A panel of city department officials, as well as Supervisors Hillary Ronen and Shamann Walton, addressed about two dozen residents from Franklin Square. "We are working overtime to help people living on the streets," said Walton. "But some of these people have major issues that can only be addressed by experts."

A public safety meeting Tuesday afternoon provided concerned residents an opportunity to address Supervisors Hillary Ronen and Shamann Walton regarding safety issues surrounding Franklin Square.

At least two dozen community members met at Sports Basement near the Potrero Center to express their frustrations with a neighborhood they lamented as befouled with trash, feces, hypodermic needles in the playground, and people acting in intimidating and inappropriate ways, as well as car break-ins, assaults, and other crimes.

One woman said she has yet to return to Franklin Square Park since she was chased and verbally harassed in broad daylight. She now carries pepper spray for protection.

Another man said he’s been observed and followed by people who hide behind the trees and foliage at the park.

An additional problem raised by neighbors is the lack of access to proper restroom facilities for the homeless population.

“Mostly what bothers me is seeing people urinate and defecate in the park, and it has happened on my property four times,” said a resident. “It’s unhealthy and degrading to the people who have to do that, and it’s degrading us.”

Frustrated neighbors reported they have been repeatedly calling 311, but have received little help. Others said they have been receiving mixed signals from the city and are unsure of which response system to call.

Another resident later suggested expanding the Pit Stop Program to provide public toilets at Franklin Square Park.

“This has always been a very tolerant city,” said a man standing in the back of the community room. “Now we’ve become tolerant of homeless people living in the street. The deterioration of the city lies at the feet of the Board of Supervisors. Your tolerance has to end.”

Met by applause, his sentiment also invoked an abrupt remark from a resident, who added, “It’s an embarrassment!”

The supervisors, along with departmental officials, allowed the aggrieved residents to vent for nearly an hour before weighing in.

Larry Stringer, who is the deputy director of operations at San Francisco Public Works, said that his department is working toward improving communication with 311 calls, so that residents will receive notifications when their requests are resolved.

“All I can say is, be patient with us, and I know that’s hard because you’re seeing it on your door every day,” he said. “We are trying very hard as a department.”

Stringer and Ronen noted they will work with Friends of Franklin Square, a volunteer organization, to determine the best location for a Pit Stop toilet, as well as to schedule a walkthrough with the volunteer group and Public Works to address any further issues at the park, such as lighting and trimming of the trees.

Police Sergeant Davin Cole asked residents to continue calling 311, despite frustration, as the messages are received in real-time. Walton said residents are welcome to follow up with his office after placing those reports.

At the end of the meeting, Walton reiterated that while the problems are difficult, “we’re going to continue to work together to address and solve some of these things are happening right now.”

The gathering went half an hour past time, and, at its conclusion, many scrambled for the doors. This neighborhood’s problems won’t be abated in two weeks but Ronen pledged that attendees who left their email addresses would receive an update in that time.

Follow Us

Join the Conversation

8 Comments

  1. Interesting problem. One constructive solution (bathrooms).

    Beyond that NIMBYism runs rampant by the new occupants of SF neighborhoods. Landlords, development types exploit rent control and construction laws for their own benefit. Then cry fowl when another group becomes homeless. Renters and new buyers complain but are frequently part of the same problem (NIMBYism – again) Who will rid is of NIMBYism? fTime – BIG TIME – for major cultural change among SF’s profiteers and Silicon Valley elite.

    0
    0
    votes. Sign in to vote
  2. Looks like the natives are restless. No one to blame but ourselves. We elected these nimwits based upon little other than their liberal, progressive credentials. Did anyone actually expect Ronen to bring what most sane and responsible people would consider tangible, ground level improvements to her district? Her former boss Campos was easily the worst Supervisor the district ever had and she in no way ever repudiated his intellectual laziness and lack of effectiveness. You name a social ill, it got worse, much worse. I still maintain this isn’t her city anymore and it’s not her district. People are scratching their heads in bewilderment.

    0
    0
    votes. Sign in to vote
    1. Robert, I completely agree. I’d like folks in the city to consider recalls of these “progressive” leaders and replace them with practical problem solvers. And yes, Campos was an annoying ideologue. Can’t stand him.

      0
      0
      votes. Sign in to vote
    2. Agreed.
      Our city government and who we a governed by is an accurate reflection of the citizenry of this municipality.

      The majority of those who vote feel the folks they elect are leading us in the right (or at least tolerable) direction.

      There may be a tipping point in the future but the situation will have to degenerate into something worse than we have.
      We’re still a long way from the majority of citizenry unified by outrage and demanding a serious change in direction.

      Perhaps, at some point, all those “middle class” buyers of 1.5-3 million dollar homes will look at their property tax bill and say enough is enough and become a serious voting block. Maybe San Francisco will stop being such a transient oriented city where many are not in it for the long haul and don’t really care about the politics.
      Unfortunately this may result in an eventuality 20 years from now where we start looking more and more like a super enlarged version of Carmel-by-the-Sea with some “affordable” housing sprinkled here and there for the lucky few peons.

      0
      0
      votes. Sign in to vote
  3. The Pit stop toilet sounds like an excellent idea.
    Not only for homeless neighbors, but there are a lot of futbol /soccer players who use the park, and don’t have a restroom.

    If it to hard for Rec and Park to figure out how to put a restroom there, adding the Pit Stop tollets there is a good allocation of resources. But please, have the toliets there are the time the fields are rented out.

    Me, I’ve got faith in Supervisor Ronen to push toward finding solutions, and I recognize that San Francisco has changed greatly.

    0
    0
    votes. Sign in to vote
  4. I have very little faith in politicians like Ronen to do anything to fix the problems. They are generally very risk averse and do not want to do anything that would be perceived as intolerant or anti-homeless. Addressing vagrants, trash, feces, hypodermic needles, etc., is a very low priority for the police too.

    0
    0
    votes. Sign in to vote
Leave a comment
Please keep your comments short and civil. Do not leave multiple comments under multiple names on one article. We will zap comments that fail to adhere to these short and easy-to-follow rules.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *