Unions Come Out for Ross Mirkarimi

Steve Zeltzer and Brenda Barros speak in opposition of the removal of Sheriff Mirkarimi Wednesday morning in front of the Women's Building.

Steve Zeltzer and Brenda Barros speak in opposition of the removal of Sheriff Mirkarimi Wednesday morning in front of the Women's Building.

En Español.

Members of the press outnumbered Ross Mirkarimi supporters at a news conference held Wednesday morning in front of the Women’s Building on 18th Street.

Representatives from the San Francisco Labor Council, a coalition organization representing more than 100,000 workers from various labor unions, had come to speak against what they see as a politically motivated campaign to oust the sheriff. Earlier in August, the Council adopted a motion opposing Mirkarimi’s removal from office.

Days after he took office as sheriff, Mirkarimi was arrested on charges of domestic violence following allegations of an altercation with his wife, Eliana Lopez. While Mirkarimi settled the criminal charges by pleading guilty to misdemeanor false imprisonment in March, Mayor Ed Lee placed the sheriff in front of the Ethics Commission on charges of official misconduct.

Mirkarimi now awaits a vote by the Board of Supervisors to decide if he will be removed from office. Nine or more of the 11 supervisors must vote for removal in order for Mirkarimi to lose his job.

At the press conference Wednesday, the representatives spoke against the attempt to remove Mirkarimi, characterizing it as both a labor issue and one of politics unjustly motivating prosecution.

“The opponents have no real reason other than a political reason for wanting Ross out of office,” said Brenda Barros, a long-time employee of San Francisco General Hospital and a member of SEIU Local 1021, which represents more than half the city’s employees.

“It is a worker’s right issue for me, that is why I am so adamant,” said Barros.

Rodger Scott, a delegate to the Council and past president of the American Federation of Teachers Local 2121, which represents the faculty of City College of San Francisco, said that the law is being manipulated.

“I see this as a matter of due process,” he said, referring to the criminal proceedings, which he alleges have not been conducted as they would have been with any other defendant.

Steve Zeltzer, a member of the United Public Workers for Action, an organizing committee protecting the rights of California public workers, said that while he didn’t support Mirkarimi politically, he too saw it as a case of justice being corrupted by politics, adding that he can’t support the sheriff’s removal from office.

“We don’t believe that he should be politically prosecuted and it is unethical the way that he is being removed,” Zeltzer said.

The question of domestic abuse had been blown out of proportion, the speakers said.

“When I read the media accounts it sounded like a very severe situation of spousal abuse; however, the more I learned about it, the more I changed my mind,” said Scott.

Barros, the only female speaker at the press conference, said that Mirkarimi’s actions did not warrant his removal from office.

“No male who did what Ross did should be out of a job, and that is my fundamental belief,” Barros said, referring to the incident between Mirkarimi and Lopez.

“I certainly support the prosecution of the people who abuse women,” Scott said. “I believe in this case he made a serious mistake. However, I believe he has paid dearly for this mistake.”

The speakers hinted at a politically motivated campaign to oust a progressive and popular candidate from office. According to them, bias permeated the proceedings, spearheaded by a mayor who received fewer votes than Mirkarimi in the last election.

“The district attorney said in a press conference with a straight face, ‘I doubted his sincerity when he engaged in plea bargaining,’” said Scott. “What district attorney would ever do this?”

For Zeltzer, the bias was evident in what the city has failed to do — prosecute other seemingly more deserving candidates.

“City workers are being harassed and illegally discriminated against; their cause is not being taken up,” he said.

Ultimately, Scott was optimistic regarding Mirkarimi’s fate.

“I think he should prevail. I think he will prevail.”

 

11 Comments

  1. Andy

    So, Union War on Women?

  2. randolph mortimer

    “So.. how long have you guys been beating your wives?”

    • Finally the hard workers and true thinkers have come out with an opinion that supports Ross Mirkarimi.

      It would be a terrible mistake to rid SF of a good Sheriff — what are you waiting for -a dopey cop?

      • Theleona

        There is no thought behind this pro-Mirkarimi effort – only a spin. No one who spoke up for Mirkarimi at the Ethics Commission had apparently bothered to read the documents submitted by witnesses or the testimony of experts. Domestic Violence is not progressive!

  3. Mike

    You guys are being used.

    • Theleona

      This pro-Mirkarimi camp does not speak for all union members and neither does the SF Labor Council, which is dominated by a small group of insiders. For many of this issue is about Domestic Violence not political in-fighting. The group who staged this rally at the Women’s Building did so without the permission or support of this enterprise. This was a poor tactic and no doubt others will follow, such as holding rallies composed only of women to counteract those groups supporting abused such as Las Casas de las Madres.

  4. marco

    At the Women’s building in support of a perpetrator of domestic violence against a woman? How ironic.

  5. madmike

    Ross’ previous ex-girlfriend can also attest to his abusiveness towards women. It took a strong woman to finally alert others about it. This is only the tip of the iceberg.

  6. Joe

    Mirk is definitely a cunning politician to bring the unions into this. The city overwhelmingly supports his ouster (survey results prove this – even in his former district) and Ross gets the unions involved.

    Amazing and not surprising it has come to this. With the unions speaking on his behalf it will influence many on the board of supes who make the ultimate decision.

    The board always go with the unions – they fund their elections and whatever else. Are they paying for Ross’ legal expenses too??

    They have the facts wrong and this is not a minor case of marital relations. There is a bruise, threats and intimidation that Ross was responsible for …

    And of course there’s this little thing called obstruction of justice. The sheriff asked his neighbor to keep this quiet and threatened his wife over it.

    I approached Ross at a Sunday streets last year before he was elected. I thanked him for his years of service and asked him not to run for sheriff. I said San Francisco doesn’t need another career politician. This guy went nuts on me and swore at me and basically physically intimidated me. He’s a lot bigger guy and he encroached my personal space to make his point – while he was swearing at me.

    This guy is a hot head, a yes man for the unions and a public failure. Ross doesn’t deserve to be our top law enforcement official.

Comments are closed.