Supervisors To Consider Firefighting and Cancer Link

  • left arrow
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • right arrow

En Español.

 

The sound of an old fashion dial phone fills the kitchen at the local Mission neighborhood fire station. Laura Carvajal, 30, drops the glass she’s been drying and rushes towards the apparatus. “Fire department, how can I help you?”

Bomani, 42, a fire engine driver, beats her to it.

Carvajal’s father, a retired firefighter, didn’t approve of her choosing a profession  full of danger. Out on a fire, he knew, one could easily become disorientated, trapped or run out of air.  What’s worse, she now knows, is the danger that you can’t see – the cancer that affects firefighters at twice the rate than the general population, according to a study by National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, published in October.

The study shows firefighters have a greater chance of developing respiratory, digestive, and urinary cancers than the general public. Following a push from firefighters, David Chiu, the president of the Board of Supervisors,  is expected to introduce a proposal that would make it easier for firefighters to get workers compensation by presuming a connection between work and a diagnosis of cancer in a San Francisco firefighter.

“In the last few months we had four retired and two active firefighters die of cancer,” said Tony Stefani, an ex firefighter, cancer survivor, and president of San Francisco Firefighters Cancer Prevention Foundation. Well over 200 firefighters in the city died of cancer during the last 14 years, he said.
The study analyzed cancers and cancer deaths of 30, 000 firefighters in San Francisco, Chicago and Philadelphia from 1950 to 2009 and found that firefighters have twice the rates of malignant mesothelioma than the general population.   The problem is the mixture of plastics and other chemicals that become cancerogenic toxins once they catch fire, according to Stefani.

In addition to any exposure to exposed skin, the toxins manage to get through the protective equipment firefighters wear.”They don’t go away, they build up in a body,” said Stefani. “Every time firefighters go into the building they are exposed to these chemicals and have a continuing build up of these toxins in their bodies.“

‘Lucky’ with cancer

Jeanine Nicholson, a captain on light duty at firefighter’s training facilities at the Mission, had been on the force for two decades when she was diagnosed with breast cancer two years ago.

“If there’s ever a good time to get cancer…” said Nicholson, it was then.

Her diagnosis came just months after another firefighter Janette Neves Rivera, a mother of two, went public with her cancer and her fight to get worker’s compensation.

Rivera had to document all the fires she helped to put out to prove that her cancer was work related. While doing so, she ran out of sick leave and vacation time so she had to ask for a catastrophic leave so other firefighters could donate their time to her.  The city denied her catastrophic leave request, saying the cancer was not work related, said Nicholson.

Rivera’s battle, which attracted public attention to the non-flexible fire department’s regulations, made it easier for Nicholson to get her workers compensation papers in order.   “I got lucky,” said Nicholson.

The city authorities never questioned the link between Nicholson’s job as a firefighter and the breast cancer she developed.  Within two weeks of her diagnosis she had a double mastectomy and 16 rounds of chemotherapy. “It kicked my ass,” Nicholson recalled.

New law
The new legislation would make Nicholson’s example the norm rather than exception.

Under the new law, if  a firefighter developed cancer it would automatically be presumed it is work related. Ill firefighters would then be able to access workers compensation benefits and continue receiving a paycheck while in treatment.

Firefighters families could also receive death benefits. Sources at Board of Supervisors President David Chiu’s office said the language of the law was  still being written, therefore, it is unclear if the cancer claims that have been  rejected could be revisited under the new regulation.

Chiu’s office was unable to say when the legislation would be introduced to the Board of Supervisors or how much additional funding its implementation could require from the city of San Francisco.

Family matter

“The bottom line is to take care of those who have put their lives on the line and now that they’re critically ill, they should be taken care of,” Stefani said. It might take well into the summer for the new regulation to take effect. Until that happens, firefighters take every cancer as a family matter.
Nicholson said there was no doctor’s appointment or chemotherapy session a fellow firefighter wouldn’t accompany her to. “People showed up to hang out with me at my house when I was sick as a dog. After my first round of chemotherapy I knew my hair was going to fall out, so I said I’m gonna shave my head. A bunch firefighters came to my house and shaved their heads with me,”  Nicholson recalled.

All worth it

Even with the threat of cancer, Carvajal, like other firefighters, intends to stay.

Back at  Station 7,  Carvajal, who spends most of her time responding to medical calls at present, had just finished another fire engine drill. She remains certain of her choice to become a firefighter.

“It’s all worth it to me. You can’t live life scared. You could die walking down the street tomorrow, you never know – you might as well then do what makes you happy right now,” said Carvajal. “I am happy to do my dream job.”
Nicholson, meanwhile, has just been cleared to return to active duty at Station 13 in downtown San Francisco. “I know it’s taken other people’s lives, for me it’s just not gonna determine what I can or cannot do,” she said.

 

Share!FacebookGoogle+PinterestRedditLinkedInEmail

8 Comments

  1. nutrisystem

    Don’t firefighters already have free gold-plated healthcare for life?

    That’s in addition to a sweet pension that goes from retirement (usually in their forties) till death.

    Seems like a better solution for them and the taxpayers is wearing their air-masks when in any smoky environments.

    Based on my (limited) observations, they only put air-masks on in extreme cases, and seem to take macho pride in being able to tolerate smoke. Well, duh, smoke causes cancer.

    • John

      Wow, nutrisystem, just when I think I’ve got you pegged, you surprise me by railing against excessive public sector pensions and healthcare benefits,

      There is hope.

    • pim

      They wear their masks dummy. The Cancer is caused by exposure thru the skin.

    • Leigh

      You sound like you know a lot of firefighters because you got not ONE THING right.

      Carcinogens linger LONG after all the need for masks settle. It lives in our gear, in our closes, seeps in our skin before we can shower and that is if another call doesn’t drop before we can do that.

      The rest of the crap you mentioned is hilarious not true, if it is please tell us where so I can go apply!

    • Danielle

      I’m sure all FOUR of my father in laws cancers were due to him being “macho” and not wearing his mask.
      Oh, and last time I checked my husbands paycheck stub that $800 a month for basic health care? Totally free right!?
      And that pension, you know, the one he pays into? The one that my father in law paid into for THIRTY years, good thing he only got to collect it for less than 5 years before he died at 60 from BRAIN CANCER.
      Do your homework, their air can last for as much as 20 minutes at a calm state, when under pressure, fire = pressure, it doesn’t last as long. They “save” their air to save your life.
      My husband leaves his family and kids to protect and serve, as did my father in law before him, I am incredibly proud of both of them.

  2. Pete

    Looks like a couple more guys who couldn’t pass the test! :(

  3. Delilah Smith

    Umm, NO they don’t have “gold-plated healthcare for life” and even if they did, it won’t do them any good if they are dead from cancer. READ the article. Cancer rates are TWICE as high among firefighters. And don’t forget they are exposing themselves to a toxic soup even with their masks on to SAVE YOUR LIFE. Or your loved ones, or someone you know… What price do you put on that? And the “sweet pension” you talk about- they earn EVERY. SINGLE. PENNY. Have you thanked a firefighter lately?

  4. jay royce

    well it sounds if some people don’t really realize what fire fighters do. Since I just lost one of my fellow FF to cancer he was buried today. He didn’t get WC and had to retire on his pension. His cancer was caused though breathing diesel fumes from working in a unventilated station house. When the trucks leave the fumes linger for hours and if you not on the run you are stuck breathing toxic fumes. When you come back they are still there. Look up Bud Planchon in ark.

Comments are closed.