Police Chief Bill Scott speaking at a recent hearing on Tasers.

Covering the Police is a collaboration with UC Berkeley’s Graduate School of Journalism.

As the San Francisco Police Commission considers arming the city’s 1,795 full-duty officers with Tasers, no one is clear on where the money will come from to pay for them.

“There has been no discussion on funding,” said David Stevenson, director of strategic communications for the San Francisco Police Department.

The consideration of Tasers, which the Police Commission could vote on as early as Nov. 3, is one of the 272 recommendations for the SFPD from a 2016 Department of Justice report.

One of the cost considerations are the lawsuits that could be filed against the city if the devices are used inappropriately.

“The Taser has eight pages of warnings, leaving us open for multiple lawsuits,” District 1 Supervisor Sandra Lee Fewer said last month. “We, as the city and county of San Francisco, would be paying for these lawsuits. That’s eight pages Taser says they are not responsible for.”

At a Board of Supervisors meeting in late September, Fewer asked SFPD Chief Bill Scott how much it would cost to implement Tasers. He was unsure.

“That’s one of the things that, if it goes further, there will be a discussion,” Scott said.

It is unclear when that discussion will happen.

District 9 Supervisor Hillary Ronen echoed other concerns.

“I would ask that you hold off on that [Tasers],” Ronen said. “We have a long way to go implementing the rest of the Department of Justice recommendations. The introduction of this new weapon would hinder all of the great work you’re doing.”

Michael Leonesio, a retired Oakland police officer and owner of the only independent Taser test laboratory in the country, said the SFPD’s technology department will be fighting for any new dollars.

“IT people are fighting for exactly the same dollars,” Leonesio said. “There is aging equipment and very old technology, yet they want to spend $10 million to $12 million to deploy this weapon system.”

Each Taser comes with a number of costs — $1,103 for the Axon X2 Taser, $337 for cartridges, $341 for insurance and $743 for necessary additional tools — that adds up to $4.4 million for the SFPD’s current force. That sum does not account for training officers how to use Tasers.

There’s also the issue of data storage. At present, the SFPD uses Axon’s data storage solution, Evidence.com, to store body-worn camera footage, which costs $79 per user per month. This is estimated to cost $196,000 monthly for the number of body-worn cameras the SFPD now owns.

If the Commission approves Tasers, data storage costs will increase, according to Axon spokesman Steve Tuttle. 

The Axon officer safety plan costs $99 monthly per officer, which includes the costs of the Taser, body-worn camera and unlimited data storage. That brings the SFPD’s storage costs to $219,000 each month.

“These weapons are going to be very very expensive to deploy — and deploy safely and effectively,” Leonesio said in a Commission hearing.

“For a rollout of something like this, by the time you get all of your equipment, software and hardware, all of your training, you’re looking at between eight and 10 thousand dollars per officer to outfit,” he went on. “It’s not an inexpensive proposition.”

Follow Us

Join the Conversation

1 Comment

Please keep your comments short and civil. Do not leave multiple comments under multiple names on one article. We will zap comments that fail to adhere to these short and very easy-to-follow rules.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. And there is no mention of ewuiponb eaach patrol car with expensive difibrillators, to restart cardiac function if subject has a heard attack due to the taser.