Photo by Lola M. Chavez

At an emotional community debate Monday night some 200 Mission residents squared off with top city officials and one another over the burdens and benefits that a temporary homeless shelter will bring to a neighborhood severely impacted by tent encampments.

At issue is the city’s plan to place a Navigation Center – a low-barrier homeless shelter that offers its clients on-site access to supportive services – in a vacant lot and electrical building at 1515 South Van Ness Ave. The property will then be developed into mixed-use housing.

“People are stepping over homeless people, they are finding needles, this Navigation Center is only going to create a bigger problem because it is not a solution, it is only a patch on the problem,” said one nearby resident.

But those who spoke in support for the temporary homeless shelter at a Monday night’s public hearing, said any solution is better than the status quo.

“The situation in the Mission is out of control. The tent encampment on South Van Ness, on my corner, is out of control,” said Navigation Center supporter Tom Temprano, a trustee of San Francisco City College  who lives half a block away from the proposed shelter and also runs a business in the area. “I disagree that the solution to solving this problem is to do nothing.”

Temprano addressed city leaders at the meeting including Mission District Supervisor Hillary Ronen and the heads of the San Francisco Police Department, Public Works and the Department on Homelessness and Supportive Housing: “I want you to solve this problem.”

“If it’s a band-aid, I’ll take a band-aid over nothing and making it worse,” he said.

City officials face the crowd. Photo by Lola M. Chávez

Those who attended the meeting hoping to sway city officials to house the homeless elsewhere in the city, may have left disappointed.

“The decision has been made,“ said Ronen, adding that the Navigation Center will likely be up and running by June 1 and it will be open from six to nine months.  Last month, Ronen struck a deal with the site’s developer, Lennar Multifamily Communities, to allow city use of the space as a homeless shelter until construction permits for the 157-unit housing project are finalized.

Police and fire officials stood by on Monday to manage a crowd that lined the sidewalk outside of the Mission Cultural Center for Latino Arts at 2826 Mission St., which hosted the public forum.

Inside, the center’s auditorium was filled well beyond its 180-person capacity – dozens who were turned away at the door were promised a second meeting in the coming weeks by the district’s supervisor, Hillary Ronen, who called for the meeting.

Photo by William McLeod

Opponents who loosely organized as a neighborhood group under the slogan  “Protect the Mission” came bearing posters that read the “Mission is not a dumping ground.”

The Mission District is already home to the city’s first Navigation Center at 1950 Mission St., which some critics have blamed for a perceived increase in crime and loitering outside of its doors. With the addition of a second shelter on South Van Ness Ave., a number of them voiced concerns that the neighborhood is unfairly forced to bear the brunt of the city’s “homeless problem.”

“Why is this Navigation Center not in the Marina District?” said one speaker who added that she is not opposed to the center per se, but opposes its location. “I walk in the Marina, I walk in the Richmond and everything is clean – no homeless [people]. ”

Ronen defended the Navigation Center and said the temporary shelter is only the beginning of her advocacy for economic equity in her district.

“Does temporary solve the problem? No, but we have a life and death public health emergency on the streets right now,” said Ronen. “I need to do something right now. I needed to do something a month ago.”

Despite the visible opposition, a majority of those who snagged a seat inside of the auditorium advocated for the Navigation Center. All sides, including the city officials present, agreed that the homeless crisis is in part a by-product of the city’s growing wealth gap that is becoming increasingly visible on the city’s streets.

“The dumping of homeless people in the Mission –on Division Street, for Super Bowl City…while you guys were building high rise buildings – has caused this problem,” said a critic of the Navigation Center.

Ronen said that the shelter’s proposed location is a direct result of the need in the area. Of the some 300 people living without a home in the MIssion, an estimated 150 have found shelter in tent encampments of varying sizes throughout the Mission.

With only 8 percent of the city’s shelter beds located in the Mission, the addition of a second Navigation Center – albeit a temporary one – is precisely what is needed to decrease the number of visible tents, and ultimately the dozens of people currently living on the neighborhood’s streets, said Ronen.

Still, Some worried that the temporary shelter could become permanent, should the developers face hurdles in their construction timeline.

“There is no secret plan to form a permanent Navigation Center at this site,” said Ronen.

In an effort to assure the safety of the Navigation Center’s clients and the surrounding residents during this time, a minimum of six staffers would be at the site at all times, said Mohammed Nuru, director of Public Works.

Responding to neighbors’ concerns about loitering on the street in front of the shelter, Nuru said that what is currently an empty parking lot at 1515 South Van Ness will be designed as an outdoor space where clients may congregate.

Calling the proposal a “great opportunity for us to move in a different direction,” Nuru said that encampment sweeps administered by his department that relocate campers temporarily have been problematic.

“It’s a huge problem for our department,” he said. “A lot of resources are being spent.”

The San Francisco Police Department has also spent enormous resources in addressing the city’s homeless crisis. Last year, some 10,000 citations were issued to homeless individuals, some ending in incarceration, said Ronen.

Police Chief William Scott, who attended the meeting, told community members that his department’s role in addressing homelessness will be one of “collaboration” rather than enforcement.

“Part of our past attempt to address this problem has been through enforcement, and we have seen a very ineffective result,” he said, adding that all stakeholders involved in solving homelessness must proceed with “some common sense and compassion.”

Mateo, a 17-year-old proponent of the Navigation Center, agreed: “The homeless are there because an institution refuses to acknowledge their existence. Every place is rejecting them and refusing to help them out.”

Outside of the meeting. Photo by William McLeod
Photo by Lola M. Chavez
Supervisor Hillary Ronen talks to the crowd as other officials look on. Photo by Lola M. Chavez
Director of Public Works, Mohammed Nuru. Photo by Lola M. Chavez
Tom Temprano. Photo by Lola M. Chavez
Photo by William McLeod

Follow Us

Join the Conversation


Please keep your comments short and civil. Do not leave multiple comments under multiple names on one article. We will zap comments that fail to adhere to these short and very easy-to-follow rules.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. I was at this meeting because I received a flyer about a temporary shelter for the homeless to take place at 25th & So Van Ness. The flyer stated to come to the meeting to voice your opinion and to sign a petition if opposed. That wasn’t the case, it was a done deal and the meeting was letting those who attended what to expect. I left when it was announced there would be portapotties and oirtashowers for those not housed in the facility.

  2. The election of Donald Trump as president is going to subtstantially increase the homeless population.

  3. Why is homeless problem in quotes? Is there some question in the author’s mind about whether it’s a real problem?

  4. I’m running low on sympathy as well. My kids walk/bus to school everyday and see people shooting up regularly. Is this the direction we want SF to go?

  5. Let us not forget Darwin…why is it society’s responsibility to keep propping up the irresponsible individuals who contribute nothing to any definition of society but expect to be cared for????

    1. You can dream of some utopian libertarian future when everyone takes care of them selves, no one gets sick, mental illness does not happen, and drugs and alcohol are no longer addictive. Meanwhile we must figure out ways to help them or continue stepping over them on the side walks.

  6. When will Supervisor Ronen put together the votes to end the SFPD policy of containing homeless people and encampments in a handful of neighborhoods? No other residential neighborhood would be subject to the discretionary public policy of containment.

  7. “Save the Mission” is the name of the loosely organized group of white people who evicted the Latino community, got it.
    I believe whole heartedly that every neighborhood equally should and will share the responsibility of caring for those who
    cannot care adequately for themselves, for what ever reason they are in that position…. but…. gentrifiers wanting help to save their
    ill be gotten dominion, hilarious

  8. Thanks for the report. “dozens who were turned away at the door” isn’t quite accurate. There was a line around the corner at 25th up to the alley. Probably another 200-300 people turned away…

  9. Big applause to Ronen for doing what her old boss Disaster Campos never did, as far as I can recall: hold a town hall in the Mission! Your reporting on the meeting gives me hope that she will bring better public engagement to the district.

  10. The city of San Francisco tells me what kind of light bulb I can have in my kitchen. The number of outlets I need and where. I have to follow (and pay!) for all these rules and more yet I am supposed to be sympathetic toward drug-adled homeless who can set up camp and poop outside my door. Well, I don’t have any sympathy left.

    1. “…yet I am supposed to be sympathetic…”

      No, no, not at all. What you’re supposed to be is knowledgeable and worldly enough to understand that everybody poops,

      To clarify:

      1. Everybody poops. No exceptions.
      2. Not everyone has somewhere inside to poop.
      3. That means some people have to poop outside! Because they have nowhere inside to poop, and they have to poop.
      4. We are in a city! That means everywhere is outside someone’s door.
      5. Your door is not that special! No matter how expensive it was to purchase, its mere existence doesn’t magically create inside places for people to poop. It also does not make other people’s doors more worthy of being pooped outside of — because while insides are often different, outside is the same for everybody! Someone who lives outside in the Marina is living in the EXACT SAME OUTSIDE as someone who lives outside in the Mission! Strange but true!
      6. You don’t have any sympathy “left” because you didn’t ever have any to begin with. I know you didn’t mean to imply that you did, everybody makes mistakes sometimes. It’s okay.
      7. Maybe if you did have enough sympathy to maybe help people have an inside place to poop, then they’d have an inside place to poop! Wouldn’t that be great! Then they wouldn’t have to poop outside someone’s door.
      8. Perhaps the someone whose door they wouldn’t have to poop outside of could even be YOU! Wow, this might actually be a problem worth solving, even with no sympathy at all!

      There, you see? It only -seems- like sympathy is expected of you, when all anyone really expects from you is enlightened self-interest. Surely you can manage that!

      Glad I could help.

      You’re Welcome,
      – Tim Johnson

      1. I’ve lived in SF for 18 years. I volunteer at the girls juvenile hall amongst other non profits, I donate money to causes ….Sick of these homeless people who just suck air. I have no sympathy for them. I’m all for getting them out and taking away free services.