[Pie de foto: el 3 de junio, en este acto de vandalismo hubo una detención y, según una mujer que estuvo presente, también hubo actos de violencia contra los manifestantes]. This act of vandalism led to an arrest on June 3 — and, according to a woman present, violence toward a crowd that may have been questioning it.

A South Bay woman is claiming that a group of San Francisco Sheriff’s Deputies became violent when questioned by crowd members why they were physically detaining a young man. 

Samantha Rhodes, 25, says deputies on June 3 struck her and others with batons without warning; she also says one deputy unholstered his Taser and pointed it at a crowd. 

Rhodes, who recently left a position as a spokeswoman for St. Anthony Foundation in the Tenderloin to attend graduate school, was walking to her car near City Hall at the tail end of San Francisco’s day of protests at about 9:25 p.m.

It was at this time, she says, that she saw three San Francisco Sheriff’s Deputies, identifiable via their tan shirts, put their hands on a young man at Polk and Grove streets, and begin to forcibly pull him away toward Grove. When the man repeatedly asked what he’d done wrong, Rhodes says the deputies responded that they “just wanted to have a talk.” 

Rhodes says she approached the deputies, who wore riot helmets and were not recognizable. Three other men, whom she presumed to be the detained man’s friends, also approached the deputies.

“I walked up to them. I did not touch them. I had my hands in front of me. I asked for an explanation,” says Rhodes. “The three others joined in and asked what’s going on.”  

She says she didn’t get one. 

Rhodes said the deputies did not answer her or the others nor did they give warning regarding what was to come. “In a split second,” she says, the encounter turned violent. Rhodes — who was wearing a sleeveless shirt and tight pants and obviously not concealing a weapon nor wearing armor of some sort — says a deputy struck her once across the forearms. 

She believes at least two of the men who were alongside her were struck as well, perhaps multiple times. Rhodes also said one of the deputies unholstered his Taser — recognizable because of the point of light at its tip and its black-and-yellow coloring – and pointed it at the crowd. 

While San Francisco police officers do not carry Tasers — a long-running matter of no small controversy — Sheriff’s Deputies are equipped with the electric stun guns. 

Deputies, however, do not universally possess a piece of equipment that is now de rigueur for San Francisco police officers — a body-mounted camera. Sheriff’s Department spokeswoman Nancy Crowley noted that deputies on street duty during demonstrations “were not wearing body cameras. We prioritize those resources for deputies serving in our jails.

Crowley said that, at around the time Rhodes alleges a violent encounter between deputies and protesters, a person who allegedly vandalized a Sheriff’s patrol car at nearby Van Ness and Grove was arrested. 

Of note, the vehicle described in the arrest report and pictured at the top of this article, Car No. 273, is not the vehicle depicted in the Sheriff’s Office Tweet. 

A report of that incident states the arrest occurred at approximately 9:30 p.m., after a deputy on a roof spotted a 22-year-old man allegedly spray-painting a patrol car and contacted his on-the-ground colleagues. 

It is not clear if the alleged vandal is the man Rhodes saw being forcibly taken into custody by deputies — the arrestee’s age and build match Rhodes’ description of the man she saw, but she could not confirm it was him when shown a photograph. 

The report says that deputies on the ground intercepted the man and “escorted him on foot to the loading dock of City Hall.” A search of him turned up no “contraband,” so it is not clear if the 22-year-old was in possession of the spray paint can the deputy atop a roof says he saw. He was arrested and booked into County Jail No. 1 on vandalism charges. 

There is no mention in the arrest report of any physical contact between the arrestee and the deputies — and no mention of batons or a Taser whatsoever. 

Mission Local was unable to track down the other men allegedly struck by batons. Messages were left for the man arrested for alleged vandalism, but they have not yet been returned. 

We have also not yet received any video footage of the alleged confrontation from either City Hall or the Department of Public Health headquarters, both of which overlook Polk and Grove. 

Rhodes said it was important for her to push back against the conception that law enforcement showed admirable restraint in the face of large crowds. 

“I didn’t want the story to be that sheriffs and police just stood there with their batons and riot gear,” she said. “Just as they do every day, they brutalized folks on the side streets.” 

Update, Friday, June 12: Mission Local has reviewed security footage from three exterior cameras on City Hall.

The footage neither confirms nor refutes Rhodes’ claims.

In it, the arrestee can be clearly seen being walked into the City Hall loading dock with both arms restrained by deputies. Moments prior, a melee is visible on Grove, near Polk; at one point an officer runs from the loading dock to join it. The gathering of deputies and protesters is far from the cameras, and at the periphery of their field of vision. It is not possible to see whether the deputies in immediate contact with protesters are swinging batons as Rhodes claimed, because they are blocked from vision by deputies standing behind them. No deputy brandishing a Taser is visible on camera, though there are several odd flashes of unknown origin emanating from the crowd.

The footage is, in short, inconclusive.

We promise to keep you informed. Keep us reporting by supporting Mission Local today.

 

Follow Us

Joe was born in San Francisco, raised in the Bay Area, and attended U.C. Berkeley. He never left.

“Your humble narrator” was a writer and columnist for SF Weekly from 2007 to 2015, and a senior editor at San Francisco Magazine from 2015 to 2017. You may also have read his work in the Guardian (U.S. and U.K.); San Francisco Public Press; San Francisco Chronicle; San Francisco Examiner; Dallas Morning News; and elsewhere.

He resides in the Excelsior with his wife and three (!) kids, 4.3 miles from his birthplace and 5,474 from hers.

The Northern California branch of the Society of Professional Journalists named Eskenazi the 2019 Journalist of the Year.

Join the Conversation

3 Comments

  1. Joe,

    The riot goes on, huh?

    Thank God.

    Last thing I want to be at my age is bored.

    Mission Local does not allow that.

    I’m guessing on side of cops here.

    Could be the cops tagged their own car but I almost doubt it.

    However, forever tagged with SF Sheriff’s is the name of ….

    Samantha Rhodes whom I’m guessing lied to cover a friend.

    Know why I say that?

    Cause for 32 years, Michael Hennessey hired only righteous
    people to be Sheriff’s deputies.

    That’s why the SFPOA and Deputies Unions always endorse opposite.

    The SFPOA controls the hiring process that recruits knuckle-draggers.

    Hennessey’s remaining crew from Mike are quite the opposite.

    I’m guessing it will remain the same with Paul Miyamoto.

    He’s toughest guy in City you know?

    Yep, head of the Chinese dragon at yearly parade.

    Trailed by his martial arts students.

    First guy in when there’s a riot small or large at the jail.

    Go Giants~!

    h.

  2. Rhodes approached police detaining someone, bringing it upon herself. The police don’t have to explain what they’re doing to bystanders/accomplices. Nor do they have to wait to be assaulted by a mob. Menace a police officer at your own risk. Just don’t whine about what you instigated afterwards.

  3. It seems to me that the Sheriff’s department is doing worse managing its officers through the protests, relative to the SFPD.

    I’ve seen several Sheriff’s deputies walking around 24th st wearing Thin Blue Line masks, which just seems… out of touch.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *