there is no two ranked choice vote made for one and a single candidate if it isnt violation of the rule. May view on the case between Marjan Philour vs Connie Chan for supervisory position in district three, at the first counting tally finished Marjan won by a thin Margin defeating Miss Chan, I guess voters alligned themselves between the two candidates and wont make to fill up their second choice. in the counting for the second rank choice Miss Chan won by a margin of thousand and there fishy about this since of my first view stated earlier. And since the second choice ranking are also done by the machine there is now way that the machine can see the violation. Of voting first and second candidate would wind up for one and the same candidate which could render the vote in violation of rules and procedures of rank choice voting unless the said action is explicitly allowed by the rules of rank choice voting. I guess there should be recount of votes for second choice ranking by hand with candidates representative doing the recount. I think is let for go then there is a miscarriage of justice of the candidate who did not violate rules, my suggestion invalidate the vote in the second rank choice if it was a repeatition of the first choice. Please
Interesting how the people who live near the Great Highway and rely on it voted overwhelmingly no on K. And as you move further away from it, the percentage of yes votes increases in an almost circular shape.
How is Golden Gate park shaded yellow in favor of Lurie? Seems weird optics.
“Developers, developers, developers.”
Are other cities as utterly unconcerned with vote counts as San Francisco? They released partial results at 12:30 a.m. last night. We haven’t heard from them since. Seems like a bit of dereliction of duty.
The crypto swindler and VC billionaires had a bad night in San Francisco last night. Their attempted leveraged buyout of San Francisco government has fizzled.
– Farrell paid the Rob Black penalty for sending voters imagery of human feces,
– Michael Moritz could not buy enough discontent to convince the voters to eviscerate commission oversight
– London Breed appears to have sabotaged the Brown/Burton political machine to extinction after decades in power.
Voters chose an old money billionaire over the new.
Nationally and statewide, Democrats have exhausted every distraction from class, criminal justice reform, neoliberal identity politics and out-group cooties, and that finally caught up with them. We can’t resolve identity oppression until people feel economically secure and we cannot put class equity on hold until identity oppression is resolved.
Economic equity can be legislated. Eradicating white supremacy, homophobia and misogyny cannot be legislated and requires a persuasive social revolution. Setting people up to police one another over non-class issues is engineered to discredit the progressive/left political project. The gender theory component of the TQ+ agenda, puberty blockers, toilets and sports is political plutonium that needs to be put on hold until popular support can be built, if it can be built. This nonsense almost cost lesbian Senator Baldwin her seat.
This is not an error, it is all intentional. The Democrats will fight kicking and screaming against change. The national Democrat party is weak and flat on its back. It cannot be allowed to get back up in anything resembling this current form.
The thing about the crypto swindler and the VC billionaire is – they are really, really good at hedging their bets.
Larsen had a bad night? Run a quick search for XRP and see if they’re in the headlines at all. And Moritz? We now know more about that dude than we probably care to. Joe didn’t cover his portfolio, but safe to say he went to bed millions richer than when he awoke. But their preferred SF candidates lost. Sure.
And speaking of white supremacy, it’s comical to hear Dems surreptitiously blaming Blacks and Latinos. Am I missing something?
I don’t always agree with your solutions to local politics, but I actually strongly agree with you on roughly 90%-95% of what you’ve said here.
The Democratic Party is going to have a major reckoning on class, corruption, and economics. Otherwise, they will cease to exist as a party, and the people who care about these things will form a new movement.
The fact Trump got within 5% in New Jersey and got nearly 40% in Detroit isn’t a wake-up call. That came in 2016. This is a full-on revolt.
Hallelujah no Peskin or Preston.
The hippie dippy days of ideology are over. Time to move on and fix this City for all residents. Way to go San Francisco. I’m so proud of you.
“The hippie dippy days of ideology are over. ” – No ideology there, obviously…
Yikes, read something real please. You’ll be better for it.