An SFMTA ticketing officer writing citations. Photo by Noah Arroyo.

The San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency director in charge of parking enforcement has been targeting minority neighborhoods and issuing a disproportionate number of tickets in the Mission, Bayview-Hunters Point and the Excelsior, according to a sworn deposition of the unit’s former deputy director.

Shawn McCormick, the SFMTA parking enforcement director accused of the selective ticketing, would write 50 or more citations within two hours, mostly in the Mission or Bayview, according to the testimony of James Lee, a former longtime deputy director of the SFMTA’s enforcement division. 

In comparison, residential patrol officers average 25 to 30 tickets over an eight-hour shift, according to Lee, a 33-year MTA employee who retired in January.

McCormick, who still holds the $216,000-a-year job as SFMTA’s enforcement director, declined to comment on the allegations. Lee’s deposition — taken in February 2024 — came in response to a lawsuit filed in January 2022 against the SFMTA and the city by former parking control officer Elias Georgopoulos. The retired deputy director was the city’s witness who, under questioning from Georgopoulos’ counsel, spoke about how tickets were issued.

Lee said in the deposition that issuing tickets was not even part of McCormick’s job description. Nevertheless, “He would drive from [his home in] Marin and go over to the Mission to write tickets.” According to Lee, McCormick bragged about how many tickets he could write in a short period of time to encourage his patrol officers. The majority of the areas where McCormick issued citations — in the Mission and Bayview — are neighborhoods where many of the residents are Black, Latinx or Asian.

In the 2022 lawsuit against the SFMTA and the City and County of San Francisco, Georgopoulos alleged that the department’s management created “strike teams” to target neighborhoods where disproportionate numbers of people of color lived, including Bayview-Hunters Point, the Mission and the Excelsior districts. Georgopoulos alleged in the lawsuit that SFMTA management did this because they felt residents of such neighborhoods “don’t know how to fight City Hall.”

“It’s absolutely shocking,” said Eduardo Roy, the attorney who represents Georgopoulos and deposed Lee in February. “The city should immediately conduct an internal investigation to determine why a captain is writing tickets in the Mission. I mean, his job description is not to write tickets; he’s an administrator.” 

He was allegedly so diligent about citations that he worked in the wee hours of the morning. On April 11, 2019, around 5:30 a.m., McCormick’s city-issued 2013 Toyota Prius was reportedly carjacked when he was out issuing tickets near 5800 Mission St., in the Outer Mission. Lee found it a bit unusual that McCormick issued tickets outside of the work hours. Lee found out about the incident at 5:30 a.m., meaning McCormick was already issuing tickets before that; as an acting director, Lee’s working hours were 5:30 a.m. to 2 p.m. 

Issuing tickets off-duty is inappropriate within the department, according to Lee, who, however, was not aware of any discipline McCormick received for this incident.

SFMTA director Jeffrey Tumlin has been aware of the situation for more than three years, according to an email Georgopoulos sent to six people, including Tumlin. Within the July 16, 2020, email, Georgopoulos wrote that his former boss McCormick “targets the Black and brown communities with unfair enforcements.”

The SFMTA declined to answer Mission Local’s specific questions, instead issuing a statement.

“Compliance is our goal — and we allocate parking enforcement resources based on enforcement needs of a particular area,” said SFMTA spokesperson Erica Kato. “We deploy Parking Control Officers (PCOs) to cover the entire city of San Francisco. Areas with more regulations will have more officers assigned to have sufficient coverage of the street regulations.”

The City Attorney’s Office did not comment on the allegation either, instead sharing a motion the city filed on March 8, which concluded that “Plaintiff is unable to produce any evidence that creates a genuine issue of material fact or is sufficient to establish many of the essential elements of his five remaining causes of action.”

The SFMTA did not respond to Mission Local’s request to speak with McCormick. 

“No comment,” said McCormick over the phone. 

The Georgopoulos lawsuit against the city and SFMTA is proceeding and is slated to go to trial on June 24. 

This is not Georgopoulos’ first time in court. As of 2012, the city has reportedly spent about $1.2 million in defending and settling cases he was involved in for alleged assault and sexual harassment. A judge reportedly said in a 2012 ruling that Georgopoulos had a reputation as “a violent and threatening person.”

In his Feb. 27 deposition, Lee didn’t offer an explanation as to the exact reason why McCormick targeted Bayview, the Mission and the Excelsior. In the deposition, however, Lee confirmed that revenue generation via issuing tickets was an important part of parking-control officers’ jobs. 

McCormick would participate in setting annual revenue generation goals and urge employees to achieve those goals, Lee says in the deposition. Parking-control officers were encouraged to ticket more cars that had not moved during street cleaning hours, which was the unit’s number one moneymaker, he testified. “Because they were always out there, and we just didn’t have the staffing,” he said. 

According to a July 19, 2022 complaint, in order to fulfill his promise to SFMTA upper management to increase citations and revenue, McCormick created his own uniform, “dressing like a Canadian Mountie invading Poland,” the complaint said, and went to issue tickets and order vehicles towed. The conduct and McCormick’s keen interest in issuing more tickets won him the nickname “MC hammered” around his station, according to the complaint.

McCormick told Lee that he patrolled the Bayview and the Mission mainly because “they were high volume, as far as the citations, as far as being a complaint,” said Lee. 

Lee also recalled that McCormick had received one public complaint about his behavior for entering private property in order to issue a citation. 

Another time, Lee alleged that McCormick repeatedly targeted an individual tow-truck driver, despite his subordinates finding no clear violations. In his deposition, Lee said that McCormick repeatedly sent him out to cite the driver in the Mission, and checked every time Lee sent someone out to cite that driver. Lee or his subordinate went out 10 times over the course of a few weeks, but did not see any violations. Yet McCormick continued the enforcement, trying to “catch the tow driver in something improper or illegal,” said Roy during the deposition, a feeling echoed by Lee. 

Lee said that such repeated and specific targeting directed at an individual San Francisco resident could be a firing offense. According to Lee, McCormick finally stopped targeting the tow-truck driver when Lee told McCormick that the driver was no longer parking in front of his house, but blocks away at a funeral home. It is unclear why this purportedly led McCormick to change his mind. 

In addition to his claims about the targeting of Black and brown communities, Georgopoulos, who has health issues, also alleged he was discriminated against by McCormick and others at the agency. Among other claims, Georgopoulos, who is Latino, alleged that McCormick, who was his direct supervisor, called him a “spic” to his face on July 16, 2020.

Lawyers in the Georgopoulos case will depose Tumlin in the next couple of weeks, according to Roy. “That this goes on under his watch that they’re targeting minority communities,” said Roy. “That’s an equal protection claim that the city is going to have to deal with.”

Follow Us

I’m a staff reporter covering city hall with a focus on the Asian community. I came on as an intern after graduating from Columbia University's Graduate School of Journalism and became a full-time staff reporter as part of the Report for America and have stayed on. Before falling in love with the Mission, I covered New York City, studied politics through the “street clashes” in Hong Kong, and earned a wine-tasting certificate in two days. I'm proud to be a bilingual journalist. Follow me on Twitter @Yujie_ZZ.

Join the Conversation

22 Comments

  1. How sad for the neighborhoods deprived of their fair share of parking enforcement. Seriously, we need more!! He’s discriminating against the rich neighborhoods.

    +3
    0
    votes. Sign in to vote
      1. I was a parking control officer and this man, wasn’t targeting the black and brown neighborhood, he has been in forcing, those neighborhood because we were to scared to inforce them for year those areas was cited because of fear the PCO would get hurt. Those are isn’t exempt, why should those areas has many violation, blocking dide walks. Double parking expired meters street cleaning violation, it’s about time someone has the balls to clean those areas up, we ticket everyone else what make them so special that they can’t be ticket, And also we have done stings in those areas with the police with us,because ot so dangerous. This law suit is bogus. And yes you can write a lot of tickets if there is violation. Plus this man is salary so why can’t he write ticket anytime, some ticket you can write anytime, blocking side walks Double parking illegal use of handicap placards, those violation has no time limits hours, I hope they this lawsuit fail against him, That Eli person pointing a finger but he has 3 pointing back at him. His past is rotten.

        +1
        0
        votes. Sign in to vote
  2. “He would drive from [his home in] Marin and go over to the Mission to write tickets.”

    I miss the days when Department Heads (and SFPD command staff) had to live in San Francisco.

    +2
    0
    votes. Sign in to vote
  3. Look who is calling the kettle black. The management needs to be overhaul and look really close and careful you might find other illegal activities. Just saying

    +1
    0
    votes. Sign in to vote
    1. Completely Agree! Focus more on lower managements (“The Seargent”) and most if not all Captain’s (lower Admins). They both collaborating their hidden agendas against higher Admins (Director of SFMTA, Director of Parking and Traffic Enforcement and Assistant Deputy Chief of Parking and Traffic Enforcement.

      0
      0
      votes. Sign in to vote
    2. You would by the man who is pointing a finger, the dirt he did, he was one of the worst supervisor, and he should have been hired.

      0
      0
      votes. Sign in to vote
  4. Don’t fire him; pay him more. In five years his pay (for Manager VI) only went from $115,00 to $216,000. The man needs to survive. GG Bridge tolls are going up, so his commute from Marin needs to be considered. And the more he gets paid, the more his eventual pension, so he can live in style. SF’s budget should allow for this. We’re rolling in it, n’est-ce pas? [Seinfeld: “More everything!”]

    +1
    0
    votes. Sign in to vote
  5. One must be proven guilty in a court of law and not by public opinion. Employee can pretty much do anything as long as it is within their position statement (and or “Other Duties as Assigned”).

    +1
    0
    votes. Sign in to vote
  6. @Anna
    You can only write tickets if there’s a violation and some tickets can be wrote any time of day
    Double parking
    Blue zones
    Sidewalks
    Wheels not curb properly
    Cross hatch
    Red zones
    Fire hydrant
    No parking anytime zones
    Bus zones
    Expired tags
    Cover over license plates
    Blocking the sidewalks
    MC on sidewalks
    Hazards
    Just to name a few that can be cited anytime. So this man isn’t writing bogus tickets. I was glad he was out writing tickets,that motivated me.
    Some supervisor was to lazy .
    Or thought they were above that after they became supervisor.

    0
    0
    votes. Sign in to vote
  7. I really hope nothing happens to the head director he has done what they also done is to Enforcement those areas as well this is what they are leaving out plus that supervisor that has the lawsuit is the worst supervisor ever he broke all the rules he got mad because family or friend got caught with an illegal placard and James Lee sweep it under the rug plus he has assaulted people he has sexual harrament charges that the city paid out He has ran plates to find out were people live and got into a fight with them he has done the most and have the nerve to file a lawsuit . Jame Lee knows we have done many targets of those areas because those area has many violation it has nothing to do with race its about fairness
    Those areas violate the most so yes why not ticket those areas ever place in the city get tickets why those areas exempt???

    0
    0
    votes. Sign in to vote
    1. Enforcement follows the rule breakers. Drive around the sunset, then drive thru mission or bayview. More Enforcement is needed, so that is where officers go. Now an administrator writing tickets or targeting indivuduals is another story.

      +1
      -1
      votes. Sign in to vote
      1. We have for years scared to enforce those areas, why should they get off, now someone has the balls to enforce those areas, those two that’s talking was apart of this too. It’s our job Enforcement,

        +1
        0
        votes. Sign in to vote
  8. This story isn’t hard to believe has a former PCO terminated while on workers compensation approved leave . I was not required to be vaccinated while on leave upon my return I submitted a medical exemption from my doctor was told I would be placed on job search because I was considered a threat to other employees over looking my medical exemption and condition I was placed on administrative leave and told by the hiring officer “the reality is you must be vaxed in order to work at SFMTA” this statement was made inspte of there being a document stating medical and religious exemptions were reviewed

    0
    -2
    votes. Sign in to vote
    1. Blame the Mayor, Blame the government
      They only did what was implemented, There is a lot of shady stuff going on there, all that favoritism and Nupatism,
      Family being hired with suspended license People with DUI , ect…

      0
      0
      votes. Sign in to vote
    1. The person that got fired is the correct one to be fired
      Just look at the record and read the article sexual harrament
      Fighting citizens
      Hurting a tow truck driver
      Spraying mace on a black family
      Disrespectful to the head of parking and traffic
      He would harassed people that he didn’t like mostly blacks women and a few men he thought he could intimidate.
      Illegal use of a handicap placard
      Looking up address to confront someone?
      We know why
      Just look at his history
      He’s pointing one finger and got three pointing back at him.
      And Mr deputy director you are a disappointment for backing hime be on
      But I really think he has something on you
      Mr deputy director tell how you all be at work but at the casino see that why I can say you pointing 👉 one finger and three points back at you as well

      0
      0
      votes. Sign in to vote
Leave a comment
Please keep your comments short and civil. Do not leave multiple comments under multiple names on one article. We will zap comments that fail to adhere to these short and easy-to-follow rules.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *